|
|
||||||||
Vascular and Interventional Radiology |
1 From the Departments of Cardiology (M.G., B.J.M.M.), Radiology (B.V.), and Medical Physics (J.A.E.S.), Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; the Departments of Cardiology (M.G., E.E.v.d.W.), Radiology (M.G., A.d.R.), and Biostatistics (A.H.Z.), Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 AA Leiden, the Netherlands; and the Department of Cardiology, Nijmegen University Hospital, the Netherlands (J.T.). Received June 1, 2000; revision requested July 17; final revision received October 30; accepted November 20. M.G. supported by the Interuniversity Cardiology Institute of the Netherlands and the SORBO Heart Foundation. Address correspondence to A.d.R. (e-mail: a.de_roos@lumc.nl).
PURPOSE: To investigate the feasibility of magnetic resonance (MR) flow mapping in the assessment of aortic biophysical properties in patients with Marfan syndrome and to detect differences in biophysical properties in the normal-sized aorta distal to the aortic root between these patients and matched control subjects.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-eight patients with Marfan syndrome with aortic root dilatation and 23 matched control subjects underwent MR flow mapping in four locations in the normal-sized aorta (1, ascending aorta; 2, thoracic descending aorta; 3, descending aorta at the level of the diaphragm; and 4, abdominal descending aorta). Distensibility at each location and flow wave velocity between locations were calculated.
RESULTS: Compared with the control subjects, patients with Marfan syndrome had decreased aortic distensibility at three of the four locations (levels 1, 2, and 4; P < .05) and increased flow wave velocity between all locations (P < .05) in the aorta. In patients with Marfan syndrome, flow wave velocity was also significantly increased along the entire aortic tract beyond the aortic root (from level 1 to level 4).
CONCLUSION: MR imaging reveals abnormal biophysical properties of the normal-sized aorta in patients with Marfan syndrome. Monitoring of these properties is relevant for evaluating disease progression and treatment options.
Index terms: Aorta, flow dynamics Aorta, MR, 941.129411, 941.129412, 941.12944, 943.129411, 943.129412, 943.12944 Magnetic resonance (MR), vascular studies, 941.129411, 941.129412, 941.12944, 943.129411, 943.129412, 943.12944 Marfan syndrome, 941.1971, 943.1971
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Nistri, J. Grande-Allen, M. Noale, C. Basso, P. Siviero, S. Maggi, G. Crepaldi, and G. Thiene Aortic elasticity and size in bicuspid aortic valve syndrome Eur. Heart J., February 2, 2008; 29(4): 472 - 479. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Ou, D. S. Celermajer, O. Raisky, O. Jolivet, F. Buyens, A. Herment, D. Sidi, D. Bonnet, and E. Mousseaux Angular (Gothic) aortic arch leads to enhanced systolic wave reflection, central aortic stiffness, and increased left ventricular mass late after aortic coarctation repair: Evaluation with magnetic resonance flow mapping J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., January 1, 2008; 135(1): 62 - 68. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. A. Pape, T. T. Tsai, E. M. Isselbacher, J. K. Oh, P. T. O'Gara, A. Evangelista, R. Fattori, G. Meinhardt, S. Trimarchi, E. Bossone, et al. Aortic Diameter >=5.5 cm Is Not a Good Predictor of Type A Aortic Dissection: Observations From the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD) Circulation, September 4, 2007; 116(10): 1120 - 1127. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. I. Ha, J. B. Seo, S. H. Lee, J.-W. Kang, H. W. Goo, T.-H. Lim, and M. J. Shin Imaging of Marfan Syndrome: Multisystemic Manifestations RadioGraphics, July 1, 2007; 27(4): 989 - 1004. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J De Backer, G J Nollen, D Devos, G Pals, P Coucke, K Verstraete, E E van der Wall, A De Paepe, and B J M Mulder Variability of aortic stiffness is not associated with the fibrillin 1 genotype in patients with Marfan's syndrome. Heart, July 1, 2006; 92(7): 977 - 978. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Segers, J. De Backer, D. Devos, S. I. Rabben, T. C. Gillebert, L. M. Van Bortel, J De Sutter, A. De Paepe, and P. R. Verdonck Aortic reflection coefficients and their association with global indexes of wave reflection in healthy controls and patients with Marfan's syndrome Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, June 1, 2006; 290(6): H2385 - H2392. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A P Patrianakos, D N Karakitsos, E de Groot, F I Parthenakis, E K Daphnis, and P E Vardas Alteration of proximal aorta biophysical properties in patients with end stage renal disease Heart, February 1, 2006; 92(2): 228 - 232. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. F. Immer, U. Hagen, P. A. Berdat, F. S. Eckstein, and T. P. Carrel Risk factors for secondary dilatation of the aorta after acute type A aortic dissection Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2005; 27(4): 654 - 657. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. J. Nollen, M. Groenink, J. G.P. Tijssen, E. E. van der Wall, and B. J.M. Mulder Aortic stiffness and diameter predict progressive aortic dilatation in patients with Marfan syndrome Eur. Heart J., July 1, 2004; 25(13): 1146 - 1152. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G J Nollen, B E Westerhof, M Groenink, A Osnabrugge, E E van der Wall, and B J M Mulder Aortic pressure-area relation in Marfan patients with and without {beta} blocking agents: a new non-invasive approach Heart, March 1, 2004; 90(3): 314 - 318. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. F. Immer, A. G. Bansi, A. S. Immer-Bansi, J. McDougall, K. J. Zehr, H. V. Schaff, and T. P. Carrel Aortic dissection in pregnancy: analysis of risk factors and outcome Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2003; 76(1): 309 - 314. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |