HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hidajat, N. Articles by Felix, R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hidajat, N. Articles by Felix, R.

Survey of Conventional and Spiral CT Doses¹

¹ From the Department of Radiology (Strahlenklinik und Poliklinik), Charité, Virchow-Clinic of the Humboldt-University, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany (N.H., M.W., P.L., B.G., U.T., R.J.S., R.F.); and the Technical Supervisory Authority, Berlin, Germany (A.N.). Received November 24, 1999; revision requested January 21, 2000; final revision received June 16; accepted June 28. Address correspondence to N.H. (e-mail: hidajat@telda.net).

PURPOSE: To investigate the radiation dose for conventional computed tomography (CT) and spiral CT during different CT examinations at various hospitals and practices.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: CT dose index with an active length of 15 cm was measured in 16 different types of CT scanners by using ionization chamber dosimetry. Twenty-six holders (one who has legal responsibility under national law for a radiologic installation) operating a total of seven conventional and 20 spiral CT scanners were asked for their standard parameters for various CT examinations. Weighted CT dose index and dose-length product were determined for each examination.

RESULTS: For most examinations, the tube current time product was significantly higher for conventional CT than for spiral CT (.002 P .05). The ratio of section distance to section thickness for conventional CT was significantly lower than the pitch for spiral CT (.001 P .05). The weighted CT dose index and dose-length product for spiral CT were about half of those for conventional CT. The third quartiles for weighted CT dose index and dose-length product for spiral CT were much lower than those recommended as reference doses.

CONCLUSION: CT examinations with conventional CT scanners are often performed with unnecessarily high radiation dose. For the establishment of reference doses, the radiation dose with spiral CT scanners should be taken into account.

Index terms: Computed tomography (CT), radiation exposure, _**.12111², _**.12112, _**.12115 • Dosimetry, _**.12111, _**.12112, _**.12115 • Radiations, exposure to patients and personnel, _**.12111, _**.12112, _**.12115 • Radiations, measurement, _**.12111, _**.12112, _**.12115

This article has been cited by other articles:

				V. Tsapaki, J. E. Aldrich, R. Sharma, M. A. Staniszewska, A. Krisanachinda, M. Rehani, A. Hufton, C. Triantopoulou, P. N. Maniatis, J. Papailiou, et al. Dose Reduction in CT while Maintaining Diagnostic Confidence: Diagnostic Reference Levels at Routine Head, Chest, and Abdominal CT--IAEA-coordinated Research Project Radiology, September 1, 2006; 240(3): 828 - 834. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Das, A. H. Mahnken, G. Muhlenbruch, A. Stargardt, C. Weiss, D.-A. Sennst, T. G. Flohr, R. W. Gunther, and J. E. Wildberger Individually Adapted Examination Protocols for Reduction of Radiation Exposure for 16-MDCT Chest Examinations Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2005; 184(5): 1437 - 1443. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Mahesh, J. C. Scatarige, J. Cooper, and E. K. Fishman Dose and Pitch Relationship for a Particular Multislice CT Scanner Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2001; 177(6): 1273 - 1275. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]