|
|
||||||||
Musculoskeletal Imaging |
1 From the Departments of Radiology (C.A.B., M.Z., J.H.) and Orthopedic Surgery (C.G.), University Hospital Balgrist, Forchstrasse 340, CH-8008 Zurich, Switzerland. Received July 6, 2000; revision requested August 19; final revision received January 8, 2001; accepted January 16. Address correspondence to C.A.B., Dotter Interventional Institute, Oregon Health Sciences University, L605, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR 97201-3098 (e-mail: binkert@compuserve.com).
PURPOSE: To compare two concentrations of gadoteridol with Ringer solution as the contrast material for magnetic resonance (MR) arthrography of the glenohumeral joint.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred fifty-six consecutive MR arthrograms were randomly obtained with either 2 mmol/L gadoteridol (n = 52), 4 mmol/L gadoteridol (n = 52), or Ringer solution (n = 52). MR arthrograms were assessed quantitatively (for contrast-to-noise ratio [CNR]) and qualitatively (for overall image quality, image contrast, degree of joint distention, and motion artifacts). MR diagnoses were compared with arthroscopic or surgical reports in 88 patients.
RESULTS: The mean CNR at imaging was 40.4 with 2 mmol/L gadoteridol, 45.6 with 4 mmol/L gadoteridol, and 48.7 with Ringer solution. The CNR with 2 mmol/L gadoteridol was significantly lower than that with 4 mmol/L gadoteridol (P = .025) and Ringer solution (P = .012). Qualitative differences between the two gadoteridol concentrations were not significant. Ringer solution was significantly worse with regard to overall quality, motion artifacts, image contrast, and joint distention compared with both gadoteridol concentrations. Ringer solution was slightly more sensitive and less specific than the gadoteridol solutions in the detection of supraspinatus tears and less sensitive and more specific in enabling diagnosis of superior labrum anteroposterior lesions.
CONCLUSION: MR arthrograms of the shoulder obtained with gadoteridol and those obtained with Ringer solution provided equivalent diagnostic accuracy. The authors, however, preferred the image quality of the gadoteridol-enhanced arthrograms.
Index terms: Arthrography, contrast media, 414.122 Contrast media, comparative studies Gadolinium Magnetic resonance (MR), arthrography, 414.121411, 414.121415, 414.12143 Shoulder, arthrography, 414.122 Tendons, injuries, 414.41, 414.481
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. O. de Jesus, L. Parker, A. J. Frangos, and L. N. Nazarian Accuracy of MRI, MR Arthrography, and Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Rotator Cuff Tears: A Meta-Analysis Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2009; 192(6): 1701 - 1707. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Andreisek, J. M. Froehlich, J. Hodler, D. Weishaupt, V. Beutler, C. W. A. Pfirrmann, C. Boesch, and D. Nanz Direct MR Arthrography at 1.5 and 3.0 T: Signal Dependence on Gadolinium and Iodine Concentrations--Phantom Study Radiology, June 1, 2008; 247(3): 706 - 716. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Andreisek, S. R. Duc, J. M. Froehlich, J. Hodler, and D. Weishaupt MR Arthrography of the Shoulder, Hip, and Wrist: Evaluation of Contrast Dynamics and Image Quality with Increasing Injection-to-Imaging Time Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2007; 188(4): 1081 - 1088. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. R. McCauley MR Imaging Evaluation of the Postoperative Knee Radiology, January 1, 2005; 234(1): 53 - 61. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. V. R. Mohana-Borges, C. B. Chung, and D. Resnick MR Imaging and MR Arthrography of the Postoperative Shoulder: Spectrum of Normal and Abnormal Findings RadioGraphics, January 1, 2004; 24(1): 69 - 85. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||