|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pediatric Imaging |
1 From the Departments of Pediatric Radiology (S.K., H.K.J.) and Pediatric Surgery (B.F.), Astrid Lindgren Childrens Hospital, Karolinska Institute, SE-171 76 Stockholm, Sweden. Received June 20, 2001; revision requested July 9; revision received September 24; accepted November 12. Supported by grants from the Crown Princess Lovisas Association for Childrens Health Care and the Axel Tielman Foundation. Address correspondence to S.K. (e-mail: sylvie.kaiser@ks.se).
PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy of ultrasonography (US) and of abdominal computed tomography (CT) performed in addition to US in the diagnosis of childhood appendicitis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six hundred children with suspected appendicitis were included in a prospective randomized study. After clinical examination, the patients were randomly assigned to undergo US only (283 patients) or US with abdominal CT (317 patients). Radiologic findings were correlated with surgical, histopathologic, and clinical follow-up findings.
RESULTS: Two hundred forty-four (40.7%) of all patients had appendicitis. In the US only group, US had a sensitivity of 86%, specificity of 95%, positive predictive value of 91%, negative predictive value of 92%, and diagnostic accuracy of 92%. The combination of US and CT performed in the other group yielded a sensitivity of 99%, specificity of 89%, positive predictive value of 87%, negative predictive value of 99%, and diagnostic accuracy of 93%. Analysis of data on US performed in all 600 patients and on CT performed in 317 patients revealed, respectively, sensitivities of 80% and 97%, specificities of 94% and 93%, positive predictive values of 91% and 92%, negative predictive values of 88% and 98%, and diagnostic accuracies of 89% and 95%. The overall negative appendectomy rate was 3.7%; and the perforation rate, 21%.
CONCLUSION: US is valuable in the diagnosis of appendicitis in children. In inconclusive cases, performing additional abdominal CT can improve diagnostic accuracy and thereby decrease the negative appendectomy rate without an increase in the perforation rate.
© RSNA, 2002
Index terms: Appendicitis, 751.291 Appendix, CT, 751.12111, 751.12112, 751.12115 Appendix, US, 751.12989 Children, gastrointestinal tract, 751.291
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Baldisserotto, S. G. Valduga, and C. F. J. S. da Cunha MR Imaging Evaluation of the Normal Appendix in Children and Adolescents Radiology, October 1, 2008; 249(1): 278 - 284. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Tsuboi, K. Takase, I. Kaneda, T. Ishibashi, T. Yamada, M. Kitami, S. Higano, and S. Takahashi Perforated and Nonperforated Appendicitis: Defect in Enhancing Appendiceal Wall Depiction with Multi Detector Row CT Radiology, January 1, 2008; 246(1): 142 - 147. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Yabunaka, T. Katsuda, S. Sanada, and T. Fukutomi Sonographic Appearance of the Normal Appendix in Adults J. Ultrasound Med., January 1, 2007; 26(1): 37 - 43. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. S. Doria, R. Moineddin, C. J. Kellenberger, M. Epelman, J. Beyene, S. Schuh, P. S. Babyn, and P. T. Dick US or CT for Diagnosis of Appendicitis in Children and Adults? A Meta-Analysis Radiology, October 1, 2006; 241(1): 83 - 94. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Pinto Leite, J. M. Pereira, R. Cunha, P. Pinto, and C. Sirlin CT Evaluation of Appendicitis and Its Complications: Imaging Techniques and Key Diagnostic Findings Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2005; 185(2): 406 - 417. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Keyzer, M. Zalcman, V. De Maertelaer, E. Coppens, M.-A. Bali, P. A. Gevenois, and D. Van Gansbeke Comparison of US and Unenhanced Multi-Detector Row CT in Patients Suspected of having Acute Appendicitis Radiology, August 1, 2005; 236(2): 527 - 534. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Dalal, E. Somekh, A. Bilker-Reich, M. Boaz, A. Gorenstein, and F. Serour Serum and Peritoneal Inflammatory Mediators in Children With Suspected Acute Appendicitis Arch Surg, February 1, 2005; 140(2): 169 - 173. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. O. Stolberg, G. Norman, and I. Trop Randomized Controlled Trials Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2004; 183(6): 1539 - 1544. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. A. Ponsky, Z. J. Huang, K. Kittle, M. R. Eichelberger, J. C. Gilbert, F. Brody, and K. D. Newman Hospital- and Patient-Level Characteristics and the Risk of Appendiceal Rupture and Negative Appendectomy in Children JAMA, October 27, 2004; 292(16): 1977 - 1982. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. A. Taylor Suspected Appendicitis in Children: In Search of the Single Best Diagnostic Test Radiology, May 1, 2004; 231(2): 293 - 295. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Kaiser, T. Finnbogason, H. K. Jorulf, E. Soderman, and B. Frenckner Suspected Appendicitis in Children: Diagnosis with Contrast-enhanced versus Nonenhanced Helical CT Radiology, May 1, 2004; 231(2): 427 - 433. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Poortman, P. N. M. Lohle, C. M. C. Schoemaker, H. J. M. Oostvogel, H. J. L. J. M. Teepen, K. A. H. Zwinderman, and J. F. Hamming Comparison of CT and Sonography in the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis: A Blinded Prospective Study Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2003; 181(5): 1355 - 1359. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. P. Frush, L. F. Donnelly, and N. S. Rosen Computed Tomography and Radiation Risks: What Pediatric Health Care Providers Should Know Pediatrics, October 1, 2003; 112(4): 951 - 957. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Tarantino, A. Giorgio, G. de Stefano, V. Scala, F. Esposito, G. Liorre, N. Farella, and G. Ferraioli Acute Appendicitis Mimicking Infectious Enteritis: Diagnostic Value of Sonography J. Ultrasound Med., September 1, 2003; 22(9): 945 - 950. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |