Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lucidarme, O.
Right arrow Articles by Cluzel, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lucidarme, O.
Right arrow Articles by Cluzel, P.
(Radiology. 2000;216:768-772.)
© RSNA, 2000


Thoracic Imaging

Evaluation of Air Trapping at CT: Comparison of Continuous- versus Suspended-Expiration CT Techniques1

Olivier Lucidarme, MD, Philippe A. Grenier, MD, Medhi Cadi, MD, Isabelle Mourey-Gerosa, MD, Karim Benali, MD and Philippe Cluzel, MD

1 From the Department of Radiology, Université Pierre-et-Marie-Curie, Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, 47 boulevard de l’Hôpital, 75651 Paris cedex 13, France (O.L., P.A.G., M.C., I.M.G., P.C.); Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Paris, France (P.A.G.); and Cyclotron Biomedical de Caen, Caen, France (K.B.). From the 1997 RSNA scientific assembly. Received March 29, 1999; revision requested May 10; final revision received January 7, 2000; accepted January 12. Address correspondence to O.L. (e-mail: olivier.lucidarme@psl.ap_hop_paris.fr).

PURPOSE: To compare thin-section computed tomographic (CT) scans obtained during suspended end expiration with helical CT scans obtained during continuous expiration for the assessment of air trapping.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-nine patients with an airway disease were examined with suspended-end-expiration CT after a 6–8-second expiratory maneuver, which was followed with continuous-expiration CT during a 10-second expiratory maneuver. The extent of expiratory air-trapping areas was calculated by two observers by using a semiquantitative grid score. The relative decrease in attenuation in the areas of air trapping was evaluated with a visual continuous-scale score.

RESULTS: Air trapping was noted in 36 and 35 patients with continuous-expiration CT and with suspended-end-inspiration CT, respectively. The extents of and relative attenuation decreases in air-trapping areas in patients with air-trapping areas on at least one expiratory CT scan increased significantly in scans obtained with continuous-expiration CT compared with those obtained with suspended-end-expiration CT, respectively, with mean extent scores of 0.24 ± 0.20 (SD) and 0.18 ± 0.20 (paired t test, P = .001) respectively, and with mean relative contrast decrease scores of 0.35 ± 0.23 and 0.27 ± 0.23 (paired t test, P = .007), respectively.

CONCLUSION: When suspended-end-expiration CT images are ambiguous, complementary continuous-expiration CT can be used to improve the conspicuity and apparent extent of air trapping.

Index terms: Lung, abnormalities, 60.26, 60.751, 60.754, 60.755 • Lung, CT, 60.12111, 60.12115, 60.12118 • Lung, function • Lung, ventilation




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
Y.-M. Lee, J.-S. Park, J.-H. Hwang, S.-W. Park, S.-t. Uh, Y.-H. Kim, and C.-S. Park
High-Resolution CT Findings in Patients With Near-Fatal Asthma: Comparison of Patients With Mild-to-Severe Asthma and Normal Control Subjects and Changes in Airway Abnormalities Following Steroid Treatment
Chest, December 1, 2004; 126(6): 1840 - 1848.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2000 by the Radiological Society of North America.