Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print January 7, 2002, 10.1148/radiol.2222010608
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2222010608v1
222/2/564    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yoo, S. K.
Right arrow Articles by Prince, M. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yoo, S. K.
Right arrow Articles by Prince, M. R.
(Radiology 2002;222:564-568.)
© RSNA, 2002


Technical Developments

Postprocessing Techniques for Time-resolved Contrast-enhanced MR Angiography1

Stanley K. Yoo, BS, Richard Watts, PhD, Priscilla A. Winchester, MD, Ramin Zabih, PhD, Yi Wang, PhD and Martin R. Prince, MD, PhD

1 From the Department of Radiology MR Research, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, 515 E 71st St, Suite S120, New York, NY 10021. Received March 14, 2001; revision requested April 27; revision received June 27; accepted July 24. Supported in part by the American Heart Association-Heritage (grant 9951018T) and the National Institutes of Health (grants R01 HL60879, R01 HL62994). Address correspondence to Y.W. (e-mail: yiwang@med.cornell.edu).

The purpose of this study was to improve dynamic two-dimensional projection magnetic resonance digital subtraction angiography by using remasking and filtering postprocessing techniques. Four methods were evaluated in 50 patients: default mask subtraction, remasked subtraction, filtering based on the SD, and linear filtering. The results demonstrated that postprocessing techniques such as linear filtering can reduce background motion artifacts and improve arterial contrast-to-noise ratio.

Index terms: Magnetic resonance (MR), image processing, 9*.129422, **.129423 • Magnetic resonance (MR), vascular studies, 9*.12942, **.12942




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. G. W. Fraser, A. R. Moody, I. R. Davidson, A. L. Martel, and P. S. Morgan
Deep Venous Thrombosis: Diagnosis by Using Venous Enhanced Subtracted Peak Arterial MR Venography versus Conventional Venography
Radiology, March 1, 2003; 226(3): 812 - 820.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2002 by the Radiological Society of North America.