| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Obstetric Imaging |
1 From the Departments of Radiology (R.S.B., P.W.C., V.A.F., R.A.F.) and Epidemiology and Biostatistics (R.S.B., P.B.), University of California, San Francisco, UCSF/Mt Zion Medical Center, 1600 Divisadero St, Box 1667, San Francisco, CA 94115; and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (J.L.E.). Received May 2, 2001; revision requested June 4; revision received July 26; accepted August 24. R.S.B. supported in part by a Radiological Society of North America Nycomed-Amersham Research and Education Foundation grant. Address correspondence to R.S.B. (e-mail: rebecca.smith-bindman@radiology.ucsf.edu).
PURPOSE: To determine whether fetal growth measured at serial ultrasonographic (US) examinations can predict neonatal morbidity, independent of whether gestational age is known.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Women (n = 321) who had singleton pregnancies and underwent two or more second- or third-trimester obstetric US examinations were included in a retrospective cohort analysis. Inadequate fetal growth was defined as growth at or below the 10th percentile. The relative risk of each poor outcome was calculated for fetuses with inadequate growth, compared with the risk for fetuses with normal growth.
RESULTS: Inadequate fetal growth was associated with 3.9 times the risk of a birth weight less than 2,500 g, 17.7 times the risk of a birth weight less than the 3rd percentile for gestational age, 2.3 times the risk of preterm birth, 2.6 times the risk of a long newborn hospital stay, and 3.6 times the risk of neonatal intensive care unit admission. After adjusting for confounding variables, including fetal weight, fetal growth remained a significant predictor of small birth size and poor outcomes. Inadequate growth predicted the risk of poor outcomes, even when gestational age was unknown. When inadequate growth was used to identify fetuses at risk, 21%–67% of neonates who were small at birth or had poor outcomes were identified at false-positive rates of only 5%–9%. For all outcomes, inadequate growth enabled identification of more fetuses with poor birth outcomes than low estimated fetal weight.
CONCLUSION: Morbidity is significantly increased among fetuses who demonstrate less than expected growth. Growth between two US examinations can be used to estimate the risk of neonatal morbidity, even when gestational age is unknown.
© RSNA, 2002
Index terms: Fetus, growth and development, 856.871 • Fetus, US, 856.1298 • Infants, newborn • Pregnancy, US, 856.1298
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  V. L. Ward, M. Nishino, H. Hatabu, J. A. Estroff, C. E. Barnewolt, H. A. Feldman, and D. Levine Fetal Lung Volume Measurements: Determination with MR Imaging--Effect of Various Factors. Radiology, July 1, 2006; 240(1): 187 - 193. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B F Kalanda, S van Buuren, F H Verhoeff, and B J Brabin Anthropometry of fetal growth in rural Malawi in relation to maternal malaria and HIV status Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., March 1, 2005; 90(2): F161 - F165. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. Smith-Bindman, P. W. Chu, J. Ecker, V. A. Feldstein, R. A. Filly, and P. Bacchetti Adverse Birth Outcomes in Relation to Prenatal Sonographic Measurements of Fetal Size J. Ultrasound Med., April 1, 2003; 22(4): 347 - 356. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |
