Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baumgartner, I.
Right arrow Articles by Mahler, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Baumgartner, I.
Right arrow Articles by Mahler, F.
(Radiology. 2000;216:498-505.)
© RSNA, 2000


Vascular and Interventional Radiology

Stent Placement in Ostial and Nonostial Atherosclerotic Renal Arterial Stenoses: A Prospective Follow-up Study1

Iris Baumgartner, MD, Kathrin von Aesch, RN, Do-Dai Do, MD, Jürgen Triller, MD, Manuela Birrer, MD and Felix Mahler, MD

1 From the Division of Angiology (I.B., K.v.A., D.D.D., M.B., F.M.) and the Department of Radiology (J.T.), University Hospital, Freiburgstrasse, 3010 Bern, Switzerland. Received June 30, 1999; revision requested August 16; final revision received November 26; accepted December 7. Address correspondence to I.B. (e-mail: iris.baumgartner@insel.ch).

PURPOSE: To compare the results of balloon percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty (PTRA) and stent placement in atherosclerotic ostial, proximal, and isolated truncal stenoses.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 1994 and April 1998 the authors prospectively followed up 163 consecutive patients with 200 atherosclerotic renal arterial lesions after primary PTRA or primary stent placement. Duplex ultrasonography was performed 1 day and 3, 6, and 12 months later.

RESULTS: The primary 12-month PTRA patency rates were 34% (21 of 33 atherosclerotic lesions) for ostial stenoses, 65% (20 of 60) for proximal stenoses, and 83% (five of 30) for truncal stenoses ({chi}2 value, 15.63; P < .001). The corresponding stent patency rates were 80% (four of 21), 72% (nine of 34), and 66% (five of nine), respectively ({chi}2 value, 4.11; not significant). Significant stent-related reduction in risk of restenosis was limited to the ostial stenoses (P = .002).

CONCLUSION: Renal arterial stent placement considerably improves patency in ostial stenoses, but compared with the technically successful PTRA, it does not significantly improve primary patency in proximal and isolated truncal renal arterial stenoses.

Index terms: Renal angiography, 961.122 • Renal arteries, stenosis or obstruction, 961.721 • Renal arteries, transluminal angioplasty, 961.1282, 961.1286 • Renal arteries, US, 961.12989 • Stents and prostheses, 961.1268, 961.1286




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Vasc MedHome page
G. J Dubel and T. P Murphy
The role of percutaneous revascularization for renal artery stenosis
Vascular Medicine, May 1, 2008; 13(2): 141 - 156.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
C. J. Cooper and T. P. Murphy
The Case for Renal Artery Stenting for Treatment of Renal Artery Stenosis
Circulation, January 16, 2007; 115(2): 263 - 270.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
E. Balk, G. Raman, M. Chung, S. Ip, A. Tatsioni, A. Alonso, P. Chew, S. J. Gilbert, and J. Lau
Effectiveness of Management Strategies for Renal Artery Stenosis: A Systematic Review
Ann Intern Med, December 19, 2006; 145(12): 901 - 912.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
H. Ota, K. Takase, H. Rikimaru, M. Tsuboi, T. Yamada, A. Sato, S. Higano, T. Ishibashi, and S. Takahashi
Quantitative Vascular Measurements in Arterial Occlusive Disease
RadioGraphics, September 1, 2005; 25(5): 1141 - 1158.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PERSPECT VASC SURG ENDOVASC THERHome page
K. J. Hansen, D. B. Wilson, and M. S. Edwards
Surgical Revascularization of Atherosclerotic Renovascular Disease: State of the Art
Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, December 1, 2004; 16(4): 281 - 295.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
PERSPECT VASC SURG ENDOVASC THERHome page
R. E. Zierler
Atherosclerotic Renovascular Disease: Natural History and Diagnosis
Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, December 1, 2004; 16(4): 299 - 310.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
Z. Morvay, E. Nagy, R. Bagi, G. Abraham, R. Sipka, and A. Palko
Sonographic Follow-up After Visceral Artery Stenting
J. Ultrasound Med., August 1, 2004; 23(8): 1057 - 1064.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. H. Rundback, D. Sacks, K. C. Kent, C. Cooper, D. Jones, T. Murphy, K. Rosenfield, C. White, M. Bettmann, S. Cortell, et al.
Guidelines for the Reporting of Renal Artery Revascularization in Clinical Trials
Circulation, September 17, 2002; 106(12): 1572 - 1585.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. V. Behar, R. C. Nelson, J. P. Zidar, D. M. DeLong, and T. P. Smith
Thin-Section Multidetector CT Angiography of Renal Artery Stents
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2002; 178(5): 1155 - 1159.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
H.-Y. Lee and E. G. Grant
Sonography in Renovascular Hypertension
J. Ultrasound Med., April 1, 2002; 21(4): 431 - 441.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. Mallouhi, M. Schocke, W. Judmaier, C. Wolf, A. Dessl, B. V. Czermak, P. Waldenberger, and W. R. Jaschke
3D MR Angiography of Renal Arteries: Comparison of Volume Rendering and Maximum Intensity Projection Algorithms
Radiology, May 1, 2002; 223(2): 509 - 516.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2000 by the Radiological Society of North America.