|
|
||||||||
Experimental Studies |
1 From the Departments of Cardiology (S.K.H., J.G., T.S., C.V., C.L., S.L., A.E., H.O., H.B., K.T.) and Neurology (C.P.), University of Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Strasse 25, 53105 Bonn, Germany. Received October 26, 2000; revision requested November 24; revision received February 23, 2001; accepted April 12. S.K.H. supported by a research grant from the German Society of Cardiology, Düsseldorf, Germany. K.T. and C.P. supported by a research grant from BONFOR, Bonn, Germany. Address correspondence to K.T. (e-mail: k-tiemann@uni-bonn.de).
PURPOSE: To evaluate the infusion properties of three ultrasonographic (US) contrast agents and to compare different infusion techniques for achieving constant signals during harmonic power Doppler US.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In vitro studies were performed in a flow phantom. SH U 508A, NC100100, or FS069 was continuously infused at clinically usable doses and infusion rates. To assess agent-specific physical properties, these agents were administered by using a vertically fixed infusion pump and varying infusion start times. The contrast agents were administered by also using a horizontally oriented infusion pump that was either fixed or continuously rotated to homogenize the agent in the syringe.
RESULTS: With SH U 508A and NC100100, constant signals were achieved, regardless of the infusion modality used. Compared with conventional infusion, the continuous homogenization of SH U 508A, although not necessary for signal constancy, increased the agents usefulness (P < .05). With FS069, only continuous homogenization yielded constant signals (P < .001).
CONCLUSION: Continuous infusion of SH U 508A or NC100100 provided constant harmonic power Doppler US signals, regardless of the infusion modality used. Because of the special physical properties of FS069, only homogenization produced constant harmonic power Doppler US signals during continuous infusion of this agent.
Index terms: Contrast media, comparative studies Contrast media, experimental studies Experimental studies Ultrasound (US), contrast media, **.129842, **.12988
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Okada, C. W. Hoffmann, K. J. Wolf, and T. Albrecht Bolus versus Continuous Infusion of Microbubble Contrast Agent for Liver US: Initial Experience Radiology, December 1, 2005; 237(3): 1063 - 1067. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Becher, K. Tiemann, S. Kuntz-Hehner, H. Omran, and T. Schlosser Diagnostic impact of contrast echocardiography for assessment of left ventricular function and myocardial perfusion in patients with coronary artery disease Eur. Heart J. Suppl., March 1, 2002; 4(suppl_C): C12 - C21. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |