HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Abrahams, J. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Abrahams, J. J.

Dental CT Imaging: A Look at the Jaw¹

¹ From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St (CB-30), PO Box 208042, New Haven, CT 06520-8042. Received May 13, 1999; revision requested June 29; revision received January 20, 2000; accepted February 11. Address correspondence to the author (e-mail: abrahams@biomed.med.yale.edu).

The jaw comprises two complex bony structures: the mandible and maxilla. Their curved or archlike configuration makes radiographic imaging difficult. Furthermore, the superimposition of dense teeth and roots may obscure underlying tissues, and streak artifacts from dental restorations often degrade computed tomographic (CT) images. Recently, dental CT reformatting programs that use thin transverse images of the jaw to reformat multiple panoramic and cross-sectional views were developed. Since images are reformatted, streak artifacts that degrade bone visualization at direct coronal CT are projected over the crowns of the teeth, permitting optimal viewing of bone. As a result, these programs have been successfully used to evaluate implants, cysts, tumors, and surgical procedures. They have created not only a new modality for viewing the jaw but also a new partnership between dentists and radiologists. Questions that cannot be answered in the dentist’s office with conventional radiographs are now answered in radiology departments with dental CT scans. The objective of this article is to trace, with a series of examples, the effect that this imaging modality has had on radiographic evaluation of the jaw and to provide the reader with knowledge that should enable him or her to become more involved in imaging of the jaw.

Index terms: Computed tomography (CT), computer programs • Computed tomography (CT), thin-section • Jaws, abnormalities, 241.38, 241.45, 243.38, 243.45 • Jaws, CT, 241.1211, 241.127, 243.1211, 243.127 • Jaws, neoplasms, 24.38 • Review

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R A Mischkowski, P Scherer, L Ritter, J Neugebauer, E Keeve, and J E Zoller Diagnostic quality of multiplanar reformations obtained with a newly developed cone beam device for maxillofacial imaging Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., January 1, 2008; 37(1): 1 - 9. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A Suomalainen, T Vehmas, M Kortesniemi, S Robinson, and J Peltola Accuracy of linear measurements using dental cone beam and conventional multislice computed tomography Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., January 1, 2008; 37(1): 10 - 17. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I Ogura, T Kurabayashi, T Sasaki, T Amagasa, N Okada, and T Kaneda Maxillary bone invasion by gingival carcinoma as an indicator of cervical metastasis Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., September 1, 2003; 32(5): 291 - 294. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]