|
|
||||||||
Genitourinary Imaging |
1 From the Department of Radiology (E.K., M.A.B.) and the Radiology Fellowship Program (H.M.F., M.B.), Boston University School of Medicine, 88 E Newton St, Boston, MA 02118. Received July 5, 2000; revision requested August 16; final revision received March 29, 2001; accepted March 29. Address correspondence to E.K. (e-mail: ewa.kuligowska@bmc.org).
PURPOSE: To determine the accuracy of detecting prostate cancer by using (a) gray-scale and color Doppler transrectal ultrasonography (US), (b) serum and excess prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, and (c) targeted and sextant transrectal US-guided biopsy. The relationship between USdetected neovascularity and tumor biologic activity was also evaluated.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 1995 and 1999, 544 patients with elevated PSA levels and/or abnormal digital rectal examination underwent transrectal US-guided sextant biopsy and targeted biopsy of US abnormalities. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of gray-scale US, color Doppler US, targeted biopsy, and PSA and excess PSA were calculated.
RESULTS: Gray-scale US depicted 78 (41.1%) of 190 cancers, whereas color Doppler US depicted 30 (15.8%) additional cancers. Targeted biopsy was used to detect 108 (56.8%) cancers, whereas sextant biopsy was used to detect 82 (43.2%) additional cancers. Although US-visible cancers had a higher Gleason grade than did cancers discovered at sextant biopsy (P < .05), 25 of the 66 cancers identified with sextant biopsy alone were Gleason grade 6 or higher. Color Doppler USdepicted hypervascularity correlated with biologically aggressive tumors. Excess PSA was normal in 58 (30.5%) cancers, with an accuracy of 67.3%, resulting in better prediction of prostate tumors than with serum PSA level alone.
CONCLUSION: Gray-scale transrectal US, even coupled with color Doppler US, is inadequate for prostate carcinoma screening; therefore, targeted biopsy should always be accompanied by complete sextant biopsy sampling.
Index terms: Genitourinary system, abnormalities, 844.32 Prostate, biopsy, 844.1261, 844.12985 Prostate, US, 844.12983, 844.12985, 844.12989
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
V. Kundra, P. M. Silverman, S. F. Matin, and H. Choi Imaging in Oncology from The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center: Diagnosis, Staging, and Surveillance of Prostate Cancer Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2007; 189(4): 830 - 844. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Hricak, P. L. Choyke, S. C. Eberhardt, S. A. Leibel, and P. T. Scardino Imaging Prostate Cancer: A Multidisciplinary Perspective Radiology, April 1, 2007; 243(1): 28 - 53. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Yi, J. K. Kim, S. H. Park, K. W. Kim, H. S. Kim, J. H. Kim, H. W. Eun, and K.-S. Cho Contrast-Enhanced Sonography for Prostate Cancer Detection in Patients with Indeterminate Clinical Findings. Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2006; 186(5): 1431 - 1435. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. H. Arger, S. B. Malkowicz, K. N. VanArsdalen, C. M. Sehgal, A. Holzer, and S. M. Schultz Color and Power Doppler Sonography in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: Comparison Between Vascular Density and Total Vascularity J. Ultrasound Med., May 1, 2004; 23(5): 623 - 630. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Frauscher, E. J. Halpern, A. Klauser, E. Kuligowska, M. A. Barish, H. M. Fenlon, and M. A. Blake Accuracy of Gray-Scale and Color Doppler US and Serum Markers as Predictors of Prostate Carcinoma * Drs Kuligowska and colleagues respond: *Radiology statistical consultant responds: Radiology, April 1, 2002; 223(1): 282 - 284. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |