Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Geijer, H.
Right arrow Articles by Persliden, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Geijer, H.
Right arrow Articles by Persliden, J.
(Radiology. 2001;218:402-410.)
© RSNA, 2001

Medical Physics

Digital Radiography of Scoliosis with a Scanning Method: Initial Evaluation1

Håkan Geijer, MD, BA, Karl-Wilhelm Beckman, MSc, Berith Jonsson, RN, Torbjörn Andersson, MD, PhD and Jan Persliden, PhD

1 From the Departments of Radiology (H.G., T.A.) and Medical Physics (K.W.B., B.J., J.P.), Örebro Medical Centre Hospital, 701 85 Örebro, Sweden. From the 1999 RSNA scientific assembly. Received February 8, 2000; revision requested April 7; revision received May 25; accepted July 31. Supported by the research committee of Örebro County Council and the Swedish Radiation Protection Institute, project SSI P1141.99. Address correspondence to H.G. (e-mail:hakan.geijer@orebroll.se).

PURPOSE: To evaluate the radiation dose, image quality, and Cobb angle measurements obtained with a digital scanning method of scoliosis radiography.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Multiple images were reconstructed into one image at a workstation. A low-dose alternative was to use digital pulsed fluoroscopy. Dose measurements were performed with thermoluminescent dosimeters in an Alderson phantom. At the same time, kerma area-product values were recorded. A Monte Carlo dose calculation also was performed. Image quality was evaluated with a contrast-detail phantom and visual grading system. Angle measurements were evaluated with an angle phantom and measurements obtained on patient images.

RESULTS: The effective radiation dose was 0.087 mSv for screen-film imaging, 0.16 mSv for digital exposure imaging, and 0.017 mSv for digital fluoroscopy; the corresponding kerma area-product values were 0.43, 0.87, and 0.097 Gy · cm2, respectively. The image quality of the digital exposure and screen-film images was about equal at visual grading, whereas fluoroscopy had lower image quality. The angle phantom had lower angle values with digital fluoroscopy, although the difference in measured angles was less than 0.5°. The patient images showed no difference in angles.

CONCLUSION: The described digital scanning method has acceptable image quality and adequate accuracy in angle measurements. The radiation dose required for digital exposure imaging is higher than that required for screen-film imaging, but that required for digital fluoroscopy is much lower.

Index terms: Dosimetry • Images, quality, 30.11, 30.1215 • Radiations, exposure to patients and personnel • Radiography, digital, 30.1215 • Spine, curvature, 30.861 • Spine, radiography, 30.11, 30.1215




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 RadioGraphicsHome page
M. Korner, C. H. Weber, S. Wirth, K.-J. Pfeifer, M. F. Reiser, and M. Treitl
Advances in Digital Radiography: Physical Principles and System Overview
RadioGraphics, May 1, 2007; 27(3): 675 - 686.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Br. J. Radiol.Home page
M Bath and L G Mansson
Visual grading characteristics (VGC) analysis: a non-parametric rank-invariant statistical method for image quality evaluation
Br. J. Radiol., March 1, 2007; 80(951): 169 - 176.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]