|
|
||||||||
Gastrointestinal Imaging |
1 From the Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Erwin Rd, Box 3808, Durham, NC 27710. Received June 19, 2000; revision requested July 12; revision received August 17; accepted September 1. Address correspondence to E.K.P. (e-mail: pauls003@mc.duke.edu).
PURPOSE: To compare image quality on transverse source images and coronal and sagittal reformations to determine the feasibility of using singlebreath-hold three-dimensional liver computed tomography (CT) with multidetector row helical CT in patients suspected of having hepatic metastases.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-three patients underwent the protocol. Coronal and sagittal reformations were constructed. Images were reviewed for duration of scan acquisition and length and adequacy of z-axis coverage. Reformations were scored for visualization of portal and hepatic vein branches, liver edge sharpness, cardiac pulsation and respiratory motion artifacts, noise due to mottle, and overall impression.
RESULTS: Mean z-axis coverage was 207 mm ± 33 (SD) (range, 145280 mm), with a mean acquisition time of 10.96 seconds ± 1.78 (range, 7.7314.93 seconds). In 44 (83%) patients, the entire liver was imaged on a single helical scan. Artifact from cardiac motion was not identified on the transverse source images in any patient but was identified on coronal images in eight (15%) and on sagittal images in seven (13%). Similarly, noise due to mottle was not identified on the transverse source images but was identified on coronal images in seven (13%) patients and on sagittal images in six (11%).
CONCLUSION: It is feasible to perform singlebreath-hold three-dimensional liver CT with multidetector row helical CT technology. Reformations provide a unique perspective with which to view the liver and may improve diagnostic capacity.
Index terms: Computed tomography (CT), helical, 761.12115 Computed tomography (CT), image quality Computed tomography (CT), technology Computed tomography (CT), three-dimensional, 761.12117 Liver, CT, 761.12112, 761.12115, 761.12117 Liver neoplasms, metastases, 761.33
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. H. Kim, S. H. Kim, J. Lee, M. J. Kim, Y. H. Jeon, Y. Park, D. Choi, W. J. Lee, and H. K. Lim Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI Versus Triple-Phase MDCT for the Preoperative Detection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2009; 192(6): 1675 - 1681. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Marin, C. Catalano, G. De Filippis, M. Di Martino, A. Guerrisi, M. Rossi, and R. Passariello Detection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients with Cirrhosis: Added Value of Coronal Reformations from Isotropic Voxels with 64-MDCT Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2009; 192(1): 180 - 187. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K Hashimoto, S Kawashima, S Kameoka, Y Akiyama, T Honjoya, K Ejima, and K Sawada Comparison of image validity between cone beam computed tomography for dental use and multidetector row helical computed tomography Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., December 1, 2007; 36(8): 465 - 471. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K Imai, M Ikeda, S Wada, Y Enchi, and T Niimi Analysis of streak artefacts on CT images using statistics of extremes Br. J. Radiol., November 1, 2007; 80(959): 911 - 918. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Memarsadeghi, C. Schaefer-Prokop, M. Prokop, T. H. Helbich, C. C. Seitz, I. M. Noebauer-Huhmann, and G. Heinz-Peer Unenhanced MDCT in Patients with Suspected Urinary Stone Disease: Do Coronal Reformations Improve Diagnostic Performance? Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2007; 189(2): W60 - W64. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. T. Johnson and E. K. Fishman IV Contrast Selection for MDCT: Current Thoughts and Practice Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2006; 186(2): 406 - 415. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. K. Paulson, J. P. Harris, T. A. Jaffe, P. A. Haugan, and R. C. Nelson Acute Appendicitis: Added Diagnostic Value of Coronal Reformations from Isotropic Voxels at Multi-Detector Row CT Radiology, June 1, 2005; 235(3): 879 - 885. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. H. Kim, D. Choi, S. H. Kim, J. H. Lim, W. J. Lee, M. J. Kim, H. K. Lim, and S. J. Lee Ferucarbotran-Enhanced MRI Versus Triple-Phase MDCT for the Preoperative Detection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2005; 184(4): 1069 - 1076. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. S. Gazelle, P. M. McMahon, M. T. Beinfeld, E. F. Halpern, and M. C. Weinstein Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma: Cost-effectiveness of Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation versus That of Hepatic Resection Radiology, December 1, 2004; 233(3): 729 - 739. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. J. Stemmler, E. K. Paulson, F. J. Thornton, S. R. Winters, R. C. Nelson, and B. M. Clary Dual-Phase 3D MDCT Angiography for Evaluation of the Liver Before Hepatic Resection Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2004; 183(6): 1551 - 1557. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. K. Paulson, T. A. Jaffe, J. Thomas, J. P. Harris, and R. C. Nelson MDCT of Patients with Acute Abdominal Pain: A New Perspective Using Coronal Reformations from Submillimeter Isotropic Voxels Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2004; 183(4): 899 - 906. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Izzo, P. Marra, G. Beneduce, G. Castello, P. Vallone, V. De Rosa, F. Cremona, C. M. Ensor, F. W. Holtsberg, J. S. Bomalaski, et al. Pegylated Arginine Deiminase Treatment of Patients With Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Results From Phase I/II Studies J. Clin. Oncol., May 15, 2004; 22(10): 1815 - 1822. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Ichikawa, T. Kitamura, H. Nakajima, H. Sou, T. Tsukamoto, S. Ikenaga, and T. Araki Hypervascular Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Can Double Arterial Phase Imaging with Multidetector CT Improve Tumor Depiction in the Cirrhotic Liver? Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2002; 179(3): 751 - 758. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. S. Katz and M. Hon CT Angiography of the Lower Extremities and Aortoiliac System with a Multi-Detector Row Helical CT Scanner: Promise of New Opportunities Fulfilled Radiology, October 1, 2001; 221(1): 7 - 10. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||