Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2231010841
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Siegel, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by McNeil, B. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Siegel, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by McNeil, B. J.
(Radiology 2002;223:168-175.)
© RSNA, 2002


Pediatric Imaging

Staging of Neuroblastoma at Imaging: Report of the Radiology Diagnostic Oncology Group1

Marilyn J. Siegel, MD, Hemant Ishwaran, PhD, Barry D. Fletcher, MD, James S. Meyer, MD, Fredric A. Hoffer, MD, Diego Jaramillo, MD, Ramiro J. Hernandez, MD, Susan E. Roubal, DO, Barry A. Siegel, MD, Daryl J. Caudry, MS and Barbara J. McNeil, MD, PhD

1 From the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, 510 S Kingshighway Blvd, St Louis, MO 63110 (M.J.S., B.A.S.); Department of Biostatistics, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (H.I.); Department of Diagnostic Imaging, St Jude’s Children’s Hospital, Memphis, Tenn (B.D.F., F.A.H.); Department of Radiology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Pa (J.S.M.); Departments of Radiology (D.J.) and Health Care Policy (D.J.C., B.J.M.), Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass; Department of Radiology, C. S. Mott Children’s Hospital, Ann Arbor, Mich (R.J.H.); Department of Pediatric Imaging, Children’s Hospital, Detroit, Mich (S.E.R.); and Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Mass (B.J.M.). Received April 25, 2001; revision requested June 15; revision received August 3; accepted September 17. Supported by grant CA59403 from the National Cancer Institute. Address correspondence to M.J.S. (e-mail: siegelm@mir.wustl.edu).

PURPOSE: To compare the accuracies of computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, and bone scintigraphy in staging disease in patients with neuroblastoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety-six children with newly diagnosed neuroblastoma were enrolled in a multicenter prospective cohort study. CT, MR, and bone scintigraphy were used to evaluate tumor stage. Sensitivity and specificity values and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were used to compare the accuracy of CT, MR, and scintigraphy for tumor staging.

RESULTS: Eighty-eight patients were eligible for staging analysis, and 45 patients who underwent surgery at initial diagnosis were eligible for analysis of local tumor extent. CT and MR had sensitivities of 43% and 83%, respectively (P < .01), and specificities of 97% and 88%, respectively (P > .05), for detection of stage 4 disease. Areas under the ROC curves for CT and MR were 0.81 and 0.85, respectively (P = .06); that for scintigraphy was 0.83. Addition of scintigraphy to both CT and MR increased the areas under the ROC curves to 0.90 and 0.88, respectively. Accuracy of CT and MR for staging disease confined to the chest or abdomen (stages 1, 2, and 3) was poor.

CONCLUSION: MR alone and CT and MR combined with bone scintigraphy enable the accurate detection of stage 4 disease. Both CT and MR perform poorly for local tumor staging.

© RSNA, 2002

Index terms: Computed tomography (CT), comparative studies, 60.1211, 80.1211 • Magnetic resonance (MR), comparative studies, 60.1214, 80.1214 • Neoplasms, staging • Neuroblastoma, 60.3251 • Radionuclides, comparative studies, 60.1216, 80.1216




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
G. W. L. Boland, M. A. Blake, P. F. Hahn, and W. W. Mayo-Smith
Incidental Adrenal Lesions: Principles, Techniques, and Algorithms for Imaging Characterization
Radiology, December 1, 2008; 249(3): 756 - 775.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
K. Rozovsky, B. Z. Koplewitz, Y. Krausz, S. Revel-Vilk, M. Weintraub, R. Chisin, and M. Klein
Added Value of SPECT/CT for Correlation of MIBG Scintigraphy and Diagnostic CT in Neuroblastoma and Pheochromocytoma
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2008; 190(4): 1085 - 1090.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
F. E. Moron, M. C. Morriss, J. J. Jones, and J. V. Hunter
Lumps and Bumps on the Head in Children: Use of CT and MR Imaging in Solving the Clinical Diagnostic Dilemma
RadioGraphics, November 1, 2004; 24(6): 1655 - 1674.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
M. Lindskog, C. Spenger, J. Jarvet, A. Graslund, and P. Kogner
Predicting Resistance or Response to Chemotherapy by Proton Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy in Neuroblastoma
J Natl Cancer Inst, October 6, 2004; 96(19): 1457 - 1466.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
B. H. Kushner
Neuroblastoma: A Disease Requiring a Multitude of Imaging Studies
J. Nucl. Med., July 1, 2004; 45(7): 1172 - 1188.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
K. Hahn, M. Charron, B. L. Shulkin, M. J. Siegel, and F. A. Hoffer
Role of MR Imaging and Iodine 123 MIBG Scintigraphy in Staging of Pediatric Neuroblastoma [letter] * Drs Siegel and Hoffer respond:
Radiology, June 1, 2003; 227(3): 908 - 909.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. C. Leonidas and M. J. Siegel
MR Imaging in the Assessment of Staging of Neuroblastoma * Dr Siegel responds:
Radiology, January 1, 2003; 226(1): 285 - 286.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
N.-K. V. Cheung, B. H. Kushner, and M. J. Siegel
Should We Replace Bone Scintigraphy Plus CT with MR Imaging for Staging of Neuroblastoma? * Dr Siegel responds:
Radiology, January 1, 2003; 226(1): 286 - 288.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. Mazumdar, M. J. Siegel, V. Narra, and L. Luchtman-Jones
Whole-Body Fast Inversion Recovery MR Imaging of Small Cell Neoplasms in Pediatric Patients: A Pilot Study
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2002; 179(5): 1261 - 1266.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ImagingHome page
A M Connors and S P Blake
Multiple-choice questionnaire: general
Imaging, October 1, 2002; 14(5): 428 - 437.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2002 by the Radiological Society of North America.