Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print November 12, 2001, 10.1148/radiol.2221010268
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2221010268v1
222/1/37    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lugmayr, H. F.
Right arrow Articles by Auterith, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lugmayr, H. F.
Right arrow Articles by Auterith, A.
(Radiology 2002;222:37-43.)
© RSNA, 2001


Vascular and Interventional Radiology

Treatment of Complex Arteriosclerotic Lesions with Nitinol Stents in the Superficial Femoral and Popliteal Arteries: A Midterm Follow-up1

Herbert F. Lugmayr, MD, Hermann Holzer, MD, Manfred Kastner, MD, Harald Riedelsberger, MD and Alexandra Auterith, MSc

1 From the Department of Radiology, General Hospital, Grieskirchnerstrasse 42, A-4600 Wels, Austria (H.F.L., M.K.); Department of Radiology, St Franziskus Hospital, Grieskirchen, Austria (H.H., H.R.); and Department of Medical Statistics, University of Vienna, Austria (A.A.). Received January 10, 2001; revision requested March 2; revision received June 18; accepted July 16. Address correspondence to H.F.L. (e-mail: lugmayr.hf@aon.at).

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of nitinol stents in patients with short, complex lesions in the superficial femoral and popliteal arteries and to assess midterm results.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Self-expandable nitinol stents were implanted in 54 extremities in 44 patients to treat complex stenoses (n = 32) and occlusions (n = 22) in the superficial femoral and popliteal arteries. Follow-up was performed for 5–51 months to evaluate early thrombosis and midterm patency rates. Midterm patency rates were compared between the following: stenoses and occlusions, proximal and distal locations, good and poor runoff, and diabetic patients and nondiabetic patients. All patients underwent clinical investigation and color Doppler sonography after 1 month and 6 months and at 6-month intervals thereafter. If restenosis or stent thrombosis was suspected, intraarterial digital subtraction angiography of the superficial and popliteal arteries was performed.

RESULTS: Percutaneous stent implantation was successful in all patients. The mean duration of follow-up was 27 months (range, 5–51 months). No thrombotic occlusion occurred within the first 4 weeks after stent implantation. The primary 3-year patency rate was 76%, and the secondary patency rate was 87%. Three-year primary patency rates were 65% for diabetic patients and 82% for nondiabetic patients.

CONCLUSION: In patients with short, complex stenoses and occlusions, implantation of nitinol stents may have a positive impact on midterm results.

Index terms: Arteries, extremities, 922.1268, 924.1268 • Arteries, stenosis or obstruction, 922.721, 922.7214, 924.721, 924.7214 • Stents and prostheses, 922.1268, 924.1268




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PERSPECT VASC SURG ENDOVASC THERHome page
E. H. Murphy and F. R. Arko
Karthik S, et al. Cryoplasty for Arterial Restenosis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2007;33:40-43
Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, March 1, 2008; 20(1): 98 - 100.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. H. Rogers and J. R. Laird
Overview of New Technologies for Lower Extremity Revascularization
Circulation, October 30, 2007; 116(18): 2072 - 2085.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. Schillinger, S. Sabeti, P. Dick, J. Amighi, W. Mlekusch, O. Schlager, C. Loewe, M. Cejna, J. Lammer, and E. Minar
Sustained Benefit at 2 Years of Primary Femoropopliteal Stenting Compared With Balloon Angioplasty With Optional Stenting
Circulation, May 29, 2007; 115(21): 2745 - 2749.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PERSPECT VASC SURG ENDOVASC THERHome page
C. Klonaris, A. Katsargyris, A. Giannopoulos, and E. Bastounis
Advances in Endovascular Treatment of Femoropopliteal Arterial Occlusive Disease
Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, December 1, 2006; 18(4): 329 - 341.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
M. Schillinger, S. Sabeti, C. Loewe, P. Dick, J. Amighi, W. Mlekusch, O. Schlager, M. Cejna, J. Lammer, and E. Minar
Balloon angioplasty versus implantation of nitinol stents in the superficial femoral artery.
N. Engl. J. Med., May 4, 2006; 354(18): 1879 - 1888.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURGHome page
S. Sultan, L. Heskin, N. Hynes, Y. Akhtar, V. Cough, B. Manning, M. Aremu, and D. Courtney
Salvage of Critical Limb Ischemia with the "Trellis Reserve" of Subintimal Superficial Femoral-Popliteal Artery Occlusion: A New Modality in Managing Critical Limb Ischemia: A Case Report
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, November 1, 2005; 39(6): 531 - 535.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
D. Scheinert, S. Scheinert, J. Sax, C. Piorkowski, S. Braunlich, M. Ulrich, G. Biamino, and A. Schmidt
Prevalence and clinical impact of stent fractures after femoropopliteal stenting
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 18, 2005; 45(2): 312 - 315.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. Sabeti, M. Schillinger, J. Amighi, C. Sherif, W. Mlekusch, R. Ahmadi, and E. Minar
Primary Patency of Femoropopliteal Arteries Treated with Nitinol versus Stainless Steel Self-expanding Stents: Propensity Score-adjusted Analysis
Radiology, August 1, 2004; 232(2): 516 - 521.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2002 by the Radiological Society of North America.