Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aoki, J.
Right arrow Articles by Endo, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Aoki, J.
Right arrow Articles by Endo, K.
(Radiology. 2001;219:774-777.)
© RSNA, 2001


Nuclear Medicine

FDG PET of Primary Benign and Malignant Bone Tumors: Standardized Uptake Value in 52 Lesions1

Jun Aoki, MD, Hideomi Watanabe, MD, Tetsuya Shinozaki, MD, Kenji Takagishi, MD, Hideyuki Ishijima, MD, Nariyuki Oya, MD, Noriko Sato, MD, Tomio Inoue, MD and Keigo Endo, MD

1 From the Departments of Diagnostic Radiology (J.A., H.I., N.O., N.S., K.E.), Orthopedic Surgery (H.W., T.S., K.T.), and Nuclear Medicine (T.I., K.E.), Gunma University School of Medicine, 3-39-22 Showa-machi, Maebashi 371-8511, Japan. From the 2000 RSNA scientific assembly. Received May 11, 2000; revision requested June 19; revision received August 4; accepted September 12. Address correspondence to J.A. (e-mail: junaoki@showa.gunma-u.ac.jp).

PURPOSE: To evaluate the standardized uptake value (SUV) of 2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) at positron emission tomography (PET) in the differentiation of benign from malignant bone lesions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-two (19 malignant, 33 benign) primary bone lesions were examined with FDG PET prior to tissue diagnosis. The SUVs were calculated and compared between benign and malignant lesions and among histologic subgroups that included more than four cases.

RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference in SUV between benign (2.18 ± 1.52 [SD]) and malignant (4.34 ± 3.19) lesions in total (P = .002). However, giant cell tumors (n = 5; SUV, 4.64 ± 1.05) showed significantly higher SUV than chondrosarcomas (n = 7; SUV, 2.23 ± 0.74) (P = .036, adjusted for multiple comparisons) and had no statistically significant difference in SUV compared with osteosarcomas (n = 6; SUV, 3.07 ± 0.96) (P = .171). There was no statistically significant difference in SUV between fibrous dysplasias (n = 6; SUV, 2.05 ± 0.98) and osteosarcoma (P = .127) or chondrosarcomas (P = .667). Although the number of cases was small, three chondroblastomas, one sarcoidosis, and one Langerhans cell histiocytosis showed levels of FDG accumulation as high as that of osteosarcomas.

CONCLUSION: Radiologists should be aware of the high accumulation of FDG in some benign bone lesions, especially histiocytic or giant cell–containing lesions. Consideration of histologic subtypes should be included in analysis of SUV at FDG PET of primary bone tumors.

Index terms: Bone neoplasms, diagnosis, 40.31, 40.32 • Bone neoplasms, PET, 40.12163 • Bone neoplasms, radionuclide studies, 40.12163 • Fluorine, radioactive




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
E. M. Chung, M. D. Murphey, C. S. Specht, R. Cube, and J. Smirniotopoulos
From the Archives of the AFIP * Pediatric Orbit Tumors and Tumorlike Lesions: Osseous Lesions of the Orbit
RadioGraphics, July 1, 2008; 28(4): 1193 - 1214.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
A. K. Buck, K. Herrmann, C. M. z. Buschenfelde, M. E. Juweid, M. Bischoff, G. Glatting, G. Weirich, P. Moller, H.-J. Wester, K. Scheidhauer, et al.
Imaging Bone and Soft Tissue Tumors with the Proliferation Marker [18F]Fluorodeoxythymidine
Clin. Cancer Res., May 15, 2008; 14(10): 2970 - 2977.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. A. Bredella, M. Torriani, F. Hornicek, H. A. Ouellette, W. E. Plamer, Z. Williams, A. J. Fischman, and S. R. Plotkin
Value of PET in the Assessment of Patients with Neurofibromatosis Type 1
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2007; 189(4): 928 - 935.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. Biswal, D. L. Resnick, J. M. Hoffman, and S. S. Gambhir
Molecular Imaging: Integration of Molecular Imaging into the Musculoskeletal Imaging Practice
Radiology, September 1, 2007; 244(3): 651 - 671.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
K. Kuwahara, S. Izawa, H. Murabe, N. Murakami, T. Yokota, Y. Wani, K. Notohara, C. Tsukayama, T. Ishimori, and Y. Watanabe
Increased 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Uptake in a Brown Tumor in a Patient with Primary Hyperparathyroidism
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2007; 92(7): 2408 - 2409.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. W. Hetts, S. D. Hilchey, R. Wilson, and B. Franc
Case 110: Nonossifying Fibroma
Radiology, April 1, 2007; 243(1): 288 - 292.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CA Cancer J ClinHome page
R. K. Heck Jr., T. D. Peabody, and M. A. Simon
Staging of Primary Malignancies of Bone
CA Cancer J Clin, November 1, 2006; 56(6): 366 - 375.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nucl. Med. Technol.Home page
M. M. Abouzied, E. S. Crawford, and H. A. Nabi
18F-FDG Imaging: Pitfalls and Artifacts
J. Nucl. Med. Technol., September 1, 2005; 33(3): 145 - 155.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
E. Even-Sapir
Imaging of Malignant Bone Involvement by Morphologic, Scintigraphic, and Hybrid Modalities
J. Nucl. Med., August 1, 2005; 46(8): 1356 - 1367.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
F. Y.-I. Lee, J. Yu, S.-S. Chang, R. Fawwaz, and M. V. Parisien
Diagnostic Value and Limitations of Fluorine-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography for Cartilaginous Tumors of Bone
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., December 1, 2004; 86(12): 2677 - 2685.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
R. Boellaard, N. C. Krak, O. S. Hoekstra, and A. A. Lammertsma
Effects of Noise, Image Resolution, and ROI Definition on the Accuracy of Standard Uptake Values: A Simulation Study
J. Nucl. Med., September 1, 2004; 45(9): 1519 - 1527.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
L. G. Strauss, A. Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss, D. Koczan, L. Bernd, U. Haberkorn, V. Ewerbeck, and H.-J. Thiesen
18F-FDG Kinetics and Gene Expression in Giant Cell Tumors
J. Nucl. Med., September 1, 2004; 45(9): 1528 - 1535.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
M. D. Murphey, E. A. Walker, A. J. Wilson, M. J. Kransdorf, H. T. Temple, and F. H. Gannon
From the Archives of the AFIP: Imaging of Primary Chondrosarcoma: Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation
RadioGraphics, September 1, 2003; 23(5): 1245 - 1278.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
W. Brenner, K. H. Bohuslavizki, and J. F. Eary
PET Imaging of Osteosarcoma
J. Nucl. Med., June 1, 2003; 44(6): 930 - 942.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GutHome page
M Hoffmann, H Vogelsang, K Kletter, G Zettinig, A Chott, and M Raderer
18F-fluoro-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG-PET) for assessment of enteropathy-type T cell lymphoma
Gut, March 1, 2003; 52(3): 347 - 351.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. A. Bredella, G. R. Caputo, and L. S. Steinbach
Value of FDG Positron Emission Tomography in Conjunction with MR Imaging for Evaluating Therapy Response in Patients with Musculoskeletal Sarcomas
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2002; 179(5): 1145 - 1150.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
C. Franzius, S. Bielack, S. Flege, J. Sciuk, H. Jurgens, and O. Schober
Prognostic Significance of 18F-FDG and 99mTc-Methylene Diphosphonate Uptake in Primary Osteosarcoma
J. Nucl. Med., August 1, 2002; 43(8): 1012 - 1017.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2001 by the Radiological Society of North America.