|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Health Policy and Practice |
1 From the Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, 111 S 11th St, Philadelphia, PA 19107 (D.C.L., L.P., C.I.); and the American College of Radiology, Reston, Va (J.H.S.). From the 2000 RSNA scientific assembly. Received February 12, 2001; revision requested March 5; revision received April 30; accepted June 20. Address correspondence to D.C.L. (e-mail: david.levin@mail.tju.edu).
PURPOSE: To evaluate cardiac nuclear medicine practice patterns in different physician specialty groups to better understand a recent rapid increase in utilization of radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) and certain supplementary examinations.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: National Medicare Part B databases from 1996 and 1998 were used to evaluate utilization of four primary procedure codes for radionuclide MPI and two supplementary codes (add-on left ventricular wall motion or left ventricular ejection fraction). Utilization rates were calculated for cardiologists, radiologists, and other physicians. Other cardiac imaging for which radionuclide imaging might be substituted was similarly studied.
RESULTS: Overall utilization rate of radionuclide MPI per 100,000 Medicare beneficiaries increased 19.1%, from 4,046 in 1996 to 4,820 in 1998 (P < .001). However, for cardiologists the rate increased from 1,771 to 2,413 (36.3%), whereas for radiologists it increased from 1,958 to 2,031 (3.7%) (P < .001 for both changes). Overall utilization rate of add-on codes increased 264% from 1,006 to 3,657 (P < .001). By 1998, the ratio of these add-on examinations to primary MPI was 0.94 among cardiologists compared with 0.53 among radiologists (relative risk, 1.77; 95% CI: 1.76, 1.78). Cardiologist-performed stress echocardiography and cardiac catheterization and coronary angiography increased by 24.2% and 8.7%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Growth in utilization of radionuclide MPI between 1996 and 1998 was almost 10 times higher among cardiologists than radiologists. Utilization of the two add-on codes increased even more dramatically. The greater use of MPI is not a substitute for other cardiac imaging.
Index terms: Economics, medical Myocardium, ischemia, 511.1939 Myocardium, radionuclide studies, 511.12171 Radiology and radiologists, socioeconomic issues
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. J. Shaw and J. Narula Cardiovascular Imaging Quality--More Than a Pretty Picture! J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., March 1, 2008; 1(2): 266 - 269. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. P. Krestin, J. C. Miller, S. J. Golding, G. G. Frija, G. M. Glazer, H. G. Ringertz, and J. H. Thrall Reinventing Radiology in a Digital and Molecular Age: Summary of Proceedings of the Sixth Biannual Symposium of the International Society for Strategic Studies in Radiology (IS3R), August 25 27, 2005 Radiology, September 1, 2007; 244(3): 633 - 638. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. J. Shaw, D. Polk, and C. N. Bairey Merz Assessing Mature Technology: What Is the Effect of High-Quality Risk Stratification Evidence With Exercise Echocardiography and Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography Imaging? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 16, 2007; 49(2): 238 - 239. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. J. Shaw, T. H. Marwick, D. S. Berman, S. Sawada, G. V. Heller, C. Vasey, and D. D. Miller Incremental cost-effectiveness of exercise echocardiography vs. SPECT imaging for the evaluation of stable chest pain Eur. Heart J., October 2, 2006; 27(20): 2448 - 2458. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Alter, T. A. Stukel, and A. Newman Proliferation of Cardiac Technology in Canada: A Challenge to the Sustainability of Medicare Circulation, January 24, 2006; 113(3): 380 - 387. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Matin, D. W. Bates, A. Sussman, P. Ros, R. Hanson, and R. Khorasani Inpatient Radiology Utilization: Trends over the Past Decade Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2006; 186(1): 7 - 11. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. W. Litt, D. R. Ryan, D. Batista, K. N. Perry, R. S. Lewis, and J. H. Sunshine Relative Procedure Intensity with Self-Referral and Radiologist Referral: Extremity Radiography Radiology, April 1, 2005; 235(1): 142 - 147. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Bhargavan and J. H. Sunshine Utilization of Radiology Services in the United States: Levels and Trends in Modalities, Regions, and Populations Radiology, March 1, 2005; 234(3): 824 - 832. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. S. Thomas, M. I. Miyamoto, A. P. Morello III, H. Majmundar, J. J. Thomas, C. H. Sampson, R. Hachamovitch, and L. J. Shaw Technetium99m sestamibi myocardial perfusion imaging predicts clinical outcome in the community outpatient setting: The Nuclear Utility in the Community (NUC) Study J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 21, 2004; 43(2): 213 - 223. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. B. Mark, L. J. Shaw, M. S. Lauer, P. G. O'Malley, and P. Heidenreich Task force #5--is atherosclerosis imaging cost effective? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 4, 2003; 41(11): 1906 - 1917. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |