Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McGahan, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, C. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McGahan, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, C. D.
(Radiology. 2000;216:788-791.)
© RSNA, 2000


Emergency Radiology

Comparison of US Utilization and Technical Costs before and after Establishment of 24-hour In-house Coverage for US Examinations1

John P. McGahan, MD, Michael S. Cronan, RD, MS, John R. Richards, MD and C. Darryl Jones, MD

1 From the Department of Radiology (J.P.M., M.S.C., C.D.J.) and Division of Emergency Medicine (J.R.R.), University of California-Davis Medical Center, Ambulatory Care Center, 4860 Y St, Ste 3100, Sacramento, CA 95817. From the 1998 RSNA scientific assembly. Received May 27, 1999; revision requested August 5; final revision received March 3, 2000; accepted March 7. Address correspondence to J.P.M. (e-mail: john.mcgahan@ucdmc.ucdavis.edu).

PURPOSE: To compare data regarding the cost and number of ultrasonographic (US) examinations performed for 6 months, before and after institution of 24-hour in-house sonographer coverage.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data for a 6-month period during which US services were provided by a sonographer on call from 11 PM to 7 AM were compared with data for a 6-month period during which a sonographer was in house during this shift.

RESULTS: With 11 PM to 7 AM on-call coverage, the sonographers performed 147 examinations in a 6-month period, an average of 0.81 examination per shift. After institution of in-house coverage for this shift, 792 US examinations were performed in 6 months, an average of 4.3 examinations per shift. The cost for 11 PM to 7 AM in-house sonographer coverage for 6 months was approximately $16,000 more than that for on-call coverage. This cost would be offset by revenues from one additional examination per night. The cost per examination for the 11 PM to 7 AM shift decreased from $124.70 to $43.33.

CONCLUSION: At the authors’ institution, 24-hour in-house sonographer coverage resulted in additional cost, which was offset by revenues from additional examinations. There was nearly a fivefold increase in the number of US examinations performed per shift. These examinations were performed more expediently, enabling more rapid patient triage.

Index terms: Cost-effectiveness • Emergency medical service system • Radiology and radiologists, departmental management • Ultrasound (US), utilization




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
Y. Siegel, A. Grubstein, V. Postnikov, O. Moreh, E. Yussim, and M. Cohen
Ultrasonography in Patients Without Trauma in the Emergency Department: Impact on Discharge Diagnosis
J. Ultrasound Med., October 1, 2005; 24(10): 1371 - 1376.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
J. P. McGahan, L. Wang, and J. R. Richards
From the RSNA Refresher Courses: Focused Abdominal US for Trauma
RadioGraphics, October 1, 2001; 21(90001): S191 - 199.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2000 by the Radiological Society of North America.