|
|
||||||||
Viewpoint |
1 From the Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3808, Durham, NC 27710 (E.F.P., P.C.G.); and the Department of Radiology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH (W.C.B.). Received October 12, 2000; revision requested October 24; revision received November 21; accepted December 9. Address correspondence to E.F.P. (e-mail: patz0002@mc.duke.edu).
Lung cancer continues to be a major worldwide health problem. Multiple strategies are being explored in an attempt to reduce lung cancer mortality, including a renewed interest in screening. Multiple low-dose spiral computed tomography (CT) trials have been proposed, as proponents predict that small nodules will represent early-stage disease and detecting them will ultimately translate into improvements in outcomes. At this time, however, only prevalence-screening data are available, and it remains to be seen if CT will truly reduce mortality. The appropriate hypothesis-driven studies still must be performed and the results carefully analyzed before CT screening for lung cancer can be accepted as the standard of care.
Index terms: Computed tomography (CT), utilization Lung neoplasms, CT, 60.12111, 60.12115 Lung neoplasms, diagnosis, 60.32 Lung neoplasms, screening Lung neoplasms, staging
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W. C. Black, D. R. Aberle, C. D. Berg, and For the Executive Committee of the National Lung S Large Field Trial for Lung Cancer Screening: Putting the Wrong Cart before the Horse? Radiology, May 1, 2007; 243(2): 314 - 316. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. T. Kolber, G. Zipp, D. Glendinning, and J. J. Mitchell Patient Expectations of Full-Body CT Screening Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2007; 188(3): W297 - W304. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. S. Gazelle, P. M. McMahon, U. Siebert, and M. T. Beinfeld Cost-effectiveness Analysis in the Assessment of Diagnostic Imaging Technologies Radiology, May 1, 2005; 235(2): 361 - 370. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. W. Grannis Overestimation of Lung Cancer Mortality in a Computed Tomography-Screened Population J. Clin. Oncol., April 1, 2005; 23(10): 2439 - 2440. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Brenner Radiation Risks Potentially Associated with Low-Dose CT Screening of Adult Smokers for Lung Cancer Radiology, May 1, 2004; 231(2): 440 - 445. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Awai, K. Murao, A. Ozawa, M. Komi, H. Hayakawa, S. Hori, and Y. Nishimura Pulmonary Nodules at Chest CT: Effect of Computer-aided Diagnosis on Radiologists' Detection Performance Radiology, February 1, 2004; 230(2): 347 - 352. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Ni, S. Dymarkowski, F. Chen, J. Bogaert, G. Marchal, T.-H. Lim, and S. S. Lee Proper Handling of Research with Invalid Conclusions [letter] * Drs Lim and Lee respond: Radiology, November 1, 2003; 229(2): 608 - 610. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. R. Grann and A. I. Neugut Lung Cancer Screening at Any Price? JAMA, January 15, 2003; 289(3): 357 - 358. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. K. Shah, J. H. M. Austin, C. S. White, P. Patel, L. B. Haramati, G. D. N. Pearson, M. C. Shiau, and Y. M. Berkmen Missed Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Radiographic Findings of Potentially Resectable Lesions Evident Only in Retrospect Radiology, January 1, 2003; 226(1): 235 - 241. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. G. Armato III, F. Li, M. L. Giger, H. MacMahon, S. Sone, and K. Doi Lung Cancer: Performance of Automated Lung Nodule Detection Applied to Cancers Missed in a CT Screening Program Radiology, December 1, 2002; 225(3): 685 - 692. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Li, S. Sone, H. Abe, H. MacMahon, S. G. Armato III, and K. Doi Lung Cancers Missed at Low-Dose Helical CT Screening in a General Population: Comparison of Clinical, Histopathologic, and Imaging Findings Radiology, December 1, 2002; 225(3): 673 - 683. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Ni, S. Dymarkowski, F. Chen, J. Bogaert, G. Marchal, S. H. Choi, S. S. Lee, S. I. Choi, S. T. Kim, K. H. Lim, et al. Occlusive Myocardial Infarction Enhanced or Not Enhanced with Necrosis-avid Contrast Agents at MR Imaging * Dr Choi and colleagues respond: Radiology, November 1, 2002; 225(2): 603 - 606. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. J. Casarella A Patient's Viewpoint on a Current Controversy Radiology, September 1, 2002; 224(3): 927 - 927. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. M. Hall, E. F. Patz Jr, W. C. Black, and P. C. Goodman Screening for Lung Cancer: Been There and Done That * Dr Patz and colleagues respond: Radiology, September 1, 2002; 224(3): 928 - 929. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Anorbe, P. Aisa, E. F. Patz, W. C. Black, and P. C. Goodman Mortality Rate and Screening * Dr Patz and colleagues respond: Radiology, September 1, 2002; 224(3): 929 - 930. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Heffner and G. Silvestri CT Screening for Lung Cancer . Is Smaller Better? Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., February 15, 2002; 165(4): 433 - 434. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. S. Miettinen and C. I. Henschke Commentary on Drs Patz, Black, and Goodman's Viewpoint Radiology, December 1, 2001; 221(3): 598 - 599. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |