Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print October 22, 2001, 10.1148/radiol.2213010183
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2213010183v1
221/3/668    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Molloi, S.
Right arrow Articles by Wang, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Molloi, S.
Right arrow Articles by Wang, F.
(Radiology. 2001;221:668-675.)
© RSNA, 2001


Experimental Studies

X-ray Beam Equalization: Feasibility and Performance of an Automated Prototype System in a Phantom and Swine1

Sabee Molloi, PhD, Alan Van Drie, PhD and Fuming Wang, PhD

1 From the Department of Radiological Sciences, Medical Sciences I, B-140, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697. Received December 27, 2000; revision requested January 26, 2001; revision received June 21; accepted July 5. Supported in part by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; National Institutes of Health; Department of Health and Human Services grant R01 HL57338. Address correspondence to S.M. (e-mail: symolloi@uci.edu).

PURPOSE: To investigate the feasibility of an automated implementation of a beam equalization technique and to evaluate the experimental performance of the prototype system.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: X-ray beam equalization involved the process of low-dose image acquisition, attenuator thickness calculation, mask generation, mask positioning, equalized image acquisition, and mask reshaping. The entire equalization process was performed in approximately 7 seconds. The equalized images were assessed both qualitatively and quantitatively by using a humanoid phantom and a swine animal model. The general image quality was assessed for the ability to visualize arterial branches and other anatomic structures. The level of equalization was quantitatively assessed by segmenting the images into an 8 x 8 matrix of square regions.

RESULTS: The ratio of the root-mean-squared variance for the equalized and unequalized images from humanoid phantom and swine animal studies was 0.49 and 0.59, respectively. Furthermore, qualitative assessment of the images showed substantial improvement in image quality and visualization of arterial branches after beam equalization in phantom and animal studies.

CONCLUSION: Automated area beam equalization is feasible and improves image quality in previously underpenetrated regions of the image.

Index terms: Computers, examination control, 60.1215 • Filters, radiographic, 60.1215 • Thorax, radiography, 60.1215







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2001 by the Radiological Society of North America.