|
|
||||||||
Breast Imaging |
1 From the Department of Radiology, Breast Imaging and Interventional Center, George Washington University Medical Center, 2150 Pennsylvania Ave, Washington, DC 20037 (R.F.B.); the Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science (J.M.S., A.N., O.M.B.G.); and the Departments of Oncology (S.N.G.) and Pathology (F.B.A.), Breast Imaging and Interventional Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Md. Received April 7, 2000; revision requested May 26; final revision received December 18; accepted January 4, 2001. Address correspondence to R.F.B. (e-mail: radrfb@gwumc.edu).
PURPOSE: To compare the accuracy of diagnosis of invasive breast cancer with 11- and 8-gauge stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsy (SVAB) devices and to correlate lesion diameter and accuracy of breast cancer diagnosis at SVAB.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: During a 22-month period, 489 SVAB procedures were performed with an 11-gauge probe and 305 with an 8-gauge probe. SVAB and surgical pathologic results of 104 breast carcinomas were reviewed and correlated with lesion size, number of specimens obtained, and type of SVAB probe used.
RESULTS: Four of 38 ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) lesions diagnosed with 11-gauge SVAB demonstrated invasion at surgery, whereas one of 23 DCIS lesions diagnosed with 8-gauge SVAB demonstrated invasion at surgery (P = .6). A mean of 12 specimens per lesion were obtained in each group. In lesions 30 mm or larger, the underestimation rate for DCIS was 43% (three of seven) with 11-gauge SVAB and 17% (one of six) with 8-gauge SVAB (P = .6). Overall, the rate of underestimation for DCIS was significantly higher in lesions 30 mm or larger (four of 13) than in smaller lesions (one of 48, P = .006).
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated no difference in breast cancer diagnosis with the 8- and 11-gauge SVAB systems, but the accuracy of breast cancer diagnosis was greater in lesions smaller than 30 mm than in larger lesions.
Index terms: Biopsies, technology, 00.1267 Breast, biopsy, 00.1267 Breast, diseases, 00.71, 00.72 Breast neoplasms, diagnosis, 00.31, 00.32
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E A Rakha and I O Ellis An overview of assessment of prognostic and predictive factors in breast cancer needle core biopsy specimens J. Clin. Pathol., December 1, 2007; 60(12): 1300 - 1306. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. P. Lourenco, M. B. Mainiero, E. Lazarus, D. Giri, and B. Schepps Stereotactic Breast Biopsy: Comparison of Histologic Underestimation Rates with 11- and 9-Gauge Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2007; 189(5): W275 - W279. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. M. Lomoschitz, T. H. Helbich, M. Rudas, G. Pfarl, K. F. Linnau, A. Stadler, and R. J. Jackman Stereotactic 11-gauge Vacuum-assisted Breast Biopsy: Influence of Number of Specimens on Diagnostic Accuracy Radiology, September 1, 2004; 232(3): 897 - 903. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. Soo, J. A. Baker, and E. L. Rosen Sonographic Detection and Sonographically Guided Biopsy of Breast Microcalcifications Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2003; 180(4): 941 - 948. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Pandelidis, D. Heilman, D. Jones, K. Stough, J. Trapeni, and Y. Suliman Accuracy of 11-Gauge Vacuum-Assisted Core Biopsy of Mammographic Breast Lesions Ann. Surg. Oncol., January 1, 2003; 10(1): 43 - 47. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |