Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hama, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Kusano, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hama, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Kusano, S.
(Radiology. 2001;219:207-212.)
© RSNA, 2001


Radiation Oncology

Carcinoma of the Uterine Cervix: Twice- versus Once-weekly High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy1

Yukihiro Hama, MD, Minoru Uematsu, MD, Ichiro Nagata, MD, Akira Shioda, RTT, Atsushi Suda, RTT, Yutaka Sakurai, MD, Masashi Kono, MD, Taiji Tamura, MD and Shoichi Kusano, MD

1 From the Department of Radiology, Division of Radiation Oncology (Y.H., M.U., A. Shioda, A. Suda, M.K., T.T., S.K.), Obstetrics and Gynecology (I.N.), and Public Health (Y.S.), National Defense Medical College, 3-2 Namiki, Tokorozawa, Saitama 359-0042, Japan. From the 1999 RSNA scientific assembly. Received April 12, 2000; revision requested June 6; revision received July 21; accepted August 29. Address correspondence to M.U.

PURPOSE: To compare the effectiveness and safety of once- versus twice-weekly high–dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy for cervical cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 1980 to 1997, 124 consecutive previously untreated patients with cervical cancer were treated with external-beam irradiation (50 Gy) and HDR brachytherapy. Clinical stages were I, 4 (3%) patients; II, 51 (41%); III, 64 (52%); and IV, 5 (4%). From 1980 to 1992, 74 patients (group A) were treated with HDR brachytherapy once weekly (about three fractions of 7 Gy each to point A [2 cm superior and 2 cm lateral to the inferior end of the intrauterine radioactive source]), while from 1992 to 1997, 50 patients (group B) were treated twice weekly (about six fractions of 4.5 Gy each to point A).

RESULTS: Overall survival rate at 5 years was 65.2% in group A and 65.3% in group B (P = .96). Local recurrence-free survival rate at 5 years was 69% (51 of 74 patients) in group A and 90% (45 of 50 patients) in group B (P < .001). The rate of grade 2 (moderate) and grade 3 (severe) complications was significantly lower in group B (6% vs 32% in group A, P < .001). At multivariate analysis, the variables significantly associated with increased local-regional recurrence rates were having stage III–IV lesions (P = .04) and with fewer than six sessions of HDR brachytherapy (P = .02).

CONCLUSION: The twice-weekly HDR regimen may improve the local control rate with fewer complications.

Index terms: Radiations, injurious effects, complications of therapeutic radiology, 854.1269 • Radiobiology, time-dose studies • Therapeutic radiology, interstitial and intracavitary, 854.1269 • Uterine neoplasms, 854.32




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Jpn J Clin OncolHome page
S.-W. Chen, J.-A. Liang, S.-N. Yang, and F.-J. Lin
High Dose-rate Brachytherapy for Elderly Patients with Uterine Cervical Cancer
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., May 1, 2003; 33(5): 221 - 228.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2001 by the Radiological Society of North America.