HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 2222000551v1 222/2/474    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hopper, K. D. Articles by Mauger, D. T. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hopper, K. D. Articles by Mauger, D. T.

Comparison of Electron-Beam and Ungated Helical CT in Detecting Coronary Arterial Calcification by Using a Working Heart Phantom and Artificial Coronary Arteries¹

¹ From the Departments of Radiology (K.D.H.) and Health Evaluation Sciences (D.T.M.), Penn State College of Medicine, 500 University Dr, PO Box 850, Hershey, PA 17033; and the Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Health System, Pa (D.C.S.). Received February 22, 2000; revision requested April 8; final revision received August 6, 2001; accepted August 21. Supported in part by an unrestricted grant from Marconi Medical Systems. Address correspondence to K.D.H. (e-mail: khopper@psu.edu).

PURPOSE: To determine the sensitivity and specificity of cardiac gated electron-beam computed tomography (CT) and ungated helical CT in detecting and quantifying coronary arterial calcification (CAC) by using a working heart phantom and artificial coronary arteries.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A working heart phantom simulating normal cardiac motion and providing attenuation equal to that of an adult thorax was used. Thirty tubes with a 3-mm inner diameter were internally coated with pulverized human cortical bone mixed with epoxy glue to simulate minimal (n = 10), mild (n = 10), or severe (n = 10) calcified plaques. Ten additional tubes were not coated and served as normal controls. The tubes were attached to the same location on the phantom heart and scanned with electron-beam CT and helical CT in horizontal and vertical planes. Actual plaque calcium content was subsequently quantified with atopic spectroscopy. Two blinded experienced radiologic imaging teams, one for each CT system, separately measured calcium content in the model vessels by using a Hounsfield unit threshold of 130 or greater.

RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of electron-beam CT in detecting CAC were 66.1% and 80.0%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of helical CT were 96.4% and 95.0%, respectively. Electron-beam CT was less reliable when vessels were oriented vertically (sensitivity and specificity, 71.4% and 70%; 95% CI: 39.0%, 75.0%) versus horizontally (sensitivity and specificity, 60.7% and 90.0%; 95% CI: 48.0%, 82.0%). When a correction factor was applied, the volume of calcified plaque was statistically better quantified with helical CT than with electron-beam CT (P = .004).

CONCLUSION: Ungated helical CT depicts coronary arterial calcium better than does gated electron-beam CT. When appropriate correction factors are applied, helical CT is superior to electron-beam CT in quantifying coronary arterial calcium. Although further work must be done to optimize helical CT grading systems and scanning protocols, the data of this study demonstrated helical CT’s inherent advantage over currently commercially available electron-beam CT systems in CAC detection and quantification.

Index terms: Computed tomography (CT), comparative studies, 51.12115, 51.12119 • Computed tomography (CT), electron beam, 51.12119 • Computed tomography (CT), helical, 51.12115 • Coronary vessels, calcification, 54.81 • Heart, calcification, 544.12115, 544.12119 • Heart, CT, 542.12115, 544.12115, 544.12119 • Phantoms

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. M. McEniery, B. J. McDonnell, A. So, S. Aitken, C. E. Bolton, M. Munnery, S. S. Hickson, Yasmin, K. M. Maki-Petaja, J. R. Cockcroft, et al. Aortic Calcification Is Associated With Aortic Stiffness and Isolated Systolic Hypertension in Healthy Individuals Hypertension, March 1, 2009; 53(3): 524 - 531. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M.-T. Wu, P. Yang, Y.-L. Huang, J.-S. Chen, C.-C. Chuo, C. Yeh, and R.-S. Chang Coronary Arterial Calcification on Low-Dose Ungated MDCT for Lung Cancer Screening: Concordance Study with Dedicated Cardiac CT Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2008; 190(4): 923 - 928. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Raman, B. Raman, S. Napel, and G. D. Rubin Semiautomated Quantification of the Mass and Distribution of Vascular Calcification with Multidetector CT: Method and Evaluation Radiology, April 1, 2008; 247(1): 241 - 250. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. L. Daniell, N. D. Wong, J. D. Friedman, N. Ben-Yosef, R. Miranda-Peats, S. W. Hayes, X. Kang, M. G. Sciammarella, L. de Yang, G. Germano, et al. Concordance of Coronary Artery Calcium Estimates Between MDCT and Electron Beam Tomography Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2005; 185(6): 1542 - 1545. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				U. J. Schoepf, C. R. Becker, B. M. Ohnesorge, and E. K. Yucel CT of Coronary Artery Disease Radiology, July 1, 2004; 232(1): 18 - 37. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				U. Hoffmann, D. C. Kwait, J. Handwerker, R. Chan, G. Lamuraglia, and T. J. Brady Vascular Calcification in ex Vivo Carotid Specimens: Precision and Accuracy of Measurements with Multi-Detector Row CT Radiology, November 1, 2003; 229(2): 375 - 381. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]