|
|
||||||||
Technical Developments |
1 From the Departments of Radiology (R.A.K.H., S.W., L.C., B.M.), Obstetrics (A.R., R.C.), and Biostatistics (B.S.), University Hospital Zürich, Rämistrasse 100, CH-8091 Zürich, Switzerland. Received June 19, 2000; revision requested July 24; revision received August 16; accepted September 12. Supported by a grant from EMDO Stiftung, Zurich, Switzerland. Address correspondence to R.A.K.H. (e-mail: rahel.kubik@dmr.usz.ch).
In 22 fetuses, three-dimensional reconstruction was performed on the basis of T2-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) data sets by using a surface-rendering technique. Fetuses and uteroplacental units were segmented manually; volumes were calculated automatically. Three-dimensional reconstruction and volumetry of the fetus and uteroplacental unit are feasible with MR data sets. MR estimates correlated closely with ultrasonographic fetal biometric estimates and birth weight.
Index terms: Fetus, MR, 856.121416 Magnetic resonance (MR), three-dimensional, 856.12141 Pregnancy, MR, 856.121416
Related Article
Radiology 2001 219: 313-315.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Hassibi, N. Farhataziz, M. Zaretsky, D. McIntire, and D. M. Twickler Optimization of Fetal Weight Estimates Using MRI: Comparison of Acquisitions Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2004; 183(2): 487 - 492. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. F. Reichel, R. M. Ramus, J. T. Caire, L. S. Hynan, K. P. Magee, and D. M. Twickler Fetal Central Nervous System Biometry on MR Imaging Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2003; 180(4): 1155 - 1158. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. M. Keller, A. Rake, S. C. A. Michel, B. Seifert, G. Efe, K. Treiber, R. Huch, B. Marincek, and R. A. Kubik-Huch Obstetric MR Pelvimetry: Reference Values and Evaluation of Inter- and Intraobserver Error and Intraindividual Variability Radiology, April 1, 2003; 227(1): 37 - 43. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Levine Three-dimensional Fetal MR Imaging: Will It Fulfill Its Promise? Radiology, May 1, 2001; 219(2): 313 - 315. [Full Text] |
||||