|
|
||||||||
Neuroradiology |
1 From the Department of Radiology, Unité de RMN, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 808 route de Lennik, B-1070, Brussels, Belgium. Received July 7, 1999; revision requested August 17; final revision received November 29; accepted December 7. Address correspondence to T.M. (e-mail: tmetens@ulb.ac.be).
PURPOSE: To assess the clinical utility and accuracy of contrast materialenhanced dynamic three-dimensional (3D) T1-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) angiography in the detection of unruptured intracranial aneurysms.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective blinded comparison of 3D contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR angiography with 3D inflow magnetization transfer and tilted optimized nonsaturating excitation (MT TONE) imaging, phase-contrast MR angiography, and conventional digital subtraction angiography (DSA) was performed in 32 consecutive patients. The first dynamic 3D contrast-enhanced T1-weighted acquisition was individually timed after injection of a bolus of gadolinium-based contrast agent to obtain an arterial phase image followed by two sequential venous phase images (three 18-second acquisitions). Two readers independently interpreted and graded the MR images for diagnostic confidence and depiction of aneurysms and subsequently compared them with DSA images.
RESULTS: Three-dimensional contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR angiograms depicted all 23 aneurysms detected in 17 patients at DSA (mean size, 6 mm; range, 221 mm) with one false-positive result by one reader (sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 94%). MT TONE and phase-contrast images failed to depict one and seven aneurysms, respectively (MT TONE sensitivity of 96% and specificity of 100%, phase-contrast sensitivity of 70% and specificity of 100%). Aneurysm depiction at 3D contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR angiography was significantly better than that at MT TONE imaging (P < .012), and that with both was significantly superior to that of phase-contrast imaging (P < .001). Differences in diagnostic confidence in the presence of an aneurysm were not significant between 3D contrast-enhanced T1-weighted and MT TONE imaging (P = .076).
CONCLUSION: Dynamic 3D contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR angiography is a fast, efficient, and minimally invasive imaging method with which to diagnose intracranial aneurysms.
Index terms: Aneurysm, intracranial, 17.73 Aneurysm, MR, 17.12142 Cerebral blood vessels, MR, 17.12142 Magnetic resonance (MR), angiography, 17.12142 Magnetic resonance (MR), three-dimensional, 17.12142
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Nael, J. P. Villablanca, L. Mossaz, W. Pope, A. Juncosa, G. Laub, and J. P. Finn 3-T Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography in Evaluation of Suspected Intracranial Aneurysm: Comparison with MDCT Angiography Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2008; 190(2): 389 - 395. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Nael, J.P. Villablanca, R. Saleh, W. Pope, A. Nael, G. Laub, and J.P. Finn Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography at 3T in the Evaluation of Intracranial Aneurysms: A Comparison with Time-of-Flight MR Angiography AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., November 1, 2006; 27(10): 2118 - 2121. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Pierot, C. Delcourt, F. Bouquigny, D. Breidt, B. Feuillet, O. Lanoix, and S. Gallas Follow-up of intracranial aneurysms selectively treated with coils: Prospective evaluation of contrast-enhanced MR angiography. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 2006; 27(4): 744 - 749. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-Y. Gauvrit, X. Leclerc, S. Caron, C. A. Taschner, J.-P. Lejeune, and J.-P. Pruvo Intracranial Aneurysms Treated With Guglielmi Detachable Coils: Imaging Follow-Up With Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography Stroke, April 1, 2006; 37(4): 1033 - 1037. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. B. L. M. Majoie, M. E. Sprengers, W. J. J. van Rooij, C. Lavini, M. Sluzewski, J. C. van Rijn, and G. J. den Heeten MR Angiography at 3T versus Digital Subtraction Angiography in the Follow-up of Intracranial Aneurysms Treated with Detachable Coils AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 2005; 26(6): 1349 - 1356. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-Y. Gauvrit, X. Leclerc, M. Pernodet, B. Lubicz, J.-P. Lejeune, D. Leys, and J.-P. Pruvo Intracranial Aneurysms Treated with Guglielmi Detachable Coils: Usefulness of 6-Month Imaging Follow-Up with Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., March 1, 2005; 26(3): 515 - 521. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. A. Willinek, M. Born, B. Simon, H. J. Tschampa, C. Krautmacher, J. Gieseke, H. Urbach, H. J. Textor, and H. H. Schild Time-of-Flight MR Angiography: Comparison of 3.0-T Imaging and 1.5-T Imaging--Initial Experience Radiology, December 1, 2003; 229(3): 913 - 920. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-P. Cottier, A. Bleuzen-Couthon, S. Gallas, C. B. Vinikoff-Sonier, P. Bertrand, F. Domengie, L. Barantin, and D. Herbreteau Intracranial Aneurysms Treated with Guglielmi Detachable Coils: Is Contrast Material Necessary in the Follow-up with 3D Time-of-Flight MR Angiography? AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., October 1, 2003; 24(9): 1797 - 1803. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Leclerc, J.-F. Navez, J.-Y. Gauvrit, J.-P. Lejeune, and J.-P. Pruvo Aneurysms of the Anterior Communicating Artery Treated with Guglielmi Detachable Coils: Follow-Up with Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., August 1, 2002; 23(7): 1121 - 1127. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Hochmuth, U. Spetzger, and M. Schumacher Comparison of Three-Dimensional Rotational Angiography with Digital Subtraction Angiography in the Assessment of Ruptured Cerebral Aneurysms AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., August 1, 2002; 23(7): 1199 - 1205. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Okahara, H. Kiyosue, M. Yamashita, H. Nagatomi, H. Hata, T. Saginoya, Y. Sagara, and H. Mori Diagnostic Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Angiography for Cerebral Aneurysms in Correlation With 3D-Digital Subtraction Angiographic Images: A Study of 133 Aneurysms Stroke, July 1, 2002; 33(7): 1803 - 1808. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P M White, E Teadsale, J M Wardlaw, and V Easton What is the most sensitive non-invasive imaging strategy for the diagnosis of intracranial aneurysms? J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, September 1, 2001; 71(3): 322 - 328. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Yamada, T. Nakagawa, Y. Matsushima, and H. Shibuya High-Resolution Turbo Magnetic Resonance Angiography for Diagnosis of Moyamoya Disease Stroke, August 1, 2001; 32(8): 1825 - 1831. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. M. White, E. M. Teasdale, J. M. Wardlaw, and V. Easton Intracranial Aneurysms: CT Angiography and MR Angiography for Detection—Prospective Blinded Comparison in a Large Patient Cohort Radiology, June 1, 2001; 219(3): 739 - 749. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||