Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nawfel, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Adams, D. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nawfel, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Adams, D. F.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article
(Radiology. 2000;216:180-184.)
© RSNA, 2000


Medical Physics

Patient and Personnel Exposure during CT Fluoroscopy-guided Interventional Procedures1

Richard D. Nawfel, MS, Philip F. Judy, PhD, Stuart G. Silverman, MD, Stuart Hooton, RT, Kemal Tuncali, MD and Douglass F. Adams, MD

1 From the Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115. From the 1998 RSNA scientific assembly. Received July 22; revision requested September 2; revision received October 21; accepted November 22. Address correspondence to R.D.N. (e-mail: nawfel@bwh.harvard.edu).

PURPOSE: To estimate patient dose and personnel exposure from phantom measurements during computed tomographic (CT) fluoroscopy, to use the estimates to provide users with dose information, and to recommend methods to reduce exposure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Surface dose was estimated on a CT dosimetric phantom by using thermoluminescent dosimetric (TLD) and CT pencil chamber measurements. Scatter exposure was estimated from scattered radiation measured at distances of 10 cm to 1 m from the phantom. Scatter exposures measured with and without placement of a lead drape on the phantom surface adjacent to the scanning plane were compared.

RESULTS: Phantom surface dose rates ranged from 2.3 to 10.4 mGy/sec. Scattered exposure rates for a commonly used CT fluoroscopic technique (120 kVp, 50 mA, 10-mm section thickness) were 27 and 1.2 µGy/sec at 10 cm and 1 m, respectively, from the phantom. Lead drapes reduced the scattered exposure by approximately 71% and 14% at distances of 10 and 60 cm from the scanning plane, respectively.

CONCLUSION: High exposures to patients and personnel may occur during CT fluoroscopy–guided interventions. Radiation exposure to patients and personnel may be reduced by modifying CT scanning techniques and by limiting fluoroscopic time. In addition, scatter exposure to personnel may be substantially reduced by placing a lead drape adjacent to the scanning plane.

Index terms: Computed tomography (CT), guidance, 70.12119 • Computed tomography (CT), radiation exposure, 70.12119 • Fluoroscopy • Phantoms • Radiations, exposure to patients and personnel, 70.12119 • Radiations, measurement, 70.12119 • Radiations, protective and therapeutic agents and devices, 70.12119


Related Article

CT Fluoroscopy: Another Advancement with Additional Challenges in Radiation Management
Louis K. Wagner
Radiology 2000 216: 9-10. [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. Fritz, C. Thomas, S. Clasen, C. D. Claussen, J. S. Lewin, and P. L. Pereira
Freehand Real-Time MRI-Guided Lumbar Spinal Injection Procedures at 1.5 T: Feasibility, Accuracy, and Safety
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2009; 192(4): W161 - W167.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
I. A. Tsalafoutas, V. Tsapaki, C. Triantopoulou, C. Pouli, V. Kouridou, I. Fagadaki, and J. Papailiou
Comparison of Measured and Calculated Skin Doses in CT-Guided Interventional Procedures
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2008; 191(5): 1601 - 1607.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. Hohl, C. Suess, J. E. Wildberger, D. Honnef, M. Das, G. Muhlenbruch, A. Schaller, R. W. Gunther, and A. H. Mahnken
Dose Reduction during CT Fluoroscopy: Phantom Study of Angular Beam Modulation
Radiology, February 1, 2008; 246(2): 519 - 525.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. Das, F. Sauer, U. J. Schoepf, A. Khamene, S. K. Vogt, S. Schaller, R. Kikinis, E. vanSonnenberg, and S. G. Silverman
Augmented Reality Visualization for CT-guided Interventions: System Description, Feasibility, and Initial Evaluation in an Abdominal Phantom
Radiology, July 1, 2006; 240(1): 230 - 235.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. K. Carlson, J. P. Felmlee, C. E. Bender, R. L. Ehman, K. L. Classic, T. L. Hoskin, W. S. Harmsen, and H. H. Hu
CT Fluoroscopy-guided Biopsy of the Lung or Upper Abdomen with a Breath-hold Monitoring and Feedback System: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Radiology, November 1, 2005; 237(2): 701 - 708.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
P. Aviles Lucas, D. R. Dance, I. A. Castellano, and E. Vano
Estimation of the peak entrance surface air kerma for patients undergoing computed tomography-guided procedures
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, May 17, 2005; 114(1-3): 317 - 320.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
S. Meleka, A. Patra, E. Minkoff, and K. Murphy
Value of CT Fluoroscopy for Lumbar Facet Blocks
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2005; 26(5): 1001 - 1003.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
A. L. Wagner
Selective Lumbar Nerve Root Blocks with CT Fluoroscopic Guidance: Technique, Results, Procedure Time, and Radiation Dose
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., October 1, 2004; 25(9): 1592 - 1594.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. D. Nawfel, P. F. Judy, A. R. Schleipman, and S. G. Silverman
Patient Radiation Dose at CT Urography and Conventional Urography
Radiology, July 1, 2004; 232(1): 126 - 132.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
M. M. Maher, D. A. Gervais, M. K. Kalra, B. Lucey, D. V. Sahani, R. Arellano, P. F. Hahn, and P. R. Mueller
The Inaccessible or Undrainable Abscess: How to Drain It
RadioGraphics, May 1, 2004; 24(3): 717 - 735.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. K. Carlson, J. P. Felmlee, C. E. Bender, R. L. Ehman, K. L. Classic, H. H. Hu, and T. L. Hoskin
Intermittent-Mode CT Fluoroscopy-guided Biopsy of the Lung or Upper Abdomen with Breath-hold Monitoring and Feedback: System Development and Feasibility
Radiology, December 1, 2003; 229(3): 906 - 912.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. A. Binkert, F. R. Verdun, M. Zanetti, C. W. Pfirrmann, and J. Hodler
CT Arthrography of the Glenohumeral Joint: CT Fluoroscopy Versus Conventional CT and Fluoroscopy--Comparison of Image-Guidance Techniques
Radiology, October 1, 2003; 229(1): 153 - 158.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. E. Sakarya, O. Unal, B. Ozbay, K. Uzun, I. Kati, S. Ozen, and O. Etlik
MR Fluoroscopy-guided Transthoracic Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy: Feasibility
Radiology, August 1, 2003; 228(2): 589 - 592.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. B. Solomon, A. Patriciu, M. E. Bohlman, L. R. Kavoussi, and D. Stoianovici
Robotically Driven Interventions: A Method of Using CT Fluoroscopy without Radiation Exposure to the Physician
Radiology, October 1, 2002; 225(1): 277 - 282.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
E. K. Paulson, D. H. Sheafor, D. S. Enterline, H. P. McAdams, and T. T. Yoshizumi
CT Fluoroscopy-guided Interventional Procedures: Techniques and Radiation Dose to Radiologists
Radiology, July 1, 2001; 220(1): 161 - 167.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
L. K. Wagner
CT Fluoroscopy: Another Advancement with Additional Challenges in Radiation Management
Radiology, July 1, 2000; 216(1): 9 - 10.
[Full Text]