Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sirlin, C. B.
Right arrow Articles by Hoyt, D. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sirlin, C. B.
Right arrow Articles by Hoyt, D. B.
(Radiology. 2001;219:229-235.)
© RSNA, 2001


Emergency Radiology

US of Blunt Abdominal Trauma: Importance of Free Pelvic Fluid in Women of Reproductive Age1

Claude B. Sirlin, MD, Giovanna Casola, MD, Michèle A. Brown, MD, Nirav Patel, MD, Eli J. Bendavid, MD, Reena Deutsch, PhD and David B. Hoyt, MD

1 From the Departments of Radiology (C.B.S., G.C., M.A.B., E.J.B.), Surgery (N.P., D.B.H.), and Family and Preventive Medicine (R.D.), UCSD Medical Center, 200 W Arbor Dr, San Diego, CA 92103-8756. From the 1998 RSNA scientific assembly. Received April 14, 2000; revision requested June 6; revision received June 30; accepted August 8. R.D. supported in part by National Institutes of Health grant M01 RR00827. Address correspondence to C.B.S. (e-mail: csirlin@ucsd.edu).

PURPOSE: To assess the importance of free fluid and to determine the accuracy of screening ultrasonography (US) in female patients of reproductive age with trauma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: US was performed in 1,047 patients, aged 10–60 years, to evaluate blunt trauma. Patients were retrospectively assigned to groups on the basis of presence and location of intraperitoneal free fluid. Injury and surgical injury rates were assessed by comparing US results with computed tomographic, repeat US, cystographic, peritoneal lavage, surgical, and/or autopsy findings in 144 patients and with final clinical outcome in 903. US scans were positive if fluid was outside the cul-de-sac or if suspicious parenchymal abnormalities were present.

RESULTS: In 939 patients, no fluid was seen: Eight had injuries; three were surgical. In 56, anechoic fluid was isolated to the cul-de-sac: Two had injuries; one was surgical. In 26, fluid was isolated to the upper abdomen: Fifteen had injuries; five were surgical. In 22, fluid involved the pelvis and abdomen: Nineteen had injuries; 14 were surgical. In four, questionable fluid was isolated to the supravesical space. Patients with fluid in the cul-de-sac had similar injury and surgical injury rates as those with no fluid but had lower rates than those of patients with fluid elsewhere (P < .02 to P < .001). US screening had 89% sensitivity, 98% specificity, 97% accuracy, a 61% positive predictive value, and a 99% negative predictive value.

CONCLUSION: In female patients of reproductive age with trauma, free fluid isolated to the cul-de-sac is likely physiologic; clinical follow-up should suffice. Patients with fluid elsewhere usually have clinically important injury and require further evaluation.

Index terms: Abdomen, injuries, 70.41 • Abdomen, US, 70.1298 • Kidney, injuries, 81.41 • Liver, injuries, 761.41 • Pelvic organs, US, 761.1298, 775.1298 • Peritoneum, fluid, 791.41 • Spleen, injuries, 775.41




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
M. Korner, M. M. Krotz, C. Degenhart, K.-J. Pfeifer, M. F. Reiser, and U. Linsenmaier
Current Role of Emergency US in Patients with Major Trauma
RadioGraphics, January 1, 2008; 28(1): 225 - 242.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
TraumaHome page
C. Whitfield and J.P. Garner
The early management of gunshot wounds Part II: the abdomen, extremities and special situations
Trauma, January 1, 2007; 9(1): 47 - 71.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
N. Farahmand, C. B. Sirlin, M. A. Brown, G. P. Shragg, D. Fortlage, D. B. Hoyt, and G. Casola
Hypotensive Patients with Blunt Abdominal Trauma: Performance of Screening US
Radiology, May 1, 2005; 235(2): 436 - 443.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. R. Richards, E. L. Ormsby, M. V. Romo, M. A. Gillen, and J. P. McGahan
Blunt Abdominal Injury in the Pregnant Patient: Detection with US
Radiology, November 1, 2004; 233(2): 463 - 470.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. B. Sirlin, M. A. Brown, O. A. Andrade-Barreto, R. Deutsch, D. A. Fortlage, D. B. Hoyt, and G. Casola
Blunt Abdominal Trauma: Clinical Value of Negative Screening US Scans
Radiology, March 1, 2004; 230(3): 661 - 668.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. B. Sirlin, M. A. Brown, R. Deutsch, O. A. Andrade-Barreto, D. A. Fortlage, D. B. Hoyt, and G. Casola
Screening US for Blunt Abdominal Trauma: Objective Predictors of False-Negative Findings and Missed Injuries
Radiology, December 1, 2003; 229(3): 766 - 774.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2001 by the Radiological Society of North America.