Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2211010380
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gotway, M. B.
Right arrow Articles by Webb, W. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gotway, M. B.
Right arrow Articles by Webb, W. R.
(Radiology. 2001;221:207-212.)
© RSNA, 2001


Thoracic Imaging

Acute Rejection Following Lung Transplantation: Limitations in Accuracy of Thin-Section CT for Diagnosis1

Michael B. Gotway, MD, Samuel K. Dawn, MD, Dorra Sellami, MD, Jeffrey A. Golden, MD, Gautham P. Reddy, MD, MPH, Frasier M. Keith, MD and W. Richard Webb, MD

1 From the Departments of Radiology (M.B.G.), Thoracic Imaging Section (M.B.G., S.K.D., D.S., G.P.R., W.R.W.), Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine (J.A.G.), and Surgery (F.M.K.), San Francisco General Hospital, University of California, San Francisco, 1001 Potrero Ave, Rm 1X 55A, Box 1325, San Francisco, CA 94110. Received January 30, 2001; revision requested March 6; revision received April 3; accepted May 2. Address correspondence to M.B.G. (e-mail: michael.gotway@radiology.ucsf.edu).

PURPOSE: To evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and accuracy of thin-section computed tomography (CT) for the diagnosis of acute rejection following lung transplantation and to determine whether any individual CT abnormalities are associated with histopathologically proved acute rejection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thin-section CT studies from 64 lung transplant recipients were retrospectively reviewed. CT studies were temporally correlated with various grades of biopsy-proved acute rejection (n = 34); 30 other CT studies were from a control group with no histopathologic evidence of acute rejection. Acute rejection was diagnosed as present or absent, and the diagnostic was calculated.

RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of CT for the diagnosis of acute rejection were as follows: 35%, 73%, 60%, 50%, 53%, respectively. No individual CT finding was significantly associated with acute rejection. The sensitivity of CT for the detection of various grades of acute rejection was 17% for grade A1, 50% for grade A2, and 20% for grade A3. The combination of volume loss and septal thickening, with or without pleural effusion, was never seen in the absence of acute rejection.

CONCLUSION: Thin-section CT has limited accuracy for the diagnosis of acute rejection following lung transplantation, and no individual CT finding is significantly associated with this diagnosis.

Index terms: Computed tomography (CT), thin-section, 60.12118 • Lung, transplantation




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
M. S. Krishnam, R. D. Suh, A. Tomasian, J. G. Goldin, C. Lai, K. Brown, P. Batra, and D. R. Aberle
Postoperative Complications of Lung Transplantation: Radiologic Findings along a Time Continuum
RadioGraphics, July 1, 2007; 27(4): 957 - 974.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
E. M. Marom, S. M. Palmer, J. J. Erasmus, J. E. Herndon, C. Zhang, and H. P. McAdams
Pleural Effusions in Lung Transplant Recipients: Image-guided Small-Bore Catheter Drainage
Radiology, July 1, 2003; 228(1): 241 - 245.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2001 by the Radiological Society of North America.