|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Technical Developments |
1 From the Division of Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology (D.Y.S.), and Division of Pain Management, Department of Anesthesiology (S.C.M.), Stanford University Medical Center, 300 Pasteur Dr, Stanford, CA 94305. Received April 11, 2001; revision requested May 18; revision received August 24; accepted September 28. Address correspondence to D.Y.S. (e-mail: dansze@stanford.edu).
The authors performed sympathetic nerve blockades in seven patients with peripheral ischemia and possible autonomic dysfunction. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging was used to guide needle placement, to monitor distribution of injected agents, and to measure increases in blood flow, which were as much as 10-fold. MR imaging can provide both procedural imaging guidance and measurement of efficacy for sympathetic nerve blocks.
© RSNA, 2002
Index terms: Anesthesia, 30.1264, 90.1266 Blood, flow dynamics, 30.12141, 90.12941 Magnetic resonance (MR), cine study, 30.12141, 30.12144, 90.12941, 99.12944 Magnetic resonance (MR), guidance, 30.1264, 90.1266 Nerves, interventional procedures, 30.1264, 90.1266 Nerves, peripheral, 30.1264, 90.1266
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. R. Schmid, R. O. Kissling, A. Curt, G. Jaschko, and J. Hodler Sympathetic Skin Response: Monitoring of CT-guided Lumbar Sympathetic Blocks Radiology, November 1, 2006; 241(2): 595 - 602. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||