Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weltman, D. I.
Right arrow Articles by Moh, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Weltman, D. I.
Right arrow Articles by Moh, P.
(Radiology. 2000;216:172-177.)
© RSNA, 2000


Gastrointestinal Imaging

Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis: Comparison of 5- and 10-mm CT Sections in the Same Patient1

David I. Weltman, MD, Jinxing Yu, MD, John Krumenacker, Jr, MD, Steven Huang, MD and Paul Moh, MD

1 From the Department of Radiology, Nassau County Medical Center, 2201 Hempstead Turnpike, East Meadow, NY 11554. Received June 21, 1999; revision requested August 10; revision received October 18; accepted October 25. Address correspondence to D.I.W. (e-mail: dweltman@ncmc.edu).

PURPOSE: To compare 5- and 10-mm computed tomographic (CT) sections in the same patient to diagnose acute appendicitis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: During an 11-month period, 100 consecutive patients clinically suspected to have acute appendicitis underwent abdominal and pelvic CT. Helical, 10-mm-collimated sections from the diaphragm to the pubic symphysis and 5-mm-collimated sections through the lower part of the abdomen and upper part of the pelvis were obtained. The 10- and 5-mm sections from each patient were separated into two groups and were interpreted independently by two abdominal imaging attending physicians who were blinded to the final results. The interpretations were correlated with the histopathologic or final clinical diagnoses.

RESULTS: Data analysis from blinded reader interpretations of the 5- and 10-mm sections, respectively, revealed sensitivities of 99% and 82% (P < .001), specificities of 98% and 95% (P = .426), and accuracies of 99% and 89% (P < .001). Among the 48 cases of acute appendicitis, abnormal appendices were identified in 94% (n = 45) and 69% (n = 33) (P < .05) on 5- and 10-mm-collimated sections, respectively. Right-lower-quadrant inflammatory changes were identified in 98% (n = 47) and 71% (n = 34) (P < .05) on 5- and 10-mm-collimated sections, respectively. Normal appendices were identified in 75% (n = 39) and 52% (n = 27) of the 52 negative cases on 5- and 10-mm sections (P = .025), respectively.

CONCLUSION: Use of thin-section CT significantly improves the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

Index terms: Appendicitis, 751.291 • Appendix, CT, 751.12112, 751.12115, 751.12118 • Computed tomography (CT), high resolution, 751.12118




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. van Randen, S. Bipat, A. H. Zwinderman, D. T. Ubbink, J. Stoker, and M. A. Boermeester
Acute Appendicitis: Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Performance of CT and Graded Compression US Related to Prevalence of Disease
Radiology, October 1, 2008; 249(1): 97 - 106.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
T. Moteki and H. Horikoshi
New CT Criterion for Acute Appendicitis: Maximum Depth of Intraluminal Appendiceal Fluid
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2007; 188(5): 1313 - 1319.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ImagingHome page
E M Anderson and H K Bungay
Imaging investigation of acute right iliac fossa pain
Imaging, December 1, 2006; 18(4): 257 - 267.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. E. Jacobs
CT and Sonography for Suspected Acute Appendicitis: A Commentary.
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2006; 186(4): 1094 - 1096.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
T. Terasawa, C. C. Blackmore, S. Bent, and R. J. Kohlwes
Systematic Review: Computed Tomography and Ultrasonography To Detect Acute Appendicitis in Adults and Adolescents
Ann Intern Med, October 5, 2004; 141(7): 537 - 546.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. Keyzer, D. Tack, V. de Maertelaer, P. Bohy, P. A. Gevenois, and D. Van Gansbeke
Acute Appendicitis: Comparison of Low-Dose and Standard-Dose Unenhanced Multi-Detector Row CT
Radiology, July 1, 2004; 232(1): 164 - 172.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. M. Horrow, D. S. White, and J. C. Horrow
Differentiation of Perforated from Nonperforated Appendicitis at CT
Radiology, April 1, 2003; 227(1): 46 - 51.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
E. K. Paulson, M. F. Kalady, and T. N. Pappas
Suspected Appendicitis
N. Engl. J. Med., January 16, 2003; 348(3): 236 - 242.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. Alobaidi and A. Shirkhoda
Value of Bone Window Settings on CT for Revealing Appendicoliths in Patients with Appendicitis
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2003; 180(1): 201 - 205.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
P J Shorvon
Imaging of appendicitis: a cautionary note
Br. J. Radiol., September 1, 2002; 75(897): 717 - 720.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
G Ege, H Akman, A Sahin, D Bugra, and K Kuzucu
Diagnostic value of unenhanced helical CT in adult patients with suspected acute appendicitis
Br. J. Radiol., September 1, 2002; 75(897): 721 - 725.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
T C See, C S Ng, C J E Watson, and A K Dixon
Appendicitis: spectrum of appearances on helical CT
Br. J. Radiol., September 1, 2002; 75(897): 775 - 781.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. W. Wise, M. R. Labuski, C. J. Kasales, J. S. Blebea, J. W. Meilstrup, G. P. Holley, S. A. LaRusso, J. Holliman, F. M. Ruggiero, and D. Mauger
Comparative Assessment of CT and Sonographic Techniques for Appendiceal Imaging
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2001; 176(4): 933 - 941.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. Wijetunga, B. S. Tan, J. C. Rouse, G. W. Bigg-Wither, and B. D. Doust
Diagnostic Accuracy of Focused Appendiceal CT in Clinically Equivocal Cases of Acute Appendicitis
Radiology, December 1, 2001; 221(3): 747 - 753.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2000 by the Radiological Society of North America.