Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Applegate, K. E.
Right arrow Articles by Grisoni, E. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Applegate, K. E.
Right arrow Articles by Grisoni, E. R.
(Radiology. 2001;220:103-107.)
© RSNA, 2001


Pediatric Imaging

Effect of Cross-sectional Imaging on Negative Appendectomy and Perforation Rates in Children1

Kimberly E. Applegate, MD, Carlos J. Sivit, MD, Ann E. Salvator, MS, Valerie J. Borisa, MBA, David L. Dudgeon, MD, Anthony E. Stallion, MD and Enrique R. Grisoni, MD

1 From the Departments of Radiology (K.E.A., C.J.S., V.J.B.), Pediatrics (A. E. Salvator), and Surgery (D.L.D., A. E. Stallion, E.R.G.), Rainbow Babies and Children’s Hospital of the University Hospitals of Cleveland and Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, 11100 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44106-5056. Received September 28, 2000; revision requested November 4; revision received January 2, 2001; accepted February 6. K.E.A. was supported in part by the American Roentgen Ray Society Scholar Award. Address correspondence to K.E.A. (e-mail: applegate@uhrad.com).

PURPOSE: To compare negative appendectomy and perforation rates in children who underwent ultrasonography (US), computed tomography (CT), or no imaging before urgent appendectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: All children who underwent urgent appendectomy during a 41/2-year period were identified in a surgical billing database. Pathology reports were coded as negative or as showing acute inflammation or perforation. Imaging up to 14 days before appendectomy or abscess drainage was noted, and imaging-based diagnoses were compared with pathologic findings. Patient age and sex were recorded.

RESULTS: Two hundred ninety-nine children, 176 (59%) male and 123 (41%) female (mean age, 10.4 years; age range, 1–21 years), underwent urgent appendectomy. One hundred twenty-six (42%) underwent no imaging, 121 (41%) underwent US with or without CT, and 52 (17%) underwent CT only; 44 (15%) underwent both US and CT. There were significantly higher rates of appendectomy with normal pathologic findings ("negative appendectomy") in patients who underwent no imaging (14% [18 of 126]) or US (17% [20 of 121]) versus the rates in those who underwent CT only (2% [one of 52]) (P = .02 and P = .007, respectively). The negative appendectomy rate was 7% in 96 patients who underwent CT with or without prior US. The perforation rates were not significantly different.

CONCLUSION: As compared with children who underwent no preoperative imaging and those who underwent US, children who underwent CT had a significantly lower negative appendectomy rate, without a significantly higher perforation rate.

Index terms: Appendicitis, 751.291 • Appendix, CT, 751.1211, 751.12112 • Appendix, US, 751.1298 • Computed tomography (CT), in infants and children, 751.12111, 751.12112 • Ultrasound (US), in infants and children, 751.1298




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PediatricsHome page
A. B. Kharbanda, G. A. Taylor, S. J. Fishman, and R. G. Bachur
A Clinical Decision Rule to Identify Children at Low Risk for Appendicitis
Pediatrics, September 1, 2005; 116(3): 709 - 716.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
T. A. Ponsky, Z. J. Huang, K. Kittle, M. R. Eichelberger, J. C. Gilbert, F. Brody, and K. D. Newman
Hospital- and Patient-Level Characteristics and the Risk of Appendiceal Rupture and Negative Appendectomy in Children
JAMA, October 27, 2004; 292(16): 1977 - 1982.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
B. Siewert, V. Raptopoulos, S.-I. Liu, R. A. Hodin, R. B. Davis, and M. P. Rosen
CT Predictors of Failed Laparoscopic Appendectomy
Radiology, November 1, 2003; 229(2): 415 - 420.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
T. Rettenbacher, A. Hollerweger, P. Macheiner, N. Gritzmann, M. Daniaux, K. Schwamberger, H. Ulmer, and D. z. Nedden
Ovoid Shape of the Vermiform Appendix: A Criterion to Exclude Acute Appendicitis--Evaluation with US
Radiology, January 1, 2003; 226(1): 95 - 100.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. Puig, M. Hormann, W. Rebhandl, R. Felder-Puig, M. Prokop, and K. Paya
US as a Primary Diagnostic Tool in Relation to Negative Appendectomy: Six Years Experience
Radiology, January 1, 2003; 226(1): 101 - 104.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. E. Bendeck, M. Nino-Murcia, G. J. Berry, and R. B. Jeffrey Jr
Imaging for Suspected Appendicitis: Negative Appendectomy and Perforation Rates
Radiology, October 1, 2002; 225(1): 131 - 136.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2001 by the Radiological Society of North America.