| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Radiation Oncology |
1 From the Department of Radiation Oncology, New York University School of Medicine, 566 First Ave, New York, NY 10016 (S.C.F., B.S.R.), and the Departments of Surgery (K.A.S.) and Radiation Oncology (G.J.), Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, Calif. Received April 12, 2001; revision requested May 11; revision received June 29; accepted July 5. Supported by Breast Research Grant Pilot Projects, IB-95-3 from NCI Norris Cancer Center Breast Cancer Research Program grant R21CA66222, 1995; Stop Cancer Award, 1996; and California Breast Cancer Research Program BCRP 2CB-0224, 1997. Address correspondence to S.C.F.
PURPOSE: To explore the feasibility of a short course of hypofractionated conformal radiation therapy to the tumor bed as part of a breast preservation protocol in postmenopausal patients with nonpalpable pT1N0 stage breast cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The tumor bed was imaged at computed tomography (CT) in the prone position on a dedicated table. The same table and position were used for treatment with a 4-MV linear accelerator. The planning target volume was the tumor bed plus a 1–2-cm margin defined at postmastectomy CT. A regimen of five fractions was tested in this pilot dose study. Cosmesis was assessed by patients and physicians before treatment and 36 months after treatment.
RESULTS: Ten consecutive patients who were eligible for the study were assigned to one of three dose-per-fraction regimens; nine were treatable with the proposed technique on the basis of CT findings. Patients received five fractions over 10 days (total dose range, 25–30 Gy): Three received 5.0 Gy per fraction; four, 5.5 Gy; and two, 6.0 Gy. At minimum follow-up of 36 months (range, 36–53 months), all patients were alive and disease free with good to excellent cosmesis.
CONCLUSION: Hypofractionated conformal breast radiation therapy is feasible. Further studies are warranted.
Index terms: Breast, CT, 00.1211 • Breast neoplasms, 00.32 • Breast neoplasms, therapeutic radiology, 00.1269 • Computed tomography (CT), treatment planning, 00.1211
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S. Pruthi, J. C. Boughey, K. R. Brandt, A. C. Degnim, G. K. Dy, M. P. Goetz, E. A. Perez, C. A. Reynolds, P. J. Schomberg, and J. N. Ingle A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Management of Breast Cancer, Part 2: Therapeutic Considerations Mayo Clin. Proc., September 1, 2007; 82(9): 1131 - 1140. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S Chopra, K A Dinshaw, R Kamble, and R Sarin Breast movement during normal and deep breathing, respiratory training and set up errors: implications for external beam partial breast irradiation. Br. J. Radiol., September 1, 2006; 79(945): 766 - 773. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. W. Arthur and F. A. Vicini Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation As a Part of Breast Conservation Therapy J. Clin. Oncol., March 10, 2005; 23(8): 1726 - 1735. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. Wallner, D. Arthur, H. Bartelink, J. Connolly, G. Edmundson, A. Giuliano, N. Goldstein, J. Hevezi, T. Julian, R. Kuske, et al. Workshop on Partial Breast Irradiation: State of the Art and the Science, Bethesda, MD, December 8-10, 2002 J Natl Cancer Inst, February 4, 2004; 96(3): 175 - 184. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
