|
|
||||||||
Ultrasonography |
1 From the Department of Radiology, University of California Davis (M.C.D.); the Department of Radiology, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, 1516 Jefferson Hwy, New Orleans, LA 70121 (W.E.T., E.I.B., M.Y.); the Department of Nephrology, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, La (J.S.L.); and the Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pa (C.R.B.M.). From the 1998 RSNA scientific assembly. Received June 7, 1999; revision requested August 3; final revision received August 13, 2001; accepted August 15.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the role and usefulness of diagnostic ultrasonography (US) in the assessment of hemodialysis access grafts with an intermediate probability of graft malfunction.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred forty-seven complete US examinations were performed in 91 patients. Average volume of flow, peak systolic velocity, and diameter of residual lumen were recorded. Patients were referred by the nephrology department when clinical findings were suggestive, but not obviously, of graft malfunction. Study results were deemed normal if flow volume exceeded 1,300 mL/min without significant visualized stenosis of 50% of the diameter or greater or if flow approached 1,300 mL/min without peak systolic velocity greater than 400 cm/sec.
RESULTS: Of the 147 examinations, 49 (33%) had normal results, seven (5%) showed thrombosis at examination, and 91 (62%) had evidence of at least one significant visualized stenosis or diffuse notable degree of thrombus. Three patients with normal results required fistulography within 90 days, one for thrombosis. In the 91 studies with abnormal results, 69 patients underwent fistulography; results in 63 showed agreement, and three showed false-positive results. More central venous stenoses were found at fistulography than at US.
CONCLUSION: US is a useful and reliable first step in managing clinically suspected hemodialysis graft stenosis. One-third of the studies showed no significant stenosis and did not require angiographic evaluation. US should be the initial study in patients suspected of having hemodialysis access dysfunction without exceptional evidence of stenosis.
Index terms: Dialysis, shunts, 91.442, 91.457, 91.4522 Ultrasound (US), Doppler studies, 91.12983
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Schuman, A. Ronfeld, C. Barclay, and P. Heinl Comparison of Clinical Assessment With Ultrasound Flow for Hemodialysis Access Surveillance Arch Surg, December 1, 2007; 142(12): 1129 - 1133. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. D. Megremis, M. A. Christaki, N. K. Mourkoyiannis, G. S. Papadopoulos, and A. M. Tsilimigaki Iatrogenic Brachial Arteriovenous Fistula in a Child: Color Doppler Ultrasonographic Evaluation J. Ultrasound Med., June 1, 2006; 25(6): 809 - 812. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. L. Froger, L. E. M. Duijm, Y. S. Liem, A. V. Tielbeek, A. B. Donkers-van Rossum, P. Douwes-Draaijer, P. W. M. Cuypers, J. Buth, and H. C. M. van den Bosch Stenosis Detection with MR Angiography and Digital Subtraction Angiography in Dysfunctional Hemodialysis Access Fistulas and Grafts Radiology, January 1, 2005; 234(1): 284 - 291. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Wiese and B. Nonnast-Daniel Colour Doppler ultrasound in dialysis access Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., August 1, 2004; 19(8): 1956 - 1963. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |