|
|
||||||||
Gastrointestinal Imaging |
1 From the Departments of Radiology (E.R., J.S.) and Public Health (M.J.C.E.), Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands, and the Department of Radiology, G. 1-211, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands (E.R., J.S., J.S.L.). From the 1999 RSNA scientific assembly. Received August 24, 1999; revision requested October 14; revision received March 2, 2000; accepted March 30. Address correspondence to E.R. (e-mail: e.rociu@amc.uva.nl).
PURPOSE: To describe the various patterns of normal sphincter anatomy as seen at endoanal magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and to assess sex- and age-related variations in the dimensions of the anal sphincter to refine the diagnosis of sphincter disorders.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Endoanal MR imaging (1.5 T) was performed in 100 healthy volunteers (50 women, 50 men) evenly distributed between ages 20 and 85 years. The essential anatomic structures were evaluated, and various patterns in men and women were recorded. The thickness of the anal sphincter muscles and the length of the anal canal were measured, and age- and sex-related correlations were studied.
RESULTS: Sex-related differences included a significantly shorter external sphincter in women than in men both laterally (mean, 27.1 mm ± 5.4 vs 28.6 mm ± 4.3; P < .05) and anteriorly (mean, 14.0 mm ± 3.0 vs 27.0 mm ± 53.0; P < .051). The superficial transverse perineal muscle is located more superiorly in women than in men. The central perineal tendon in men is a central muscular insertion point; in women, it represents an area where muscle fibers imbricate. Age-related variations included a significant decrease in the thickness of the external sphincter in men (P < .01). Significant decrease in the thickness of the longitudinal muscle and increase in the thickness of the internal sphincter were noted in both sexes (P < .01).
CONCLUSION: High-spatial-resolution endoanal MR imaging provides excellent visualization of pelvic floor structures. Severe atrophy as it occurs in incontinent patients should be differentiated from physiologic, age-related thinning of the external sphincter and longitudinal muscle.
Index terms: Aging Anus, 757.92 Anus, MR, 757.121411, 757.121412 Magnetic resonance (MR), coils, 757.121419 Magnetic resonance (MR), three-dimensional
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F. Berton, G. Gola, and S. R. Wilson Sonography of Benign Conditions of the Anal Canal: An Update Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2007; 189(4): 765 - 773. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. C. Dobben, M. P. Terra, M. Deutekom, J. F. M. Slors, L. W. M. Janssen, P. M. M. Bossuyt, and J. Stoker The Role of Endoluminal Imaging in Clinical Outcome of Overlapping Anterior Anal Sphincter Repair in Patients with Fecal Incontinence Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2007; 189(2): W70 - W77. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. C. Dobben, M. P. Terra, J. F. M. Slors, M. Deutekom, M. F. Gerhards, R. G. H. Beets-Tan, P. M. M. Bossuyt, and J. Stoker External Anal Sphincter Defects in Patients with Fecal Incontinence: Comparison of Endoanal MR Imaging and Endoanal US Radiology, February 1, 2007; 242(2): 463 - 471. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Forsberg, W. T. Shi, C. R. B. Merritt, Q. Dai, M. Solcova, and B. B. Goldberg On the Usefulness of the Mechanical Index Displayed on Clinical Ultrasound Scanners for Predicting Contrast Microbubble Destruction J. Ultrasound Med., April 1, 2005; 24(4): 443 - 450. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A F Christensen, B Nyhuus, M B Nielsen, and H Christensen Three-dimensional anal endosonography may improve diagnostic confidence of detecting damage to the anal sphincter complex Br. J. Radiol., April 1, 2005; 78(928): 308 - 311. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Frudinger, S. Halligan, C. I. Bartram, A. B. Price, M. A. Kamm, and R. Winter Female Anal Sphincter: Age-related Differences in Asymptomatic Volunteers with High-Frequency Endoanal US Radiology, August 1, 2002; 224(2): 417 - 423. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J Stoker and E Rociu Endoanal MRI in anal incontinence Imaging, December 31, 2001; 13(6): 467 - 472. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. G. H. Beets-Tan, G. L. Morren, G. L. Beets, A. G. H. Kessels, K. el Naggar, E. Lemaire, C. G. M. I. Baeten, and J. M. A. van Engelshoven Measurement of Anal Sphincter Muscles: Endoanal US, Endoanal MR Imaging, or Phased-Array MR Imaging? A Study with Healthy Volunteers Radiology, July 1, 2001; 220(1): 81 - 89. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||