Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sardanelli, F.
Right arrow Articles by Cogorno, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sardanelli, F.
Right arrow Articles by Cogorno, N.
(Radiology. 2000;217:576-580.)
© RSNA, 2000


Technical Developments

Breast Biphasic Compression versus Standard Monophasic Compression in X-ray Mammography1

Francesco Sardanelli, MD, Franco Zandrino, MD, Andrea Imperiale, MD, Emma Bonaldo, MD, Maria G. Quartini, RT and Nadia Cogorno, RT

1 From the Department of Experimental Medicine, Section of Diagnostic Imaging, Genoa University School of Medicine, Genova, Italy (F.S., F.Z., E.B., M.G.Q., N.C.), and the National Institute for Cancer Research, Genova, Italy (A.I.). Received May 6, 1999; revision requested July 16; final revision received January 17, 2000; accepted February 11. Address correspondence to F.S., Department of Radiology, the Biomedical Institute, Via Prà 1b, 16157 Genova, Italy. (e-mail: sardanelli@biomedicalspa.com).

Breast biphasic compression (22.5° angled paddle, followed by progressive angle reduction) was compared with standard monophasic compression in x-ray mammography. The presence of the pectoral muscle was recorded for the craniocaudal (CC) view and the presence of the inframammary fold for the mediolateral oblique (MLO) view. The amount of breast in each study and image quality were assessed for both views. For all parameters, biphasic compression performed better than monophasic compression in both CC (P < .006) and MLO (P < .04) views.

Index terms: Breast radiography, comparative studies, 00.11 • Breast radiography, technology, 00.11




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
N. Stone and P. Matousek
Advanced Transmission Raman Spectroscopy: A Promising Tool for Breast Disease Diagnosis
Cancer Res., June 1, 2008; 68(11): 4424 - 4430.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2000 by the Radiological Society of North America.