|
|
||||||||
Gastrointestinal Imaging |
1 From the Department of Radiology, Division of Body MRI, New York University Medical Center, 530 First Ave, New York, NY 10016. Received April 25, 2000; revision requested June 9; revision received July 19; accepted July 25. Address correspondence to M.T.L. (e-mail: michael.lavelle@med.nyu.edu).
PURPOSE: To assess the accuracy of an interpolated breath-hold T1-weighted three-dimensional (3D) gradient-echo (GRE) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging sequence with near-isotropic pixel size (
2.3 mm) for evaluation of hepatic arterial anatomy variants during dynamic liver parenchymal imaging and to report patterns of hepatic arterial anatomy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Liver MR imaging, including an interpolated breath-hold 3D GRE sequence with fat suppression (4.2/1.8 [repetition time msec/echo time msec], 12° flip angle), was performed in 207 consecutive patients before and after gadopentetate dimeglumine administration. Of the 207 patients, 202 (98%) had technically satisfactory studies clearly defining the hepatic arterial system. The first contrast materialenhanced GRE acquisition was timed for optimal arterial enhancement with a timing examination. In a retrospective review, hepatic arteries were evaluated on the basis of arterial phase images interpreted by two independent readers using transverse source images complemented by multiplanar reconstructions. Twenty-three patients also underwent digital subtraction angiography, which was a reference standard for comparison.
RESULTS: Conventional hepatic arterial anatomy was demonstrated in 135 (67%) of 202 patients. In the 23 patients with angiographic correlation, no discrepancy was noted between MR imaging and digital subtraction angiographic findings.
CONCLUSION: Hepatic arterial anatomy can be reliably demonstrated during liver parenchymal imaging with an optimally timed contrast-enhanced isotropic 3D GRE sequence.
Index terms: Arteries, MR, 952.129412, 952.129415 Hepatic arteries, 952.132, 952.92 Liver, anatomy, 761.92 Liver, angiography, 761.12413, 761.12453 Liver, blood supply, 952.132, 952.92 Liver, MR, 761.121412, 761.121415 Magnetic resonance (MR), three-dimensional, 761.121419
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. M. Willatt, H. K. Hussain, S. Adusumilli, and J. A. Marrero MR Imaging of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the Cirrhotic Liver: Challenges and Controversies Radiology, May 1, 2008; 247(2): 311 - 330. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Heilmaier, R. Sutter, A. M. Lutz, B. Seifert, D. Weishaupt, B. Marincek, and J. K. Willmann Mapping of Hepatic Vascular Anatomy: Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Parallel MR Imaging Compared with 64 Detector Row CT Radiology, December 1, 2007; 245(3): 872 - 880. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Pedrosa, E. A. Zeikus, D. Levine, and N. M. Rofsky MR Imaging of Acute Right Lower Quadrant Pain in Pregnant and Nonpregnant Patients RadioGraphics, May 1, 2007; 27(3): 721 - 743. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Ishigami, Y. Zhang, S. Rayhill, D. Katz, and A. Stolpen Does Variant Hepatic Artery Anatomy in a Liver Transplant Recipient Increase the Risk of Hepatic Artery Complications After Transplantation? Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2004; 183(6): 1577 - 1584. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. McKenzie, D. Lim, B. J. Ransil, M. Morrin, I. Pedrosa, E. N. Yeh, D. K. Sodickson, and N. M. Rofsky Shortening MR Image Acquisition Time for Volumetric Interpolated Breath-hold Examination with a Recently Developed Parallel Imaging Reconstruction Technique: Clinical Feasibility Radiology, February 1, 2004; 230(2): 589 - 594. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Guiney, J. B. Kruskal, J. Sosna, D. W. Hanto, S. N. Goldberg, and V. Raptopoulos Multi-Detector Row CT of Relevant Vascular Anatomy of the Surgical Plane in Split-Liver Transplantation Radiology, November 1, 2003; 229(2): 401 - 407. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Erbay, V. Raptopoulos, E. A. Pomfret, I. R. Kamel, and J. B. Kruskal Living Donor Liver Transplantation in Adults: Vascular Variants Important in Surgical Planning for Donors and Recipients Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2003; 181(1): 109 - 114. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |