Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sheafor, D. H.
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, R. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sheafor, D. H.
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, R. C.
(Radiology. 2000;217:792-797.)
© RSNA, 2000


Emergency Radiology

Nonenhanced Helical CT and US in the Emergency Evaluation of Patients with Renal Colic: Prospective Comparison1

Douglas H. Sheafor, MD, Barbara S. Hertzberg, MD, Kelly S. Freed, MD, Barbara A. Carroll, MD, Mary T. Keogan, MD, Erik K. Paulson, MD, David M. DeLong, PhD and Rendon C. Nelson, MD

1 From the Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3808, Erwin Rd, Durham, NC 27710. From the 1999 RSNA scientific assembly. Received February 21, 2000; revision requested April 5; revision received May 16; accepted June 1. Address correspondence to D.H.S. (e-mail: sheaf001@mc.duke.edu).

PURPOSE: To compare nonenhanced helical computed tomography (CT) with ultrasonography (US) for the depiction of urolithiasis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: During 9 months, 45 patients (mean age, 44 years; mean weight, 92.5 kg) prospectively underwent both nonenhanced helical CT (5-mm collimation; pitch of 1.5) and US of the kidneys, ureters, and bladder. US evaluation included a careful search for ureteral calculi. Presence of calculi and obstruction and incidental diagnoses were recorded. Clinical, surgical, and/or imaging follow-up data were obtained in all patients. The McNemar test was used to compare groups.

RESULTS: Diagnoses included 23 ureteral calculi and one each of renal cell carcinoma, appendicitis, ureteropelvic junction obstruction, renal subcapsular hematoma, cholelithiasis, medullary calcinosis, and myelolipoma. CT depicted 22 of 23 ureteral calculi (sensitivity, 96%). US depicted 14 of 23 ureteral calculi (sensitivity, 61%). Differences in sensitivity were statistically significant (P = .02). Specificity for each technique was 100%. When modalities were compared for the detection of any clinically relevant abnormality (eg, unilateral hydronephrosis and/or urolithiasis in patients with an obstructing calculus), sensitivities of US and CT increased to 92% and 100%, respectively. One case of appendicitis was missed at US, whereas medullary calcinosis and myelolipoma were missed at CT.

CONCLUSION: Nonenhanced CT has a higher sensitivity for the detection of ureteral calculi compared with US.

Index terms: Computed tomography (CT), comparative studies, 80.12111 • Genitourinary system, CT, 80.12111 • Genitourinary system, US, 80.12981 • Hydronephrosis, 81.84 • Ultrasound (US), comparative studies, 80.12981 • Ureter, calculi, 82.81




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
T. Niemann, T. Kollmann, and G. Bongartz
Diagnostic Performance of Low-Dose CT for the Detection of Urolithiasis: A Meta-Analysis
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2008; 191(2): 396 - 401.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Postgrad. Med. J.Home page
M Masarani and M Dinneen
Ureteric colic: new trends in diagnosis and treatment
Postgrad. Med. J., July 1, 2007; 83(981): 469 - 472.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
P.-A. Poletti, A. Platon, O. T. Rutschmann, F. R. Schmidlin, C. E. Iselin, and C. D. Becker
Low-Dose Versus Standard-Dose CT Protocol in Patients with Clinically Suspected Renal Colic
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2007; 188(4): 927 - 933.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
M. Mitterberger, G. M. Pinggera, E. Maier, H. Neuwirt, R. Neururer, L. Pallwein, J. Gradl, G. Bartsch, H. Strasser, and F. Frauscher
Value of 3-Dimensional Transrectal/ Transvaginal Sonography in Diagnosis of Distal Ureteral Calculi
J. Ultrasound Med., January 1, 2007; 26(1): 19 - 27.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. G. Silverman, S. A. Akbar, K. J. Mortele, K. Tuncali, J. G. Bhagwat, and J. L. Seifter
Multi-Detector Row CT Urography of Normal Urinary Collecting System: Furosemide versus Saline as Adjunct to Contrast Medium
Radiology, September 1, 2006; 240(3): 749 - 755.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Emerg. Med. J.Home page
M Kartal, O Eray, T Erdogru, and S Yilmaz
Prospective validation of a current algorithm including bedside US performed by emergency physicians for patients with acute flank pain suspected for renal colic
Emerg. Med. J., May 1, 2006; 23(5): 341 - 344.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. I. Katz, S. Saluja, J. A. Brink, and H. P. Forman
Radiation Dose Associated with Unenhanced CT for Suspected Renal Colic: Impact of Repetitive Studies.
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2006; 186(4): 1120 - 1124.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
E. Ozden, C. Gogus, K. Turkolmez, and C. Yagci
Is Fluid Ingestion Really Necessary During Ultrasonography for Detecting Ureteral Stones?: A Prospective Randomized Study
J. Ultrasound Med., December 1, 2005; 24(12): 1651 - 1657.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
W. Liu, K. J. Mortele, and S. G. Silverman
Incidental Extraurinary Findings at MDCT Urography in Patients with Hematuria: Prevalence and Impact on Imaging Costs
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2005; 185(4): 1051 - 1056.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ImagingHome page
S J Freeman and H Sells
Investigation of loin pain
Imaging, August 1, 2005; 17(1): 19 - 33.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
G. C. Curhan
A 44-Year-Old Woman With Kidney Stones
JAMA, March 2, 2005; 293(9): 1107 - 1114.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
Durr-e-Sabih, A. N. Khan, M. Craig, and J. A. Worrall
Sonographic Mimics of Renal Calculi
J. Ultrasound Med., October 1, 2004; 23(10): 1361 - 1367.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. M. Goldman, S. Faintuch, S. A. Ajzen, D. M. J. Christofalo, M. P. Araujo, V. Ortiz, M. Srougi, P. J. Kenney, and J. Szejnfeld
Diagnostic Value of Attenuation Measurements of the Kidney on Unenhanced Helical CT of Obstructive Ureterolithiasis
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2004; 182(5): 1251 - 1254.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
E. P. Tamm, P. M. Silverman, and W. P. Shuman
Evaluation of the Patient with Flank Pain and Possible Ureteral Calculus
Radiology, August 1, 2003; 228(2): 319 - 329.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
D. Tack, S. Sourtzis, I. Delpierre, V. de Maertelaer, and P. A. Gevenois
Low-Dose Unenhanced Multidetector CT of Patients with Suspected Renal Colic
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2003; 180(2): 305 - 311.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
O. Catalano, A. Nunziata, F. Altei, and A. Siani
Suspected Ureteral Colic: Primary Helical CT Versus Selective Helical CT After Unenhanced Radiography and Sonography
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2002; 178(2): 379 - 387.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
B. E. Van Beers, S. Dechambre, P. Hulcelle, R. Materne, and J. Jamart
Value of Multislice Helical CT Scans and Maximum-Intensity-Projection Images to Improve Detection of Ureteral Stones at Abdominal Radiography
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2001; 177(5): 1117 - 1121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2000 by the Radiological Society of North America.