|
|
||||||||
Experimental Studies |
1 From the Department of Radiology, Brigham and Womens Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115. Received November 15, 2000; revision requested December 26; revision received February 16, 2001; accepted March 23. Supported by NCI research grant CA76550. Address correspondence to K.H. (e-mail: kullervo@bwh.harvard.edu).
PURPOSE: To determine if focused ultrasound beams can be used to locally open the blood-brain barrier without damage to surrounding brain tissue and if magnetic resonance (MR) imaging can be used to monitor this procedure.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The brains of 18 rabbits were sonicated (pulsed sonication) in four to six locations, with temporal peak acoustic power ranging from 0.2 to 11.5 W. Prior to each sonication, a bolus of ultrasonographic (US) contrast agent was injected into the ear vein of the rabbit. A series of fast or spoiled gradient-echo MR images were obtained during the sonications to monitor the temperature elevation and potential tissue changes. Contrast materialenhanced MR images obtained minutes after sonications and repeated 148 hours later were used to depict blood-brain barrier opening. Whole brain histologic evaluation was performed.
RESULTS: Opening of the blood-brain barrier was confirmed with detection of MR imaging contrast agent at the targeted locations. The lowest power levels used produced blood-brain barrier opening without damage to the surrounding neurons. Contrast enhancement correlated with the focal signal intensity changes in the magnitude fast spoiled gradient-echo MR images.
CONCLUSION: The blood-brain barrier can be consistently opened with focused ultrasound exposures in the presence of a US contrast agent. MR imaging signal intensity changes may be useful in the detection of blood-brain barrier opening during sonication.
Index terms: Blood-brain barrier Experimental study Magnetic resonance (MR), guidance Magnetic resonance (MR), temperature monitoring Ultrasound (US), therapeutic
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. L. Muldoon, C. Soussain, K. Jahnke, C. Johanson, T. Siegal, Q. R. Smith, W. A. Hall, K. Hynynen, P. D. Senter, D. M. Peereboom, et al. Chemotherapy Delivery Issues in Central Nervous System Malignancy: A Reality Check J. Clin. Oncol., June 1, 2007; 25(16): 2295 - 2305. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Kopelman and M. Papa Magnetic Resonance-Guided Focused Ultrasound Surgery for the Noninvasive Curative Ablation of Tumors and Palliative Treatments: A Review Ann. Surg. Oncol., May 1, 2007; 14(5): 1540 - 1550. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Yang Nano- and Microparticle-based Imaging of Cardiovascular Interventions: Overview Radiology, May 1, 2007; 243(2): 340 - 347. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Forsberg Will the Combination of US Contrast Microbubbles and High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Enable Noninvasive Brain Surgery? Radiology, October 1, 2006; 241(1): 1 - 2. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. J. McDannold, N. I. Vykhodtseva, and K. Hynynen Microbubble Contrast Agent with Focused Ultrasound to Create Brain Lesions at Low Power Levels: MR Imaging and Histologic Study in Rabbits Radiology, October 1, 2006; 241(1): 95 - 106. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Kinoshita, N. McDannold, F. A. Jolesz, and K. Hynynen Noninvasive localized delivery of Herceptin to the mouse brain by MRI-guided focused ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier disruption PNAS, August 1, 2006; 103(31): 11719 - 11723. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. H. Mesiwala, P. D. Mourad, K. Hynynen, N. McDannold, N. Vykhodtseva, and F. A. Jolesz Monitoring of Biologic Effects of Focused Ultrasound Beams on the Brain * Drs Hynynen and colleagues respond: Radiology, July 1, 2002; 224(1): 294 - 297. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
F. Schlachetzki, T. Holscher, H. J. Koch, B. Draganski, A. May, G. Schuierer, and U. Bogdahn Observation on the Integrity of the Blood-Brain Barrier After Microbubble Destruction by Diagnostic Transcranial Color-Coded Sonography J. Ultrasound Med., April 1, 2002; 21(4): 419 - 429. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |