Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brown, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Kurtz, A. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brown, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Kurtz, A. B.
(Radiology. 2001;219:213-218.)
© RSNA, 2001


Genitourinary Imaging

Primary versus Secondary Ovarian Malignancy: Imaging Findings of Adnexal Masses in the Radiology Diagnostic Oncology Group Study1

Douglas L. Brown, MD, Kelly H. Zou, PhD, Clare M. C. Tempany, MD, Mary C. Frates, MD, Stuart G. Silverman, MD, Barbara J. McNeil, MD, PhD and Alfred B. Kurtz, MD

1 From the Departments of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, (D.L.B., K.H.Z., C.M.C.T., M.C.F., S.G.S., B.J.M.) and the Department of Health Care Policy (K.H.Z., B.J.M.), Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115; and the Department of Radiology, Jefferson Medical College and Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pa (A.B.K.). From the 1999 RSNA scientific assembly. Received March 28, 2000; revision requested May 14; revision received August 18; accepted September 14. Supported in part by Public Health Service grant NIH-U01 CA9398-03 awarded by the National Cancer Institute, Department of Health and Human Services. Address correspondence to D.L.B. (e-mail: dlbrown@partners.org).

PURPOSE: To analyze ultrasonographic (US), computed tomographic (CT), and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging features of primary and secondary ovarian malignant neoplasms to determine if there is any significant difference in their appearance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Analysis of the multi-institutional Radiology Diagnostic Oncology Group data revealed 86 patients with primary ovarian carcinoma and 24 patients with a secondary ovarian neoplasm. Numerous imaging features that had been recorded for the adnexal masses with each imaging modality were reviewed and compared between primary and secondary malignant ovarian neoplasms.

RESULTS: Of the imaging features assessed with all three modalities, multilocularity as determined at US (P = .02) or MR imaging (P = .01) was the only significant feature. At US, 30 (37%) of 81 primary ovarian cancers were multilocular, whereas only three (12%) of 24 metastatic neoplasms were multilocular. At MR imaging, 40 (74%) of 54 primary ovarian cancers were multilocular, whereas only five (36%) of 14 metastatic neoplasms were multilocular. Neither a predominately solid appearance nor bilaterality was significantly different between primary and secondary neoplasms.

CONCLUSION: For malignant ovarian masses, multilocularity at MR imaging or US favors the diagnosis of primary ovarian malignancy rather than secondary neoplasm, but it is difficult to accurately distinguish between primary and secondary ovarian malignancies.

Index terms: Ovary, CT, 852.12112, 852.12113, 852.12115 • Ovary, MR, 852.121411, 852.121415, 852.12143 • Ovary, neoplasms, 852.32, 852.33 • Ovary, US, 852.12989




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
G. R. Vijayaraghavan and D. Levine
Case 109: Meigs Syndrome
Radiology, March 1, 2007; 242(3): 940 - 944.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
I. Imaoka, A. Wada, Y. Kaji, T. Hayashi, M. Hayashi, M. Matsuo, and K. Sugimura
Developing an MR Imaging Strategy for Diagnosis of Ovarian Masses
RadioGraphics, September 1, 2006; 26(5): 1431 - 1448.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
C. N. Krasner, M. Roche, N. S. Horowitz, J. G. Supko, S. I. Lee, and E. Oliva
Case 11-2006 -- A 54-Year-Old Woman with a Mass in the Pelvis
N. Engl. J. Med., April 13, 2006; 354(15): 1615 - 1625.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
J A Spencer
A multidisciplinary approach to ovarian cancer at diagnosis
Br. J. Radiol., October 1, 2005; 78(Special_Issue_2): S94 - S102.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
J. L. Alcazar, M. J. Galan, C. Ceamanos, and M. Garcia-Manero
Transvaginal Gray Scale and Color Doppler Sonography in Primary Ovarian Cancer and Metastatic Tumors to the Ovary
J. Ultrasound Med., March 1, 2003; 22(3): 243 - 247.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
K. H. Zou, J. R. Fielding, S. G. Silverman, and C. M. C. Tempany
Hypothesis Testing I: Proportions
Radiology, March 1, 2003; 226(3): 609 - 613.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
S. E. Jung, J. M. Lee, S. E. Rha, J. Y. Byun, J. I. Jung, and S. T. Hahn
CT and MR Imaging of Ovarian Tumors with Emphasis on Differential Diagnosis
RadioGraphics, November 1, 2002; 22(6): 1305 - 1325.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2001 by the Radiological Society of North America.