|
|
||||||||
Cardiac Imaging |
1 From the Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (L.F.B., P.A.P.); and the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, 200 Second St SW, Rochester, MN 55905 (P.F.S.). Received February 7, 2000; revision requested April 3; revision received June 19; accepted July 14. Supported by National Institutes of Health grant R01 HL46292 and a General Clinical Research Center grant from the National Institutes of Health (MO1-RR00585) awarded to Mayo Clinic Rochester. Address correspondence to P.F.S. (e-mail: psheedy@mayo.edu).
PURPOSE: To use a recently described regression approach to evaluate agreement in the quantity of coronary artery calcification (CAC) with two consecutive acquisitions (dual scan runs) at electron-beam computed tomography (CT) in a quality-control program and to assess the change in CAC quantity over time in an individual.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 1,376 asymptomatic research participants, who were not selected because they were at high risk for coronary artery disease, were examined for the quantity of CAC with dual scan runs at electron-beam CT. With these data, 95% limits of agreement were established and used to evaluate differences between scan runs performed approximately 3.5 years apart in 81 participants.
RESULTS: The 95% limits of agreement depended on the mean quantity of CAC in the dual scan runs. Of the 81 participants whose examinations were approximately 3.5 years apart, 59 (73%) had no apparent change in CAC between the two examinations, 21 (26%) had large increases suggesting progression of CAC, and one (1%) had a large decrease suggesting regression of CAC.
CONCLUSION: The demonstrated method can be used to evaluate both agreement in dual scan runs and change in quantity of CAC over time.
Index terms: Computed tomography (CT), electron beam, 54.12111, 54.12119 Coronary vessels, calcification, 54.81 Coronary vessels, CT, 54.12111, 54.12119 Statistical analysis
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Mazzaferro, M. Pasquali, F. Taggi, M. Baldinelli, C. Conte, M. L. Muci, N. Pirozzi, I. Carbone, M. Francone, and F. Pugliese Progression of Coronary Artery Calcification in Renal Transplantation and the Role of Secondary Hyperparathyroidism and Inflammation Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., March 1, 2009; 4(3): 685 - 690. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Chung, R. L. McClelland, R. Katz, J. J. Carr, and M. J. Budoff Repeatability Limits for Measurement of Coronary Artery Calcified Plaque with Cardiac CT in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2008; 190(2): W87 - W92. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Rutten, I. Isgum, and M. Prokop Coronary Calcification: Effect of Small Variation of Scan Starting Position on Agatston, Volume, and Mass Scores Radiology, December 1, 2007; 246(1): 90 - 98. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. E. Cassidy-Bushrow, L. F. Bielak, P. F. Sheedy II, S. T. Turner, I. J. Kullo, X. Lin, and P. A. Peyser Coronary Artery Calcification Progression Is Heritable Circulation, July 3, 2007; 116(1): 25 - 31. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Kronmal, R. L. McClelland, R. Detrano, S. Shea, J. A. Lima, M. Cushman, D. E. Bild, and G. L. Burke Risk Factors for the Progression of Coronary Artery Calcification in Asymptomatic Subjects: Results From the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) Circulation, May 29, 2007; 115(21): 2722 - 2730. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Messika-Zeitoun, L. F. Bielak, P. A. Peyser, P. F. Sheedy, S. T. Turner, V. T. Nkomo, J. F. Breen, J. Maalouf, C. Scott, A. J. Tajik, et al. Aortic Valve Calcification: Determinants and Progression in the Population Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., March 1, 2007; 27(3): 642 - 648. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. Iovannisci, E. J. Lammer, L. Steiner, S. Cheng, L. T. Mahoney, P. H. Davis, R. M. Lauer, and T. L. Burns Association Between A Leukotriene C4 Synthase Gene Promoter Polymorphism and Coronary Artery Calcium in Young Women: The Muscatine Study Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., February 1, 2007; 27(2): 394 - 399. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Budoff, S. Achenbach, R. S. Blumenthal, J. J. Carr, J. G. Goldin, P. Greenland, A. D. Guerci, J. A.C. Lima, D. J. Rader, G. D. Rubin, et al. Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease by Cardiac Computed Tomography: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, and Committee on Cardiac Imaging, Council on Clinical Cardiology Circulation, October 17, 2006; 114(16): 1761 - 1791. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F Cademartiri Is calcium the key for the assessment of progression/regression of coronary artery disease? Heart, September 1, 2006; 92(9): 1187 - 1188. