Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mitsuzaki, K.
Right arrow Articles by Hiai, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mitsuzaki, K.
Right arrow Articles by Hiai, Y.
(Radiology. 2000;216:909-915.)
© RSNA, 2000


Technical Developments

Abdomen, Pelvis, and Extremities: Diagnostic Accuracy of Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Turbo MR Angiography Compared with Conventional Angiography-Initial Experience1

Katsuhiko Mitsuzaki, MD, Yasuyuki Yamashita, MD, Tatsuya Sakaguchi, MD, Ichiro Ogata, MD, Mutsumasa Takahashi, MD and Yasuhiro Hiai, RT

1 From the Department of Radiology, Kumamoto University School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Honjo, Kumamoto 860, Japan. Received March 1, 1999; revision requested April 15; final revision received December 6; accepted December 20. Address correspondence to K.M. (e-mail: katsumit@kaiju.medic.kumamoto-u.ac.jp).

To determine the value of contrast material–enhanced three-dimensional turbo magnetic resonance (MR) angiography compared with conventional cut-film or digital subtraction angiography for evaluating arterial stenosis in the abdomen, pelvis, and extremities. For detection of significant stenosis, MR angiography had 91% sensitivity and 89% specificity. This technique is highly sensitive in lesion detection, but stenosis tended to be overestimated.

Index terms: Angiography, comparative studies, 92.122, 93.122, 96.122, 98.122 • Magnetic resonance (MR), comparative studies, 92.129416, 93.129416, 96.129416, 98.129416, • Magnetic resonance (MR), vascular studies, 92.129416, 93.129416, 96.129416, 98.129416,




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
R. Ouwendijk, M. C. J. M. Kock, K. Visser, P. M. T. Pattynama, M. W. de Haan, and M. G. M. Hunink
Interobserver Agreement for the Interpretation of Contrast-Enhanced 3D MR Angiography and MDCT Angiography in Peripheral Arterial Disease
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2005; 185(5): 1261 - 1267.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
H. Sakuma, Y. Ichikawa, N. Suzawa, T. Hirano, K. Makino, N. Koyama, M. Van Cauteren, and K. Takeda
Assessment of Coronary Arteries with Total Study Time of Less than 30 Minutes by Using Whole-Heart Coronary MR Angiography
Radiology, October 1, 2005; 237(1): 316 - 321.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. K. Willmann, S. Wildermuth, T. Pfammatter, J. E. Roos, B. Seifert, P. R. Hilfiker, B. Marincek, and D. Weishaupt
Aortoiliac and Renal Arteries: Prospective Intraindividual Comparison of Contrast-enhanced Three-dimensional MR Angiography and Multi-Detector Row CT Angiography
Radiology, March 1, 2003; 226(3): 798 - 811.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
E A Dick, R Aviv, I Francis, G Hamilton, D Baker, C Black, A Platts, and A Watkinson
Catheter angiography and angioplasty in patients with scleroderma
Br. J. Radiol., December 1, 2001; 74(888): 1091 - 1096.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2000 by the Radiological Society of North America.