Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print November 19, 2001, 10.1148/radiol.2221010552
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2221010552v1
222/1/189    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ledermann, H. P.
Right arrow Articles by Morrison, W. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ledermann, H. P.
Right arrow Articles by Morrison, W. B.
(Radiology 2002;222:189-195.)
© RSNA, 2001


Musculoskeletal Imaging

Pelvic Heterotopic Ossification: MR Imaging Characteristics1

Hans Peter Ledermann, MD, Mark E. Schweitzer, MD and William B. Morrison, MD

1 From the Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pa (H.P.L., M.E.S., W.B.M.); and Department of Radiology, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031 Basel, Switzerland (H.P.L.). Received March 5, 2001; revision requested April 2; revision received May 10; accepted June 5. Address correspondence to H.P.L. (e-mail: hans-peter.ledermann@gmx.ch).

PURPOSE: To evaluate the magnetic resonance (MR) signal intensity characteristics of pelvic heterotopic ossification (HO) in various stages of maturation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-six patients with HO proved at computed tomography (CT) (n = 17) or radiography (n = 19) who underwent 1.5-T pelvic MR imaging within 3 months were included. HO was defined at CT or radiography as grade 1, fluid attenuation without calcification at CT; grade 2, calcification; grade 3, immature ossification; or grade 4, mature ossification. The location and MR signal intensity of all HO sites were noted.

RESULTS: HO was determined to be grade 1 at 20 of 141 sites, grade 2 at 39, grade 3 at 30, and grade 4 at 52. With increasing HO grade, the following findings were observed: (a) decreasing T2 signal intensity (grade 1, 70%; grade 2, 58%; grade 3, 44%; grade 4, 4%), (b) increasing fat and cortical bone signal intensity at T1-weighted imaging (grade 1, 0%; grade 2, 3%; grade 3, 13%; grade 4, 86%), and (c) decreasing contrast enhancement (from 100% for grade 1 to 20% for grade 4). Fifteen (88%) patients with CT correlation had HO in the anatomic area of the trochanteric or iliopsoas bursa (55 [60%] of 91 sites).

CONCLUSION: With progressive maturity of HO, T2 signal intensity and contrast enhancement decrease, but fat and cortical bone–equivalent signal intensity increases.

Index terms: Bones, abnormalities, 44.1485, 44.82 • Bones, CT, 44.12111, 44.12112, 44.12115 • Bones, MR, 44.121411, 44.121412, 44.121413, 44.121415, 44.121416 • Bones, radiography, 44.11 • Paralysis, 44.82




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
A. Laborde, M. Hermier, and F. Cotton
Sciatic nerve entrapment secondary to heterotopic ossification: imaging findings and potential effect of selective cox-2 inhibitors
Rheumatology, January 1, 2005; 44(1): 110 - 110.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
H. G. Potter, B. J. Nestor, C. M. Sofka, S. T. Ho, L. E. Peters, and E. A. Salvati
Magnetic Resonance Imaging After Total Hip Arthroplasty: Evaluation of Periprosthetic Soft Tissue
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., September 1, 2004; 86(9): 1947 - 1954.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2002 by the Radiological Society of North America.