Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2203001628
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kuntz-Hehner, S.
Right arrow Articles by Tiemann, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kuntz-Hehner, S.
Right arrow Articles by Tiemann, K.
(Radiology. 2001;220:647-654.)
© RSNA, 2001


Experimental Studies

Continuous-Infusion Contrast-enhanced US: In Vitro Studies of Infusion Techniques with Different Contrast Agents1

Stefanie Kuntz-Hehner, MD, Jon Goenechea, MD, Christoph Pohl, MD, Thomas Schlosser, MD, Christian Veltmann, Christoph Lentz, MD, Stefan Lohmaier, Alexander Ehlgen, Heyder Omran, MD, Harald Becher, MD and Klaus Tiemann, MD

1 From the Departments of Cardiology (S.K.H., J.G., T.S., C.V., C.L., S.L., A.E., H.O., H.B., K.T.) and Neurology (C.P.), University of Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Strasse 25, 53105 Bonn, Germany. Received October 26, 2000; revision requested November 24; revision received February 23, 2001; accepted April 12. S.K.H. supported by a research grant from the German Society of Cardiology, Düsseldorf, Germany. K.T. and C.P. supported by a research grant from BONFOR, Bonn, Germany. Address correspondence to K.T. (e-mail: k-tiemann@uni-bonn.de).

PURPOSE: To evaluate the infusion properties of three ultrasonographic (US) contrast agents and to compare different infusion techniques for achieving constant signals during harmonic power Doppler US.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: In vitro studies were performed in a flow phantom. SH U 508A, NC100100, or FS069 was continuously infused at clinically usable doses and infusion rates. To assess agent-specific physical properties, these agents were administered by using a vertically fixed infusion pump and varying infusion start times. The contrast agents were administered by also using a horizontally oriented infusion pump that was either fixed or continuously rotated to homogenize the agent in the syringe.

RESULTS: With SH U 508A and NC100100, constant signals were achieved, regardless of the infusion modality used. Compared with conventional infusion, the continuous homogenization of SH U 508A, although not necessary for signal constancy, increased the agent’s usefulness (P < .05). With FS069, only continuous homogenization yielded constant signals (P < .001).

CONCLUSION: Continuous infusion of SH U 508A or NC100100 provided constant harmonic power Doppler US signals, regardless of the infusion modality used. Because of the special physical properties of FS069, only homogenization produced constant harmonic power Doppler US signals during continuous infusion of this agent.

Index terms: Contrast media, comparative studies • Contrast media, experimental studies • Experimental studies • Ultrasound (US), contrast media, **.129842, **.12988




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. Okada, C. W. Hoffmann, K. J. Wolf, and T. Albrecht
Bolus versus Continuous Infusion of Microbubble Contrast Agent for Liver US: Initial Experience
Radiology, December 1, 2005; 237(3): 1063 - 1067.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart J SupplHome page
H. Becher, K. Tiemann, S. Kuntz-Hehner, H. Omran, and T. Schlosser
Diagnostic impact of contrast echocardiography for assessment of left ventricular function and myocardial perfusion in patients with coronary artery disease
Eur. Heart J. Suppl., March 1, 2002; 4(suppl_C): C12 - C21.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2001 by the Radiological Society of North America.