| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Vascular and Interventional Radiology |
1 From the Departments of Urology (E.L., D.B., C.E., M.D.F., D.R., C.C.), Radiology (M.A.), and Pathology (L.D.), Hôpital Salvator, 249 Blvd Ste Marguerite, 13274 Marseille, France. Received April 12, 1999; revision requested June 14; final revision received November 29; accepted November 2. Address correspondence to E.L. (e-mail: elechevallier@mail.ap.hm.fr).
PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility, accuracy, and clinical role of fine-needle percutaneous biopsy of renal masses, with helical computed tomographic (CT) guidance.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 63 patients (mean age, 62 years), 73 biopsies were performed. The median tumor size was 4.0 cm. Tumor biopsy was performed with an 18-gauge needle by using helical CT guidance in an outpatient setting. Two to four cores per tumor were obtained.
RESULTS: Biopsy material was insufficient for analysis in 15 (21%) procedures. The median tumor size of failed or successful biopsies was 3.0 or 4.8 cm, respectively (P = .03). A benign lesion was found at eight biopsies. Two samples were suspicious for renal cell carcinoma (RCC). RCC was found in 38 biopsy samples. The remainder were transitional cell carcinoma, metastasis, lymphoma, or sarcoma. Twenty-six patients underwent nephrectomy. The accuracies of biopsy for histopathologic and Fuhrman nuclear grade evaluation were 89% and 78%, respectively. For tumors of 3.0 cm or smaller or larger than 3.0 cm, 37% (11 of 30) or 9% (four of 43) had failure of biopsy, respectively (P = .006). No substantial morbidity occurred.
CONCLUSION: Fine-needle biopsy with helical CT guidance is accurate for the histopathologic evaluation of renal masses without morbidity. Indications are renal lesions that do not have the typical radiologic features of RCC, Bosniak category III or IV cystic lesions, and locally advanced or metastatic RCC.
Index terms: Computed tomography (CT), guidance, 81.1261, 81.1262 • Kidney, biopsy, 81.1261, 81.1262 • Kidney neoplasms, 81.20, 81.3141, 81.317, 81.318, 81.321, 81.324, 81.327, 81.336, 81.34 • Kidney neoplasms, CT, 81.12111, 81.12115 • Kidney neoplasms, diagnosis, 81.1261, 81.1262 • Kidney neoplasms, metastases, 81.336
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. R. M. Sun, L. Ngo, E. M. Genega, M. B. Atkins, M. E. Finn, N. M. Rofsky, and I. Pedrosa Renal Cell Carcinoma: Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging for Differentiation of Tumor Subtypes--Correlation with Pathologic Findings Radiology, March 1, 2009; 250(3): 793 - 802. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Signoretti, G. Bratslavsky, F. M. Waldman, V. E. Reuter, J. Haaga, M. Merino, G. V. Thomas, M. R. Pins, T. Libermann, J. Gillespie, et al. Tissue-Based Research in Kidney Cancer: Current Challenges and Future Directions Clin. Cancer Res., June 15, 2008; 14(12): 3699 - 3705. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. K. Hatfield, R. A. Beres, S. S. Sane, and G. X. Zaleski Percutaneous Imaging-Guided Solid Organ Core Needle Biopsy: Coaxial Versus Noncoaxial Method Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2008; 190(2): 413 - 417. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Zhang, R. A. Lefkowitz, N. M. Ishill, L. Wang, C. S. Moskowitz, P. Russo, H. Eisenberg, and H. Hricak Solid Renal Cortical Tumors: Differentiation with CT Radiology, August 1, 2007; 244(2): 494 - 504. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. D. Beland, W. W. Mayo-Smith, D. E. Dupuy, J. J. Cronan, and R. A. DeLellis Diagnostic Yield of 58 Consecutive Imaging-Guided Biopsies of Solid Renal Masses: Should We Biopsy All That Are Indeterminate? Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2007; 188(3): 792 - 797. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. E. Maturen, H. V. Nghiem, E. M. Caoili, E. G. Higgins, J. S. Wolf Jr., and D. P. Wood Jr. Renal Mass Core Biopsy: Accuracy and Impact on Clinical Management Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2007; 188(2): 563 - 570. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. G. Silverman, Y. U. Gan, K. J. Mortele, K. Tuncali, and E. S. Cibas Renal Masses in the Adult Patient: The Role of Percutaneous Biopsy Radiology, July 1, 2006; 240(1): 6 - 22. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Tuncali, E. vanSonnenberg, S. Shankar, K. J. Mortele, E. S. Cibas, and S. G. Silverman Evaluation of Patients Referred for Percutaneous Ablation of Renal Tumors: Importance of a Preprocedural Diagnosis Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2004; 183(3): 575 - 582. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. A. Bosniak, M. G. Harisinghani, M. M. Maher, D. A. Gervais, and P. R. Mueller Should We Biopsy Complex Cystic Renal Masses (Bosniak Category III)? Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2003; 181(5): 1425 - 1426. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. J. Rybicki, K. M. Shu, E. S. Cibas, J. R. Fielding, E. vanSonnenberg, and S. G. Silverman Percutaneous Biopsy of Renal Masses: Sensitivity and Negative Predictive Value Stratified by Clinical Setting and Size of Masses Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2003; 180(5): 1281 - 1287. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. M. Caoili, R. O. Bude, E. J. Higgins, D. L. Hoff, and H. V. Nghiem Evaluation of Sonographically Guided Percutaneous Core Biopsy of Renal Masses Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2002; 179(2): 373 - 378. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
