Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Binkert, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Hodler, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Binkert, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Hodler, J.
(Radiology. 2001;220:219-224.)
© RSNA, 2001


Musculoskeletal Imaging

MR Arthrography of the Glenohumeral Joint: Two Concentrations of Gadoteridol versus Ringer Solution as the Intraarticular Contrast Material1

Christoph A. Binkert, MD, Marco Zanetti, MD, Christian Gerber, MD and Juerg Hodler, MD

1 From the Departments of Radiology (C.A.B., M.Z., J.H.) and Orthopedic Surgery (C.G.), University Hospital Balgrist, Forchstrasse 340, CH-8008 Zurich, Switzerland. Received July 6, 2000; revision requested August 19; final revision received January 8, 2001; accepted January 16. Address correspondence to C.A.B., Dotter Interventional Institute, Oregon Health Sciences University, L605, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR 97201-3098 (e-mail: binkert@compuserve.com).

PURPOSE: To compare two concentrations of gadoteridol with Ringer solution as the contrast material for magnetic resonance (MR) arthrography of the glenohumeral joint.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred fifty-six consecutive MR arthrograms were randomly obtained with either 2 mmol/L gadoteridol (n = 52), 4 mmol/L gadoteridol (n = 52), or Ringer solution (n = 52). MR arthrograms were assessed quantitatively (for contrast-to-noise ratio [CNR]) and qualitatively (for overall image quality, image contrast, degree of joint distention, and motion artifacts). MR diagnoses were compared with arthroscopic or surgical reports in 88 patients.

RESULTS: The mean CNR at imaging was 40.4 with 2 mmol/L gadoteridol, 45.6 with 4 mmol/L gadoteridol, and 48.7 with Ringer solution. The CNR with 2 mmol/L gadoteridol was significantly lower than that with 4 mmol/L gadoteridol (P = .025) and Ringer solution (P = .012). Qualitative differences between the two gadoteridol concentrations were not significant. Ringer solution was significantly worse with regard to overall quality, motion artifacts, image contrast, and joint distention compared with both gadoteridol concentrations. Ringer solution was slightly more sensitive and less specific than the gadoteridol solutions in the detection of supraspinatus tears and less sensitive and more specific in enabling diagnosis of superior labrum anteroposterior lesions.

CONCLUSION: MR arthrograms of the shoulder obtained with gadoteridol and those obtained with Ringer solution provided equivalent diagnostic accuracy. The authors, however, preferred the image quality of the gadoteridol-enhanced arthrograms.

Index terms: Arthrography, contrast media, 414.122 • Contrast media, comparative studies • Gadolinium • Magnetic resonance (MR), arthrography, 414.121411, 414.121415, 414.12143 • Shoulder, arthrography, 414.122 • Tendons, injuries, 414.41, 414.481




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
G. Andreisek, J. M. Froehlich, J. Hodler, D. Weishaupt, V. Beutler, C. W. A. Pfirrmann, C. Boesch, and D. Nanz
Direct MR Arthrography at 1.5 and 3.0 T: Signal Dependence on Gadolinium and Iodine Concentrations--Phantom Study
Radiology, June 1, 2008; 247(3): 706 - 716.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
G. Andreisek, S. R. Duc, J. M. Froehlich, J. Hodler, and D. Weishaupt
MR Arthrography of the Shoulder, Hip, and Wrist: Evaluation of Contrast Dynamics and Image Quality with Increasing Injection-to-Imaging Time
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2007; 188(4): 1081 - 1088.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
T. R. McCauley
MR Imaging Evaluation of the Postoperative Knee
Radiology, January 1, 2005; 234(1): 53 - 61.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
A. V. R. Mohana-Borges, C. B. Chung, and D. Resnick
MR Imaging and MR Arthrography of the Postoperative Shoulder: Spectrum of Normal and Abnormal Findings
RadioGraphics, January 1, 2004; 24(1): 69 - 85.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2001 by the Radiological Society of North America.