HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Funaki, B. Articles by Rosenblum, J. D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Funaki, B. Articles by Rosenblum, J. D.

Radiologic Placement of Tunneled Hemodialysis Catheters in Occluded Neck, Chest, or Small Thyrocervical Collateral Veins in Central Venous Occlusion¹

¹ From the Department of Radiology, the University of Chicago Hospitals, 5841 S Maryland Ave, MC 2026, Chicago, IL 60637 (B.F., J.A.L., J.N.L., T.V.H., J.D.R.); and the Racine Radiology Group, Wis (G.X.Z.). Received March 13, 2000; revision requested May 2; revision received May 30; accepted June 28. Address correspondence to B.F. (e-mail: bfunaki@midway.uchicago.edu).

PURPOSE: To evaluate interventional radiologic placement of tunneled hemodialysis catheters in small thyrocervical collateral veins or in occluded veins in the neck or chest in patients with limited venous access.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A femoral venous approach was used to recanalize occluded veins or catheterize small collateral veins in 24 patients in whom all major central veins were occluded. A loop snare or catheter was used as a target for antegrade puncture. Metallic stents were deployed if necessary. Once antegrade access was secured, catheters were placed in a conventional fashion.

RESULTS: Technical success was achieved in 22 (88%) of 25 procedures (one patient underwent two procedures). All catheters functioned immediately after placement. There were two procedural complications: a vasovagal episode requiring intravenously administered atropine sulfate and an episode of respiratory distress requiring intubation. There were no instances of pneumothorax, nerve injury, or bleeding complications. Catheter malfunction requiring exchange occurred at a rate of 0.67 per 100 catheter days. Infection requiring catheter removal occurred at a rate of 0.06 per 100 catheter days. Primary patency was 90% at 1 month, 71% at 6 months, and 25% at 12 months. Secondary patency was 100% at 6 months and 70% at 12 months.

CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing hemodialysis in whom conventional venous access sites have been exhausted, interventional radiologic venous recanalization for the placement of permanent catheters is safe and effective. Catheters placed in recanalized veins or small collateral veins have shorter primary patency rates compared with those of conventionally placed catheters, but the former can be maintained for relatively long periods.

Index terms: Catheters and catheterization, central venous access, 907.1269, 9462.1269 • Catheters and catheterization, complications, 907.442, 9462.442 • Catheters and catheterization, technology • Dialysis, 81.42 • Veins, access, 907.1269, 9462.1269

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. Funaki Central Venous Access: A Primer for the Diagnostic Radiologist Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2002; 179(2): 309 - 318. [Full Text] [PDF]