Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print October 30, 2001, 10.1148/radiol.2212010280
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2212010280v1
221/3/763    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gönen, M.
Right arrow Articles by Larson, S. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gönen, M.
Right arrow Articles by Larson, S. M.
(Radiology. 2001;221:763-767.)
© RSNA, 2001


Special Report

Statistical Issues in Analysis of Diagnostic Imaging Experiments with Multiple Observations per Patient1

Mithat Gönen, PhD, Katherine S. Panageas, DrPH and Steven M. Larson, MD

1 From the Departments of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (M.G., K.S.P.) and Radiology (S.M.L.), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 44, New York, NY 10021. Received January 8, 2001; revision requested February 12; revision received April 23; accepted May 14. Supported by grant 1 P50 CA86438 01 from the National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute and by the Hascoe Fund. Address correspondence to M.G. (e-mail: gonenm@mskcc.org).

Many diagnostic imaging experiments are characterized by the presence of several observations for each patient studied. Evaluation of metastases with different imaging modalities in patients with cancer or examination of multiple artery segments in patients with heart abnormalities are some examples of such studies. Data obtained from multiple observations per patient are cluster correlated and should not be analyzed by using standard statistical methods because of correlations within a subject. In this article, positron emission tomographic studies are used as a framework to review statistical methods for the analysis of clustered data. Some simple statistical methods that account for correlation within a subject and that can be applied to conventional and well-known statistical methods, such as the {chi}2 and t tests, are introduced. One of these methods is illustrated by using a brief analysis of data from a positron emission tomographic study, which demonstrates how resulting conclusions may be incorrect if appropriate techniques are not applied. Alternative methods that can handle multiple observations and dependency within a subject for diagnostic imaging studies are discussed.

Index terms: Positron emission tomography (PET) • Special Reports • Statistical analysis




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
D. Oncel, G. Oncel, A. Tastan, and B. Tamci
Evaluation of Coronary Stent Patency and In-Stent Restenosis with Dual-Source CT Coronary Angiography Without Heart Rate Control
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2008; 191(1): 56 - 63.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
N. Pandit-Taskar, J. A. O'Donoghue, M. J. Morris, E. A. Wills, L. H. Schwartz, M. Gonen, H. I. Scher, S. M. Larson, and C. R. Divgi
Antibody Mass Escalation Study in Patients with Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Using 111In-J591: Lesion Detectability and Dosimetric Projections for 90Y Radioimmunotherapy
J. Nucl. Med., July 1, 2008; 49(7): 1066 - 1074.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. Oda, K. Awai, D. Liu, T. Nakaura, Y. Yanaga, H. Nomori, and Y. Yamashita
Ground-Glass Opacities on Thin-Section Helical CT: Differentiation Between Bronchioloalveolar Carcinoma and Atypical Adenomatous Hyperplasia
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2008; 190(5): 1363 - 1368.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. Oncel, G. Oncel, and A. Tastan
Effectiveness of Dual-Source CT Coronary Angiography for the Evaluation of Coronary Artery Disease in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: Initial Experience
Radiology, December 1, 2007; 245(3): 703 - 711.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
H. U. Gerth, K. U. Juergens, U. Dirksen, J. Gerss, O. Schober, and C. Franzius
Significant Benefit of Multimodal Imaging: PET/CT Compared with PET Alone in Staging and Follow-up of Patients with Ewing Tumors
J. Nucl. Med., December 1, 2007; 48(12): 1932 - 1939.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. B. Park, J. K. Kim, H. J. Lee, H. J. Choi, and K.-S. Cho
Hematuria: Portal Venous Phase Multi Detector Row CT of the Bladder A Prospective Study
Radiology, December 1, 2007; 245(3): 798 - 805.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
S. C. Ong, H. Schoder, S. G. Patel, I. M. Tabangay-Lim, I. Doddamane, M. Gonen, A. R. Shaha, R. M. Tuttle, J. P. Shah, and S. M. Larson
Diagnostic Accuracy of 18F-FDG PET in Restaging Patients with Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma and Elevated Calcitonin Levels
J. Nucl. Med., April 1, 2007; 48(4): 501 - 507.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
G. T. Sica
Bias in Research Studies
Radiology, March 1, 2006; 238(3): 780 - 789.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. C. Zajick Jr, W. B. Morrison, M. E. Schweitzer, J. A. Parellada, and J. A. Carrino
Benign and Malignant Processes: Normal Values and Differentiation with Chemical Shift MR Imaging in Vertebral Marrow
Radiology, November 1, 2005; 237(2): 590 - 596.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
M. H. K. Hoffmann, H. Shi, B. L. Schmitz, F. T. Schmid, M. Lieberknecht, R. Schulze, B. Ludwig, U. Kroschel, N. Jahnke, W. Haerer, et al.
Noninvasive Coronary Angiography With Multislice Computed Tomography
JAMA, May 25, 2005; 293(20): 2471 - 2478.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. Hong, G. S. Chrysant, P. K. Woodard, and K. T. Bae
Coronary Artery Stent Patency Assessed with In-Stent Contrast Enhancement Measured at Multi-Detector Row CT Angiography: Initial Experience
Radiology, October 1, 2004; 233(1): 286 - 291.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. K. Kim, S.-Y. Park, H. J. Ahn, C. S. Kim, and K.-S. Cho
Bladder Cancer: Analysis of Multi-Detector Row Helical CT Enhancement Pattern and Accuracy in Tumor Detection and Perivesical Staging
Radiology, June 1, 2004; 231(3): 725 - 731.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
H. Schoder, H. W. D. Yeung, M. Gonen, D. Kraus, and S. M. Larson
Head and Neck Cancer: Clinical Usefulness and Accuracy of PET/CT Image Fusion
Radiology, April 1, 2004; 231(1): 65 - 72.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. Van Hoe and M. Vanderheyden
Ischemic Cardiomyopathy: Value of Different MRI Techniques for Prediction of Functional Recovery After Revascularization
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2004; 182(1): 95 - 100.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. Tello and P. E. Crewson
Hypothesis Testing II: Means
Radiology, April 1, 2003; 227(1): 1 - 4.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2001 by the Radiological Society of North America.