|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Special Report |
1 From the Departments of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (M.G., K.S.P.) and Radiology (S.M.L.), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 44, New York, NY 10021. Received January 8, 2001; revision requested February 12; revision received April 23; accepted May 14. Supported by grant 1 P50 CA86438 01 from the National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute and by the Hascoe Fund. Address correspondence to M.G. (e-mail: gonenm@mskcc.org).
Many diagnostic imaging experiments are characterized by the presence of several observations for each patient studied. Evaluation of metastases with different imaging modalities in patients with cancer or examination of multiple artery segments in patients with heart abnormalities are some examples of such studies. Data obtained from multiple observations per patient are cluster correlated and should not be analyzed by using standard statistical methods because of correlations within a subject. In this article, positron emission tomographic studies are used as a framework to review statistical methods for the analysis of clustered data. Some simple statistical methods that account for correlation within a subject and that can be applied to conventional and well-known statistical methods, such as the
2 and t tests, are introduced. One of these methods is illustrated by using a brief analysis of data from a positron emission tomographic study, which demonstrates how resulting conclusions may be incorrect if appropriate techniques are not applied. Alternative methods that can handle multiple observations and dependency within a subject for diagnostic imaging studies are discussed.
Index terms: Positron emission tomography (PET) Special Reports Statistical analysis
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. Oncel, G. Oncel, A. Tastan, and B. Tamci Evaluation of Coronary Stent Patency and In-Stent Restenosis with Dual-Source CT Coronary Angiography Without Heart Rate Control Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2008; 191(1): 56 - 63. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Pandit-Taskar, J. A. O'Donoghue, M. J. Morris, E. A. Wills, L. H. Schwartz, M. Gonen, H. I. Scher, S. M. Larson, and C. R. Divgi Antibody Mass Escalation Study in Patients with Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Using 111In-J591: Lesion Detectability and Dosimetric Projections for 90Y Radioimmunotherapy J. Nucl. Med., July 1, 2008; 49(7): 1066 - 1074. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Oda, K. Awai, D. Liu, T. Nakaura, Y. Yanaga, H. Nomori, and Y. Yamashita Ground-Glass Opacities on Thin-Section Helical CT: Differentiation Between Bronchioloalveolar Carcinoma and Atypical Adenomatous Hyperplasia Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2008; 190(5): 1363 - 1368. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Oncel, G. Oncel, and A. Tastan Effectiveness of Dual-Source CT Coronary Angiography for the Evaluation of Coronary Artery Disease in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: Initial Experience Radiology, December 1, 2007; 245(3): 703 - 711. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. U. Gerth, K. U. Juergens, U. Dirksen, J. Gerss, O. Schober, and C. Franzius Significant Benefit of Multimodal Imaging: PET/CT Compared with PET Alone in Staging and Follow-up of Patients with Ewing Tumors J. Nucl. Med., December 1, 2007; 48(12): 1932 - 1939. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. B. Park, J. K. Kim, H. J. Lee, H. J. Choi, and K.-S. Cho Hematuria: Portal Venous Phase Multi Detector Row CT of the Bladder A Prospective Study Radiology, December 1, 2007; 245(3): 798 - 805. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. C. Ong, H. Schoder, S. G. Patel, I. M. Tabangay-Lim, I. Doddamane, M. Gonen, A. R. Shaha, R. M. Tuttle, J. P. Shah, and S. M. Larson Diagnostic Accuracy of 18F-FDG PET in Restaging Patients with Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma and Elevated Calcitonin Levels J. Nucl. Med., April 1, 2007; 48(4): 501 - 507. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. T. Sica Bias in Research Studies Radiology, March 1, 2006; 238(3): 780 - 789. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. C. Zajick Jr, W. B. Morrison, M. E. Schweitzer, J. A. Parellada, and J. A. Carrino Benign and Malignant Processes: Normal Values and Differentiation with Chemical Shift MR Imaging in Vertebral Marrow Radiology, November 1, 2005; 237(2): 590 - 596. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. H. K. Hoffmann, H. Shi, B. L. Schmitz, F. T. Schmid, M. Lieberknecht, R. Schulze, B. Ludwig, U. Kroschel, N. Jahnke, W. Haerer, et al. Noninvasive Coronary Angiography With Multislice Computed Tomography JAMA, May 25, 2005; 293(20): 2471 - 2478. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Hong, G. S. Chrysant, P. K. Woodard, and K. T. Bae Coronary Artery Stent Patency Assessed with In-Stent Contrast Enhancement Measured at Multi-Detector Row CT Angiography: Initial Experience Radiology, October 1, 2004; 233(1): 286 - 291. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. K. Kim, S.-Y. Park, H. J. Ahn, C. S. Kim, and K.-S. Cho Bladder Cancer: Analysis of Multi-Detector Row Helical CT Enhancement Pattern and Accuracy in Tumor Detection and Perivesical Staging Radiology, June 1, 2004; 231(3): 725 - 731. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Schoder, H. W. D. Yeung, M. Gonen, D. Kraus, and S. M. Larson Head and Neck Cancer: Clinical Usefulness and Accuracy of PET/CT Image Fusion Radiology, April 1, 2004; 231(1): 65 - 72. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Van Hoe and M. Vanderheyden Ischemic Cardiomyopathy: Value of Different MRI Techniques for Prediction of Functional Recovery After Revascularization Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2004; 182(1): 95 - 100. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Tello and P. E. Crewson Hypothesis Testing II: Means Radiology, April 1, 2003; 227(1): 1 - 4. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |