Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Miró, S. P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Betts, B. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Miró, S. P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Betts, B. J.
(Radiology. 2001;218:527-532.)
© RSNA, 2001


Thoracic Imaging

Digital Storage Phosphor Chest Radiography: An ROC Study of the Effect of 2K versus 4K Matrix Size on Observer Performance1

Santiago P. M. Miró, MD 2, Ann N. Leung, MD, Geoffrey D. Rubin, MD, Young Hi Choi, MD 3, Stephen T. Kee, MD, Robert E. Mindelzun, MD, Paul Stark, MD 4, Lewis Wexler, MD, Sylvia K. Plevritis, PhD and Bradley J. Betts, PhD

1 From the Department of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center, 300 Pasteur Dr, S072A, Stanford, CA 94305-5105. Received February 23, 2000; revision requested April 9; revision received June 12; accepted July 25. Supported in part by a grant from Fuji Medical Systems. Address correspondence to A.N.L. (e-mail: aleung@stanford.edu).

PURPOSE: To compare observer performance in the detection of abnormalities on 1,760 x 2,140 matrix (2K) and 3,520 x 4,280 matrix (4K) digital storage phosphor chest radiographs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred sixty patients who underwent dedicated computed tomography (CT) of the thorax were prospectively recruited into the study. Posteroanterior and lateral computed radiographs of the chest were acquired in each patient and printed in 2K and 4K formats. Six radiologists independently analyzed the hard-copy images and scored the presence of parenchymal (opacities <=2 cm, opacities >2 cm, and subtle interstitial), mediastinal, and pleural abnormalities on a five-point confidence scale. With CT as the reference standard, observer performance tests were carried out by using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

RESULTS: Analysis of averaged observer performance showed 2K and 4K images were equally effective in detection of all three groups of abnormalities. In the detection of the three subtypes of parenchymal abnormalities, there were no significant differences in averaged performance between the 2K and 4K formats (area below ROC curve [Az] values: opacities <=2 cm, 0.62 ± 0.056 [standard error] and 0.59 ± 0.045; opacities >2 cm, 0.86 ± .025 and 0.85 ± 0.030; subtle interstitial abnormalities, 0.73 ± 0.041 and 0.72 ± 0.041). Averaged performance in detection of mediastinal and pleural abnormalities was equivalent (Az values: mediastinal, 0.70 ± 0.046 and 0.73 ± 0.033; pleural, 0.85 ± 0.032 and 0.86 ± 0.033).

CONCLUSION: Observer performance in detection of parenchymal, mediastinal, and pleural abnormalities was not significantly different on 2K and 4K storage phosphor chest radiographs.

Index terms: Radiography, comparative studies, 60.1215 • Radiography, digital, 60.1215 • Radiography, storage phosphor, 60.1215 • Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve • Thorax, radiography, 60.1215




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. M. Goo, J.-G. Im, H. J. Lee, M. J. Chung, J. B. Seo, H. Y. Kim, Y.-J. Lee, J.-W. Kang, and J. H. Kim
Detection of Simulated Chest Lesions by Using Soft-Copy Reading: Comparison of an Amorphous Silicon Flat-Panel-Detector System and a Storage-Phosphor System
Radiology, July 1, 2002; 224(1): 242 - 246.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2001 by the Radiological Society of North America.