|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pediatric Imaging |
1 From the Department of Radiology, Childrens Mercy Hospital and University of Missouri, 2401 Gillham Rd, Kansas City, MO 64108 (L.H.L.); and Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences (K.S.D., M.H.S., R.M.H., S.M.S.), Center for Clinical Improvement (M.R.N., T.S.), and Department of Medicine (T.S.), Division of General Medicine Health Services Research, Vanderbilt Childrens Hospital and Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn. Received January 30, 2001; revision requested March 6; revision received April 23; accepted May 2. Address correspondence to L.H.L. (e-mail: llowe@cmh.edu).
PURPOSE: To prospectively compare resident and attending radiologic interpretations of nonenhanced limited computed tomographic (CT) scans obtained in children suspected of having appendicitis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-five consecutive children underwent nonenhanced limited CT for suspected appendicitis. The scans were prospectively interpreted by a resident and an attending radiologist, each unaware of the others interpretation. The probability that the findings indicated a diagnosis of appendicitis, level of certainty in the interpretation, and presence of an alternate diagnosis were statistically analyzed.
RESULTS: Nineteen children (25%) had appendicitis. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was not significantly different between residents (0.97 ± 0.02) and attendings (0.95 ± 0.04). The percentage agreement between residents and attendings was 91% (
= 0.73 ± 0.095). The average level of certainty tended to be higher for attendings (93% ± 15) than residents (89% ± 12). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of resident interpretations were 63%, 96%, and 88%, respectively, compared with those of attending interpretations95%, 98%, and 97%, respectively. Residents and attendings noted alternate diagnoses in 30% of children without appendicitis.
CONCLUSION: A high level of agreement exists between resident and attending radiologists in the interpretation of nonenhanced limited CT scans in children suspected of having appendicitis. Residents, however, tend to be less confident in their interpretations.
Index terms: Appendicitis, 751.291 Children, gastrointestinal tract, 751.291 Computed tomography (CT), in infants and children, 751.12111
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Carney, J. Kempf, V. DeCarvalho, A. Yudd, and J. Nosher Preliminary Interpretations of After-Hours CT and Sonography by Radiology Residents Versus Final Interpretations by Body Imaging Radiologists at a Level 1 Trauma Center Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2003; 181(2): 367 - 373. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Raptopoulos, G. Katsou, M. P. Rosen, B. Siewert, S. N. Goldberg, and J. B. Kruskal Acute Appendicitis: Effect of Increased Use of CT on Selecting Patients Earlier Radiology, February 1, 2003; 226(2): 521 - 526. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P J Shorvon Imaging of appendicitis: a cautionary note Br. J. Radiol., September 1, 2002; 75(897): 717 - 720. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |