|
|
||||||||
Vascular and Interventional Radiology |
1 From the Depts of Radiology of Univ Hosp, Währinger Gürtel 1820, A-1093 Vienna, Austria (S.A.T., C.L.); Osatek Hosp de Galdácano, Spain (A.C.); Hosp Ruber Internacional, Madrid, Spain (F.H.D.O.); Centre Hosp Univ, Liège, Belgium (R.F.D.); Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain (C.G.); Martin Luther Univ, Halle, Germany (A.G.J.); Univ Central Hosp, Helsinki, Finland (P.K.); Univ Hosp, Nottingham, United Kingdom (C.N.L.); Nycomed Amersham Imaging, Munich, Germany (M.M.); Hosp Univ Dr Peset, Valencia, Spain (J.P.d.C., L.M.B.); Centre Hosp Régional, Univ de Lille, France (J.P.P.); Hosp General Univ, Valencia (V.M.S.); and Univ Hosp Rudolf Virchow, Berlin, Germany (T.V.). Supported by Nycomed Amersham. Received Jan 4, 2000; revision requested Feb 28; final revision received Aug 21; accepted Sep 14. Address correspondence to S.A.T. (e-mail: siegfried.thurnher@univie.ac.at).
PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of gadodiamide-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography with single and triple doses in the assessment of abdominal arterial stenoses.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred five patients were included in the randomized, double-blind, phase III multicenter trial. Results of MR angiography with 0.1 mmol/kg and 0.3 mmol/kg doses of gadodiamide were compared with those of digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and according to dose.
RESULTS: No serious adverse events were observed. The mean contrast index at the region proximal to the primary stenosis was significantly higher in the triple-dose group (P = .03). Mean 95% CI values for the difference in depicted degree of stenosis between DSA and postcontrast MR angiography improved from -3.4% ± 4.7 (SD) in the single-dose group to -1.2% ± 4.7 in the triple-dose group. Mean values for overall image quality on the visual analogue scale improved with the triple dose (P = .02). Confidence in diagnosis was high at postcontrast MR angiography in 88% and 96% of cases in the single- and triple-dose groups, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Gadodiamide-enhanced MR angiography performed with single and triple doses is safe and effective for assessing major abdominal arterial stenoses. Although high agreement between MR angiography and DSA was achieved with both doses, triple-dose MR angiography was superior in the evaluations of image quality, degree of arterial stenoses, and confidence in diagnosis.
Index terms: Arteries, stenosis or obstruction, 95.72, 96.72, 98.72 Contrast media Gadolinium Magnetic resonance (MR), vascular studies, 95.12942, 95.12943, 96.12942, 96.12943, 98.12942, 98.12943
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H.-J. Chang, R. T. George, K. H. Schuleri, K. Evers, K. Kitagawa, J. A.C. Lima, and A. C. Lardo Prospective Electrocardiogram-Gated Delayed Enhanced Multidetector Computed Tomography Accurately Quantifies Infarct Size and Reduces Radiation Exposure J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., April 1, 2009; 2(4): 412 - 420. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Schmidt and R. Morgan Renal Contrast-enhanced MR Angiography: Timing Errors and Accurate Depiction of Renal Artery Origins Radiology, October 1, 2008; 249(1): 178 - 186. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Remy-Jardin, J. Bahepar, J.-J. Lafitte, P. Dequiedt, O. Ertzbischoff, J. Bruzzi, V. Delannoy-Deken, A. Duhamel, and J. Remy Multi-Detector Row CT Angiography of Pulmonary Circulation with Gadolinium-based Contrast Agents: Prospective Evaluation in 60 Patients Radiology, March 1, 2006; 238(3): 1022 - 1035. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Schaefer, F. P. Boudghene, H. J. Brambs, M. Bret-Zurita, J. L. Caniego, R. A. Coulden, H. B. Gehl, R. Hammerstingl, A. Huber, R. J. Mendez, et al. Abdominal and Iliac Arterial Stenoses: Comparative Double-blinded Randomized Study of Diagnostic Accuracy of 3D MR Angiography with Gadodiamide or Gadopentetate Dimeglumine Radiology, March 1, 2006; 238(3): 827 - 840. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Chicoskie and R. Tello Gadolinium-Enhanced MDCT Angiography of the Abdomen: Feasibility and Limitations Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2005; 184(6): 1821 - 1828. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.D. Wolff, J. Schwitter, R. Coulden, M.G. Friedrich, D.A. Bluemke, R.W. Biederman, E.T. Martin, A.J. Lansky, F. Kashanian, T.K.F. Foo, et al. Myocardial First-Pass Perfusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Multicenter Dose-Ranging Study Circulation, August 10, 2004; 110(6): 732 - 737. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Kluge, T. Dill, O. Ekinci, J. Hansel, C. Hamm, H. F. Pitschner, and G. Bachmann Decreased Pulmonary Perfusion in Pulmonary Vein Stenosis After Radiofrequency Ablation: Assessment With Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Perfusion Imaging Chest, August 1, 2004; 126(2): 428 - 437. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. K. Willmann, S. Wildermuth, T. Pfammatter, J. E. Roos, B. Seifert, P. R. Hilfiker, B. Marincek, and D. Weishaupt Aortoiliac and Renal Arteries: Prospective Intraindividual Comparison of Contrast-enhanced Three-dimensional MR Angiography and Multi-Detector Row CT Angiography Radiology, March 1, 2003; 226(3): 798 - 811. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||