Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sakurai, M.
Right arrow Articles by Strife, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sakurai, M.
Right arrow Articles by Strife, J. L.
(Radiology. 2000;216:112-116.)
© RSNA, 2000


Pediatric Imaging

Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia in Neonates: Variations in Umbilical Catheter and Enteric Tube Position1

Minako Sakurai, MD, Lane F. Donnelly, MD, Lance A. Klosterman, MD 2 and Janet L. Strife, MD

1 From the Department of Radiology, Division of Pediatric Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (M.S., L.F.D.), and the Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital Medical Center and University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Ohio (L.A.K., J.L.S.). Received September 21, 1999; revision requested November 5; revision received November 19; accepted December 7. Address correspondence to L.F.D., Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Ave, Cincinnati, OH 45229-3039 (e-mail: donnelly.lf@chmcc.org).

PURPOSE: To evaluate anatomic variations of support apparatus position on radiographs obtained in neonates with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH).

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors evaluated radiographs obtained in 71 neonates with CDH to determine whether nasogastric tubes, umbilical venous catheters, and umbilical arterial catheters deviated from their expected anatomic course. The relationship between deviation patterns and hernia contents was evaluated.

RESULTS: Sixty-eight neonates—54 with left-sided CDH and 14 with right-sided CDH—had a nasogastric tube. The tubes in 21 patients with left-sided CDH had a normal anatomic course at radiography. Nineteen of these patients did not have stomach in the hernia. In 13 patients, the tip of the nasogastric tube was lodged at the esophagogastric junction. In 17 patients, the tube was in the left hemithorax. In all 30 of these patients, the stomach was within the CDH. All nasogastric tubes in the 14 patients with right-sided CDH had leftward deviation. Thirty-seven patients—27 with left-sided CDH and 10 with right-sided CDH—had umbilical venous catheters. The catheters in 12 patients with left-sided CDH had apex leftward convexity. The umbilical venous catheter in eight patients with right-sided CDH had rightward shift; all eight patients had liver herniation.

CONCLUSION: The positions of nasogastric tubes and umbilical venous catheters vary in several predictable patterns in neonates with CDH. Knowledge of these variations may be helpful for supporting the diagnosis of CDH in unclear cases and thus avoiding unnecessary apparatus adjustments, and for predicting hernia contents.

Index terms: Catheters and catheterization, in infants and children • Hernia, diaphragmatic, 70.15 • Infants, newborns




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
T. B. Hunter and M. S. Taljanovic
Medical Devices of the Abdomen and Pelvis
RadioGraphics, March 1, 2005; 25(2): 503 - 523.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]