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Schmermund, S. Achenbach, T. Budde, Y. Buziashvili, A. Forster, G. Friedrich, M. Henein, G. Kerkhoff, F. Knollmann, V. Kukharchuk, et al. Effect of Intensive Versus Standard Lipid-Lowering Treatment With Atorvastatin on the Progression of Calcified Coronary Atherosclerosis Over 12 Months: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind Trial Circulation, January 24, 2006; 113(3): 427 - 437. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. E. Clouse, J. Chen, H. M. Krumholz, M. E. Clouse, J. Chen, and H. M. Krumholz Noninvasive Screening for Coronary Artery Disease With Computed Tomography Is Useful Circulation, January 3, 2006; 113(1): 125 - 146. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. B. Sevrukov, J. M. Bland, and G. T. Kondos Serial Electron Beam CT Measurements of Coronary Artery Calcium: Has Your Patient's Calcium Score Actually Changed? Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2005; 185(6): 1546 - 1553. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. E. Cassidy, L. F. Bielak, Y. Zhou, P. F. Sheedy II, S. T. Turner, J. F. Breen, P. A. Araoz, I. J. Kullo, X. Lin, and P. A. Peyser Progression of Subclinical Coronary Atherosclerosis: Does Obesity Make a Difference? Circulation, April 19, 2005; 111(15): 1877 - 1882. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Schlosser, P. Hunold, A. Schmermund, H. Kuhl, K.-U. Waltering, J. F. Debatin, and J. Barkhausen Coronary Artery Calcium Score: Influence of Reconstruction Interval at 16-Detector Row CT with Retrospective Electrocardiographic Gating Radiology, November 1, 2004; 233(2): 586 - 589. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Messika-Zeitoun, M.-C. Aubry, D. Detaint, L. F. Bielak, P. A. Peyser, P. F. Sheedy, S. T. Turner, J. F. Breen, C. Scott, A. J. Tajik, et al. Evaluation and Clinical Implications of Aortic Valve Calcification Measured by Electron-Beam Computed Tomography Circulation, July 20, 2004; 110(3): 356 - 362. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Abedin, Y. Tintut, and L. L. Demer Vascular Calcification: Mechanisms and Clinical Ramifications Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., July 1, 2004; 24(7): 1161 - 1170. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Hokanson, T. MacKenzie, G. Kinney, J. K. Snell-Bergeon, D. Dabelea, J. Ehrlich, R. H. Eckel, and M. Rewers Evaluating Changes in Coronary Artery Calcium: An Analytic Method That Accounts for Interscan Variability Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2004; 182(5): 1327 - 1332. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Budoff Tracking Progression of Heart Disease with Cardiac Computed Tomography Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, April 1, 2004; 9(2): 75 - 82. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Vliegenthart, B. Song, A. Hofman, J. C. M. Witteman, and M. Oudkerk Coronary Calcification at Electron-Beam CT: Effect of Section Thickness on Calcium Scoring in Vitro and in Vivo Radiology, November 1, 2003; 229(2): 520 - 525. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. R. Van Hoe, K. G. De Meerleer, P. Ph. Leyman, and P. K. Vanhoenacker Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring Using ECG-Gated Multidetector CT: Effect of Individually Optimized Image-Reconstruction Windows on Image Quality and Measurement Reproducibility Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2003; 181(4): 1093 - 1100. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Rumberger and L. Kaufman A Rosetta Stone for Coronary Calcium Risk Stratification: Agatston, Volume, and Mass Scores in 11,490 Individuals Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2003; 181(3): 743 - 748. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. S. Sonnad Describing Data: Statistical and Graphical Methods Radiology, December 1, 2002; 225(3): 622 - 628. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Achenbach, D. Ropers, K. Pohle, A. Leber, C. Thilo, A. Knez, T. Menendez, R. Maeffert, M. Kusus, M. Regenfus, et al. Influence of Lipid-Lowering Therapy on the Progression of Coronary Artery Calcification: A Prospective Evaluation Circulation, August 27, 2002; 106(9): 1077 - 1082. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Peyser, L. F. Bielak, J. S. Chu, S. T. Turner, D. L. Ellsworth, E. Boerwinkle, and P. F. Sheedy II Heritability of Coronary Artery Calcium Quantity Measured by Electron Beam Computed Tomography in Asymptomatic Adults Circulation, July 16, 2002; 106(3): 304 - 308. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Pohle, R. Maffert, D. Ropers, W. Moshage, N. Stilianakis, W. G. Daniel, and S. Achenbach Progression of Aortic Valve Calcification: Association With Coronary Atherosclerosis and Cardiovascular Risk Factors Circulation, October 16, 2001; 104(16): 1927 - 1932. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. D. Hopper, D. C. Strollo, and D. T. Mauger Comparison of Electron-Beam and Ungated Helical CT in Detecting Coronary Arterial Calcification by Using a Working Heart Phantom and Artificial Coronary Arteries Radiology, February 1, 2002; 222(2): 474 - 482. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||