Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print January 25, 2002, 10.1148/radiol.2223010573

(Radiology 2002;222:805.)

A more recent version of this article appeared on March 1, 2002
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2223010573v1
222/3/805    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boehm, T.
Right arrow Articles by Kaiser, W. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Boehm, T.
Right arrow Articles by Kaiser, W. A.


Experimental Studies

Radio-frequency Tumor Ablation: Internally Cooled Electrode versus Saline-enhanced Technique in an Aggressive Rabbit Tumor Model1

Thomas Boehm, MD, Ansgar Malich, MD, S. Nahum Goldberg, MD, Jürgen R. Reichenbach, PhD, Ingrid Hilger, PhD, Peter Hauff, DVM, PhD, Michael Reinhardt, Marlies Fleck, MD and Werner A. Kaiser, MD

1 From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Universitätsspital Zürich, Rämistrasse 100, CH-8091 Zürich, Switzerland (T.B.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Germany (A.M., J.R.R., I.H., M.F., W.A.K.); Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (S.N.G.); and Schering AG, Research Laboratories, Berlin, Germany (P.H., M.R.). Received March 7, 2001; revision requested April 9; revision received June 18; accepted July 24. Address correspondence to T.B. (e-mail: thomas_boehm@gmx.net).

PURPOSE: To compare two methods of radio-frequency (RF) ablation, saline enhancement technique and internally cooled electrodes, for the treatment of small breast cancers in an animal model—highly aggressive VX2 rabbit tumors surrounded by adipose tissue.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven tumors were implanted into retroperitoneal fat of 14 New Zealand White rabbits. RF ablation was performed with ultrasonographic (US) guidance after tumors had grown to 15 mm. Fourteen tumors in seven animals were treated with internally cooled electrodes (30-mm-tip single electrode, 60 W, 10 min); 13 tumors in seven animals, with saline enhancement (0.5 mL/min of saline, 25-mm tip, 30 W, 10 min). Autopsy and histopathologic assessment were performed 3 weeks after therapy.

RESULTS: Real-time US of RF ablation was not possible with either method because of obscuration by the increasing hyperechogenicity of the tumor and the surrounding adipose tissue. Equivalent efficacy was demonstrated with the two methods. Significantly greater complications were observed with the saline technique: Free retroperitoneal fluid was detected in one of seven animals with internally cooled electrodes and in all seven animals with saline enhancement (P < .01). Damage to remote structures such as the kidney, spine muscle, and skin was observed at autopsy in one of seven animals with internally cooled technique versus five of seven with saline enhancement (P < .01).

CONCLUSION: Given a lower complication rate and similar treatment efficacy in an animal tumor model, internally cooled RF electrode may be advantageous to adjuvant saline infusion for the minimally invasive treatment of breast tumors.

© RSNA, 2002

Index terms: Animals • Breast neoplasms, 00.30 • Radiofrequency (RF) ablation, 00.1269 • Ultrasound (US), guidance, 00.12986




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
P. F. Laeseke, L. A. Sampson, T. C. Winter III, and F. T. Lee Jr.
Use of Dextrose 5% in Water Instead of Saline to Protect Against Inadvertent Radiofrequency Injuries
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2005; 184(3): 1026 - 1027.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. M. Lee, J. K. Han, S. H. Kim, S. H. Choi, S. K. An, C. J. Han, and B. I. Choi
Bipolar Radiofrequency Ablation Using Wet-Cooled Electrodes: An In Vitro Experimental Study in Bovine Liver
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2005; 184(2): 391 - 397.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
P. L. Pereira, J. Trubenbach, M. Schenk, J. Subke, S. Kroeber, I. Schaefer, C. T. Remy, D. Schmidt, J. Brieger, and C. D. Claussen
Radiofrequency Ablation: In Vivo Comparison of Four Commercially Available Devices in Pig Livers
Radiology, August 1, 2004; 232(2): 482 - 490.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. A. Shock, K. Meredith, T. F. Warner, L. A. Sampson, A. S. Wright, T. C. Winter III, D. M. Mahvi, J. P. Fine, and F. T. Lee Jr
Microwave Ablation with Loop Antenna: In Vivo Porcine Liver Model
Radiology, April 1, 2004; 231(1): 143 - 149.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. Giorgio, L. Tarantino, G. de Stefano, V. Scala, G. Liorre, F. Scarano, A. Perrotta, N. Farella, V. Aloisio, N. Mariniello, et al.
Percutaneous Sonographically Guided Saline-Enhanced Radiofrequency Ablation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2003; 181(2): 479 - 484.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. Kettenbach, W. Kostler, E. Rucklinger, B. Gustorff, M. Hupfl, F. Wolf, K. Peer, M. Weigner, J. Lammer, W. Muller, et al.
Percutaneous Saline-Enhanced Radiofrequency Ablation of Unresectable Hepatic Tumors: Initial Experience in 26 Patients
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2003; 180(6): 1537 - 1545.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
T. Boehm, A. Malich, S. N. Goldberg, P. Hauff, M. Reinhardt, J. R. Reichenbach, W. Muller, M. Fleck, B. Seifert, and W. A. Kaiser
Radio-frequency Ablation of VX2 Rabbit Tumors: Assessment of Completeness of Treatment by Using Contrast-enhanced Harmonic Power Doppler US
Radiology, December 1, 2002; 225(3): 815 - 821.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2002 by the Radiological Society of North America.