Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print April 10, 2002, 10.1148/radiol.2233011076
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2233011076v1
223/3/633    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kaiser, S.
Right arrow Articles by Jorulf, H. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kaiser, S.
Right arrow Articles by Jorulf, H. K.
(Radiology 2002;223:633-638.)
© RSNA, 2002


Pediatric Imaging

Suspected Appendicitis in Children: US and CT— A Prospective Randomized Study1

Sylvie Kaiser, MD, Björn Frenckner, MD, PhD and Hakan K. Jorulf, MD, PhD

1 From the Departments of Pediatric Radiology (S.K., H.K.J.) and Pediatric Surgery (B.F.), Astrid Lindgren Children’s Hospital, Karolinska Institute, SE-171 76 Stockholm, Sweden. Received June 20, 2001; revision requested July 9; revision received September 24; accepted November 12. Supported by grants from the Crown Princess Lovisa’s Association for Children’s Health Care and the Axel Tielman Foundation. Address correspondence to S.K. (e-mail: sylvie.kaiser@ks.se).

PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy of ultrasonography (US) and of abdominal computed tomography (CT) performed in addition to US in the diagnosis of childhood appendicitis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six hundred children with suspected appendicitis were included in a prospective randomized study. After clinical examination, the patients were randomly assigned to undergo US only (283 patients) or US with abdominal CT (317 patients). Radiologic findings were correlated with surgical, histopathologic, and clinical follow-up findings.

RESULTS: Two hundred forty-four (40.7%) of all patients had appendicitis. In the US only group, US had a sensitivity of 86%, specificity of 95%, positive predictive value of 91%, negative predictive value of 92%, and diagnostic accuracy of 92%. The combination of US and CT performed in the other group yielded a sensitivity of 99%, specificity of 89%, positive predictive value of 87%, negative predictive value of 99%, and diagnostic accuracy of 93%. Analysis of data on US performed in all 600 patients and on CT performed in 317 patients revealed, respectively, sensitivities of 80% and 97%, specificities of 94% and 93%, positive predictive values of 91% and 92%, negative predictive values of 88% and 98%, and diagnostic accuracies of 89% and 95%. The overall negative appendectomy rate was 3.7%; and the perforation rate, 21%.

CONCLUSION: US is valuable in the diagnosis of appendicitis in children. In inconclusive cases, performing additional abdominal CT can improve diagnostic accuracy and thereby decrease the negative appendectomy rate without an increase in the perforation rate.

© RSNA, 2002

Index terms: Appendicitis, 751.291 • Appendix, CT, 751.12111, 751.12112, 751.12115 • Appendix, US, 751.12989 • Children, gastrointestinal tract, 751.291




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. Baldisserotto, S. G. Valduga, and C. F. J. S. da Cunha
MR Imaging Evaluation of the Normal Appendix in Children and Adolescents
Radiology, October 1, 2008; 249(1): 278 - 284.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. Tsuboi, K. Takase, I. Kaneda, T. Ishibashi, T. Yamada, M. Kitami, S. Higano, and S. Takahashi
Perforated and Nonperforated Appendicitis: Defect in Enhancing Appendiceal Wall Depiction with Multi Detector Row CT
Radiology, January 1, 2008; 246(1): 142 - 147.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
K. Yabunaka, T. Katsuda, S. Sanada, and T. Fukutomi
Sonographic Appearance of the Normal Appendix in Adults
J. Ultrasound Med., January 1, 2007; 26(1): 37 - 43.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. S. Doria, R. Moineddin, C. J. Kellenberger, M. Epelman, J. Beyene, S. Schuh, P. S. Babyn, and P. T. Dick
US or CT for Diagnosis of Appendicitis in Children and Adults? A Meta-Analysis
Radiology, October 1, 2006; 241(1): 83 - 94.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
N. Pinto Leite, J. M. Pereira, R. Cunha, P. Pinto, and C. Sirlin
CT Evaluation of Appendicitis and Its Complications: Imaging Techniques and Key Diagnostic Findings
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2005; 185(2): 406 - 417.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. Keyzer, M. Zalcman, V. De Maertelaer, E. Coppens, M.-A. Bali, P. A. Gevenois, and D. Van Gansbeke
Comparison of US and Unenhanced Multi-Detector Row CT in Patients Suspected of having Acute Appendicitis
Radiology, August 1, 2005; 236(2): 527 - 534.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
I. Dalal, E. Somekh, A. Bilker-Reich, M. Boaz, A. Gorenstein, and F. Serour
Serum and Peritoneal Inflammatory Mediators in Children With Suspected Acute Appendicitis
Arch Surg, February 1, 2005; 140(2): 169 - 173.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
H. O. Stolberg, G. Norman, and I. Trop
Randomized Controlled Trials
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2004; 183(6): 1539 - 1544.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
T. A. Ponsky, Z. J. Huang, K. Kittle, M. R. Eichelberger, J. C. Gilbert, F. Brody, and K. D. Newman
Hospital- and Patient-Level Characteristics and the Risk of Appendiceal Rupture and Negative Appendectomy in Children
JAMA, October 27, 2004; 292(16): 1977 - 1982.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
G. A. Taylor
Suspected Appendicitis in Children: In Search of the Single Best Diagnostic Test
Radiology, May 1, 2004; 231(2): 293 - 295.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. Kaiser, T. Finnbogason, H. K. Jorulf, E. Soderman, and B. Frenckner
Suspected Appendicitis in Children: Diagnosis with Contrast-enhanced versus Nonenhanced Helical CT
Radiology, May 1, 2004; 231(2): 427 - 433.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
P. Poortman, P. N. M. Lohle, C. M. C. Schoemaker, H. J. M. Oostvogel, H. J. L. J. M. Teepen, K. A. H. Zwinderman, and J. F. Hamming
Comparison of CT and Sonography in the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis: A Blinded Prospective Study
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2003; 181(5): 1355 - 1359.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
D. P. Frush, L. F. Donnelly, and N. S. Rosen
Computed Tomography and Radiation Risks: What Pediatric Health Care Providers Should Know
Pediatrics, October 1, 2003; 112(4): 951 - 957.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
L. Tarantino, A. Giorgio, G. de Stefano, V. Scala, F. Esposito, G. Liorre, N. Farella, and G. Ferraioli
Acute Appendicitis Mimicking Infectious Enteritis: Diagnostic Value of Sonography
J. Ultrasound Med., September 1, 2003; 22(9): 945 - 950.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2002 by the Radiological Society of North America.